Despite the continued existence <strong>and</strong> indeed expansion of a wide range of <strong>food</strong>production activities in cities, as Pires (2011) notes, the very notion of <strong>urban</strong> agricultureis seen by some as a contradiction in terms – agriculture being something that happensbeyond cities in rural areas. Bartling (2012) traces the ways in which post-war <strong>urban</strong>culture, especially in the USA, celebrated the proliferation of consumption overproduction <strong>and</strong> presented a set of practices <strong>and</strong> behaviours that were ‘appropriate’ for<strong>urban</strong> <strong>and</strong> sub<strong>urban</strong> life. Increasingly this defined <strong>urban</strong> animal husb<strong>and</strong>ry <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong>production as ‘inappropriate’ <strong>and</strong> although there is now clear evidence of a large <strong>and</strong>growing counter-cultural response to this, the relationships between ‘natural’ <strong>and</strong> builtenvironments <strong>and</strong> between humans <strong>and</strong> nature continue to influence contemporary<strong>urban</strong> policy debates, albeit often in subtle ways (Turner, Nakamura & Dinetti, 2004;Register, 2006).Most definitions of <strong>urban</strong> agriculture include a variety of activities carried out at manydifferent scales, from the domestic to the citywide. Although definitions vary to someextent by region <strong>and</strong> country, they are increasingly embracing this wider range ofactivities.Hodgson et al. (2011) offer one such comprehensive definition:<strong>Urban</strong> agriculture encompasses far more than private <strong>and</strong> community gardens. Itis typically defined as the production of fruits <strong>and</strong> vegetables, raising of animals,<strong>and</strong> cultivation of fish for local sale <strong>and</strong> consumption. A more holistic systemsdefinition acknowledges the connection between <strong>urban</strong> agriculture <strong>and</strong> the larger<strong>food</strong> system, as well its influence <strong>and</strong> dependence on a variety of economic,environmental, <strong>and</strong> social resources.They note also the other important but less common <strong>urban</strong> agricultural activities,including:institutional <strong>and</strong> demonstration gardensedible l<strong>and</strong>scapinghobby <strong>and</strong> commercial bee, poultry <strong>and</strong> animal keeping<strong>urban</strong> <strong>and</strong> peri-<strong>urban</strong> farmshybrid forms that integrate gardening <strong>and</strong> farming.Mougeot (2000) has argued strongly for bringing <strong>urban</strong> agriculture to its ‘conceptualmaturity’ so that it is better able to help us underst<strong>and</strong> it as an activity <strong>and</strong> press forgreater intervention to support it. Whether we or not we welcome the phenomenon, theexpression ‘<strong>urban</strong> agriculture’, originally used only by scholars <strong>and</strong> the media, has nowbeen adopted by UN agencies such as the UNDP <strong>and</strong> is increasingly being consideredby <strong>urban</strong> <strong>and</strong> metropolitan governments in broader considerations of <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong>.Mougeot’s approach is to integrate various conceptual building blocks for a morecomprehensive definition of <strong>urban</strong> agriculture: the types of economic activity involved;the categories of <strong>food</strong> <strong>and</strong> non-<strong>food</strong> items produced; the locations where it is practised;the relations between <strong>urban</strong> <strong>and</strong> peri-<strong>urban</strong> systems; the nature of production systems;the scale of production; <strong>and</strong> product destinations.<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 21
Like Hodgson et al., as per definition above – this leads Mougeot to offer this morecomprehensive <strong>and</strong> consistent definition:<strong>Urban</strong> agriculture is an industry located within or on the fringe of a town, a city ora metropolis, which grows or raises, processes <strong>and</strong> distributes a diversity of <strong>food</strong><strong>and</strong> non-<strong>food</strong> products, (re-)using largely human <strong>and</strong> material resources,products <strong>and</strong> services found in <strong>and</strong> around that <strong>urban</strong> area, <strong>and</strong> in turn supplyinghuman <strong>and</strong> material resources, products <strong>and</strong> services largely to that <strong>urban</strong> area.As shown later in this report, not all <strong>urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> growers identify with the term <strong>urban</strong>agriculture, <strong>and</strong> many do not conceive of it as an ‘industry’. Indeed, many of theactivities as well as the informal networks of <strong>food</strong> distribution that exist under theumbrella term of ‘<strong>urban</strong> agriculture’ occur outside of the formal economy throughpractices such as gleaning, <strong>food</strong> swapping <strong>and</strong> sharing.In an annotated bibliography of <strong>urban</strong> agriculture prepared for the SwedishInternational Development Agency (Sida), De Zeeuw notes that:<strong>Urban</strong> agriculture is not easy to define since a large variety of <strong>urban</strong> farmingsystems can be encountered, with varying characteristics according to localsocio-economic, physio-geographic <strong>and</strong> political conditions. (p. 7)In contrast to agriculture, or more specifically, rural agriculture – <strong>urban</strong> agriculture isdescribed as agriculture:… that it is integrated into the <strong>urban</strong> economic <strong>and</strong> ecological system...It is notits <strong>urban</strong> location which distinguishes <strong>urban</strong> from rural agriculture, but the fact it isembedded in <strong>and</strong> interacts with the <strong>urban</strong> ecosystem. (p. 9)In the cities of developing countries, local <strong>food</strong> production is often a response toinadequate, unreliable <strong>and</strong> irregular access to <strong>food</strong> as well as to poverty or lack ofpurchasing power. In Australian cities the motivations are generally speaking different.They often reflect concerns with the provenance of <strong>food</strong>, a desire to reduce thedistance <strong>food</strong> has to travel before it is consumed, <strong>and</strong> a wish to reconnect with natureby growing more of the <strong>food</strong> one consumes. While these imperatives may be lesspressing than those facing city dwellers in developing countries, they reflect a set ofpreferences <strong>and</strong> motivations among city dwellers, which appear to be growing.(Ladner, 2011; Steel, 2008) as part of a wider movement to <strong>change</strong> <strong>urban</strong> lifestyles toless consumptive <strong>and</strong> more sustainable forms [for example Gleeson, 2009; slow cities,transition towns, etc.]. These broader dispositions help shape the prevailingconceptions of <strong>urban</strong> agriculture in Australia.4.1.4 How might <strong>urban</strong> agriculture contribute to greater <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>?There are few studies that attempt to measure systematically the impact of any <strong>urban</strong>agricultural activity in relation to broader notions of <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>. Indeed, as Burns(2004) notes,Currently, there are no known systematic reviews of the effectiveness of community<strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> interventions [...] There have been a small number of non-systematic<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 22
- Page 1 and 2: Synthesis and Integrative ResearchF
- Page 3 and 4: Published by the National Climate C
- Page 5 and 6: ABSTRACTFood security is increasing
- Page 7 and 8: 1. a review of the literature: on n
- Page 9 and 10: its Food for All project. This help
- Page 13 and 14: In response to the existential thre
- Page 15 and 16: 2. OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCHFood i
- Page 17 and 18: debates and to the more systematic
- Page 19 and 20: organisation in the past few years.
