Temple’s (2006) study of older Australians found that living arrangements, age<strong>and</strong> multiple long-term health problems were strongly associated with <strong>food</strong>in<strong>security</strong>. His more recent study (Temple, 2008) reports on a survey ofapproximately 19,500 people where 5% of respondents reported running out of<strong>food</strong> <strong>and</strong> not being able to purchase more, or skipping a meal as aconsequence.Nolan et al.’s (2006) survey of 1,719 South Western Sydney respondents alsofound significant levels of <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong>, with 16% of residents reportingexperiencing problems of <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong>. The main predictors of <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong>in households were the cost of <strong>food</strong>, capacity to save, the presence of childrenin the household, housing tenure <strong>and</strong> health status. Ability to access shops wasalso an inhibiting factor, particularly for people with disabilities, those with youngchildren <strong>and</strong> those without cars. While car ownership may or may not be relatedto relative poverty, it does suggest the concept of the ‘<strong>food</strong> desert’ hasrelevance in the Australian context (Conveney <strong>and</strong> O’Dwyer, 2009; Leete et al.,2012). Dodson <strong>and</strong> Sipe’s (2008) work on locational vulnerability in the face ofrising fuel <strong>and</strong> mortgage costs reinforces the fact that the traditional Australiansub<strong>urban</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape can exacerbate a variety of social <strong>and</strong> economic problemsfaced by poor households, including <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong>.4.1.1.2 Food <strong>and</strong> nutrition systemsThis recent research in the Australian context points not only to the social <strong>and</strong>economic determinants of <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, but also highlights rifts in the distribution of<strong>food</strong>. Inequitable distribution has been linked to a number of factors related to <strong>food</strong> <strong>and</strong>nutrition systems, including the concentration of power in the <strong>food</strong> supply chainsamongst retailers, <strong>food</strong> processors <strong>and</strong> wholesalers. Concerns have also been raisedabout the extent to which <strong>food</strong> is wasted, especially in the developed world, <strong>and</strong> theconnections of high levels of waste with retailer concentration, with estimates that onethird of all <strong>food</strong> produced is discarded (Gustavson et al., 2011). Research intosupermarket dominated supply chains reveals a system of ‘quality’ st<strong>and</strong>ards wherebyfresh <strong>food</strong> is often rejected on the basis simply of cosmetic appearance (Richards,Lawrence <strong>and</strong> Burch, 2011). In Australia, the Coles/Woolworths duopoly controlsaround 80% of the fresh <strong>food</strong> retail market (ACCC, 2008), leaving few alternativeoutlets for fresh <strong>food</strong> that does not meet their stringent st<strong>and</strong>ards on appearance ratherthan nutritional quality or seasonality.As mentioned in the introduction, more than half of the world’s population now lives incities. This <strong>urban</strong> population has, arguably, become increasingly disconnected from theorigins of the <strong>food</strong> it consumes, <strong>and</strong> increasingly reliant on a globalised economy ofmonetary ex<strong>change</strong>, futures trading <strong>and</strong> international regulation to access its <strong>food</strong>.<strong>Urban</strong> vulnerabilities are exacerbated when local economic resources are low, <strong>and</strong>when <strong>food</strong> grown outside of the city is compromised due to climatic variability <strong>and</strong>extreme weather events. Feeding growing city populations requires transporting <strong>food</strong>from beyond its boundaries, often from agricultural regions outside the metropolitanarea, <strong>and</strong> increasingly from countries beyond the referential frame of the recipient. Inshort, many <strong>urban</strong> consumers have little appreciation of where their <strong>food</strong> comes from,the conditions under which it is produced <strong>and</strong> the means by which it is transported totheir local shops. There are, however, signs that this is changing <strong>and</strong> that a growingnumber of consumers are more concerned with the provenance of their <strong>food</strong> <strong>and</strong> hencewith broader issues of <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>. Dixon (2011) refers to this disconnection between<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 15
people <strong>and</strong> the origins of their <strong>food</strong> as a metabolic rift, a disconnection <strong>and</strong> vulnerabilitythat was also highlighted during this project’s fieldwork in Melbourne <strong>and</strong> the GoldCoast.The recent report from the Commission on Sustainable Agriculture <strong>and</strong> ClimateChange (Beddington et al., 2011) chaired by Professor Sir John Beddington describesvividly the current state of global <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> <strong>and</strong> the converging threats from <strong>climate</strong><strong>change</strong>, population growth <strong>and</strong> the continued unsustainable use of natural resources<strong>and</strong> concludes,‘Business as usual in our globally interconnected <strong>food</strong> system will not bring us<strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> <strong>and</strong> environmental sustainability’ (p. 3)Instead the Commission recommends urgent <strong>and</strong> far reaching <strong>change</strong>,‘To reduce the effect of <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> on <strong>food</strong> supplies, livelihoods <strong>and</strong>economies, we must greatly increase adaptive capacity in agriculture...‘(p. 4)However, although recognising that the threats posed by <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> to <strong>food</strong>supplies ‘are likely to be spatially variable’ (p. 4), there is no reference at all to the<strong>urban</strong> dimensions of the problem, either in the growing concentration of the poor in<strong>urban</strong> settings or in the potential for some forms of agriculture to be based within citiesor their peri-<strong>urban</strong> fringes.Similarly, the Expert Working Group, commissioned by PMSEIC to investigate <strong>and</strong>report on Australian <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> devoted little time to the <strong>urban</strong> dimension of theproblem, although they did develop <strong>and</strong> articulate a more nuanced analysis of theproblem than earlier <strong>and</strong> simpler conceptions. In his foreword to their 2010 report onAustralian <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> in a changing world (PMSEIC, 2010:v), the chair of the expertworking group, Professor Peter Langridge noted that:In Australia, we have had an abundance of <strong>food</strong>. We can produce more <strong>food</strong> thanwe need <strong>and</strong> we have the resources to import <strong>food</strong> if necessary. However, wehave faced crises for specific <strong>food</strong>s, such as the banana shortage after TropicalCyclone Larry in 2006. Further, our <strong>food</strong> transport, distribution <strong>and</strong> storagesystems are vulnerable to disruption...Perhaps Australia’s most serious<strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> issue relates to the ways in which we consume <strong>and</strong> use <strong>food</strong>.(emphasis added)Thus, while the report acknowledges the significant vulnerability of Australianagriculture to <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> <strong>and</strong> variability, to increasing l<strong>and</strong> degradation <strong>and</strong> toincreasing reliance on imported fertilisers, it says little about the <strong>urban</strong> dimension tothese problems. There is however some recognition of the importance of betterengaging a broader spectrum of the community in building their appreciation of <strong>food</strong>,nutrition <strong>and</strong> supply chains. The logic of this approach is that by building greaterappreciation of the importance of <strong>food</strong> <strong>and</strong> especially of good quality <strong>and</strong> nutritious<strong>food</strong>, people’s dem<strong>and</strong> will drive innovation in the <strong>food</strong> production <strong>and</strong> processingsectors in a positive manner:<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 16
- Page 1 and 2: Synthesis and Integrative ResearchF
- Page 3 and 4: Published by the National Climate C
- Page 5 and 6: ABSTRACTFood security is increasing
- Page 7 and 8: 1. a review of the literature: on n
- Page 9 and 10: its Food for All project. This help
- Page 13 and 14: In response to the existential thre
- Page 15 and 16: 2. OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCHFood i
- Page 17 and 18: debates and to the more systematic
- Page 19 and 20: organisation in the past few years.