- Page 21 and 22: 4. RESULTSIn this section we presen
- Page 23 and 24: increasing productivity. Thus, whil
- Page 25 and 26: people and the origins of their foo
- Page 27 and 28: urban food supply chains. Thus, whi
- Page 29: This logistics system is dominated
- Page 33 and 34: esilient, powerful by being locally
- Page 35 and 36: volume or even its contribution to
- Page 37: community food growing can have on
- Page 40 and 41: generations this history has been f
- Page 42 and 43: a stronger focus on addressing the
- Page 44 and 45: The third key aspect is fairness -
- Page 46 and 47: climate (which we live and work in
- Page 48 and 49: agriculture. Eight percent is in ur
- Page 50 and 51: This concept of the ‘spaces in be
- Page 52 and 53: esearch scientist and chair of the
- Page 54 and 55: As discussed above, protection of t
- Page 56: 4.2.5 What is the extent and the im
- Page 60 and 61: no place under the panoply of pract
- Page 62 and 63: increased, the market dominance of
- Page 64 and 65: … the residents of S Park called
- Page 66 and 67: 5. CONCLUSIONSThere is growing conc
- Page 68 and 69: urban resilience. This inevitably c
- Page 70 and 71: In many respects these contrasting
- Page 72 and 73: Many interviewees of both standpoin
- Page 74 and 75: a given area. The rationale for thi
- Page 76 and 77: mapping the location of sources of
- Page 78 and 79: Australian food policy debates refl
- Page 80 and 81:
APPENDIX 1: URBAN FOOD SECURITY, UR
- Page 82 and 83:
IntroductionGlobally, and in Austra
- Page 84 and 85:
Review methodsThis stage of the res
- Page 86 and 87:
despite many of the causes of food
- Page 88 and 89:
…by 2050… food production will
- Page 90 and 91:
2. How is food security (in general
- Page 92 and 93:
the food security of cities, but no
- Page 94 and 95:
While some see the density of devel
- Page 96 and 97:
when suppliers, distributors, and c
- Page 98 and 99:
a more prominent role in enhancing
- Page 100 and 101:
community gardens webpage on the Co
- Page 102 and 103:
comprehensive description of the ca
- Page 104 and 105:
In both the developed and developin
- Page 106 and 107:
Their review notes a significant in
- Page 108 and 109:
lines of supply from often rural pl
- Page 110 and 111:
1 IntroductionCities have always be
- Page 112 and 113:
Despite some attempts to curb urban
- Page 114 and 115:
the Gold Coast remains a city that
- Page 116 and 117:
ackyard/community gardenernot affil
- Page 118 and 119:
level in local government. VicHealt
- Page 120:
Figure 2: Impacts on Municipal Food
- Page 125 and 126:
security I recognise that the cost
- Page 127 and 128:
United States, he offered the follo
- Page 129 and 130:
This vision highlights the multi-fu
- Page 131 and 132:
An environmental education centre.
- Page 133 and 134:
Melbourne Food ForestA Melbourne ga
- Page 135 and 136:
stakeholder consultations, the repo
- Page 137 and 138:
can. We sense the changes. The earl
- Page 139 and 140:
half-desert environments. We’re g
- Page 141 and 142:
etain its basic function and struct
- Page 143 and 144:
government; and that trying to get
- Page 145 and 146:
the north and the west, where it wo
- Page 147 and 148:
Why do people buy so much food that
- Page 149 and 150:
urban agriculture (however broadly
- Page 151 and 152:
enefits and risks. Before we can co
- Page 153 and 154:
Another important and tangible role
- Page 155 and 156:
coast without any problems whatsoev
- Page 157 and 158:
BIBLIOGRAPHYAECOM (2011) Scoping St
- Page 159 and 160:
Burns, C. I., A. (2007). Measuring
- Page 161 and 162:
Edwards, F., & Mercer, D. (2010). M
- Page 163 and 164:
James, S. O’Neill, P. and Dimeski
- Page 165 and 166:
Millar, R., 2012, ‘Government shi
- Page 167 and 168:
Saltmarsh, N. M., J; Longhurst, N.
- Page 169 and 170:
Walker B., 2008, Resilience Thinkin