- Page 21 and 22: 4. RESULTSIn this section we presen
- Page 23: increasing productivity. Thus, whil
- Page 27 and 28: urban food supply chains. Thus, whi
- Page 29 and 30: This logistics system is dominated
- Page 31 and 32: Like Hodgson et al., as per definit
- Page 33 and 34: esilient, powerful by being locally
- Page 35 and 36: volume or even its contribution to
- Page 37: community food growing can have on
- Page 40 and 41: generations this history has been f
- Page 42 and 43: a stronger focus on addressing the
- Page 44 and 45: The third key aspect is fairness -
- Page 46 and 47: climate (which we live and work in
- Page 48 and 49: agriculture. Eight percent is in ur
- Page 50 and 51: This concept of the ‘spaces in be
- Page 52 and 53: esearch scientist and chair of the
- Page 54 and 55: As discussed above, protection of t
- Page 56: 4.2.5 What is the extent and the im
- Page 60 and 61: no place under the panoply of pract
- Page 62 and 63: increased, the market dominance of
- Page 64 and 65: … the residents of S Park called
- Page 66 and 67: 5. CONCLUSIONSThere is growing conc
- Page 68 and 69: urban resilience. This inevitably c
- Page 70 and 71: In many respects these contrasting
- Page 72 and 73: Many interviewees of both standpoin
- Page 74 and 75:
a given area. The rationale for thi
- Page 76 and 77:
mapping the location of sources of
- Page 78 and 79:
Australian food policy debates refl
- Page 80 and 81:
APPENDIX 1: URBAN FOOD SECURITY, UR
- Page 82 and 83:
IntroductionGlobally, and in Austra
- Page 84 and 85:
Review methodsThis stage of the res
- Page 86 and 87:
despite many of the causes of food
- Page 88 and 89:
…by 2050… food production will
- Page 90 and 91:
2. How is food security (in general
- Page 92 and 93:
the food security of cities, but no
- Page 94 and 95:
While some see the density of devel
- Page 96 and 97:
when suppliers, distributors, and c
- Page 98 and 99:
a more prominent role in enhancing
- Page 100 and 101:
community gardens webpage on the Co
- Page 102 and 103:
comprehensive description of the ca
- Page 104 and 105:
In both the developed and developin
- Page 106 and 107:
Their review notes a significant in
- Page 108 and 109:
lines of supply from often rural pl
- Page 110 and 111:
1 IntroductionCities have always be
- Page 112 and 113:
Despite some attempts to curb urban
- Page 114 and 115:
the Gold Coast remains a city that
- Page 116 and 117:
ackyard/community gardenernot affil
- Page 118 and 119:
level in local government. VicHealt
- Page 120:
Figure 2: Impacts on Municipal Food
- Page 125 and 126:
security I recognise that the cost
- Page 127 and 128:
United States, he offered the follo
- Page 129 and 130:
This vision highlights the multi-fu
- Page 131 and 132:
An environmental education centre.
- Page 133 and 134:
Melbourne Food ForestA Melbourne ga
- Page 135 and 136:
stakeholder consultations, the repo
- Page 137 and 138:
can. We sense the changes. The earl
- Page 139 and 140:
half-desert environments. We’re g
- Page 141 and 142:
etain its basic function and struct
- Page 143 and 144:
government; and that trying to get
- Page 145 and 146:
the north and the west, where it wo
- Page 147 and 148:
Why do people buy so much food that
- Page 149 and 150:
urban agriculture (however broadly
- Page 151 and 152:
enefits and risks. Before we can co
- Page 153 and 154:
Another important and tangible role
- Page 155 and 156:
coast without any problems whatsoev
- Page 157 and 158:
BIBLIOGRAPHYAECOM (2011) Scoping St
- Page 159 and 160:
Burns, C. I., A. (2007). Measuring
- Page 161 and 162:
Edwards, F., & Mercer, D. (2010). M
- Page 163 and 164:
James, S. O’Neill, P. and Dimeski
- Page 165 and 166:
Millar, R., 2012, ‘Government shi
- Page 167 and 168:
Saltmarsh, N. M., J; Longhurst, N.
- Page 169 and 170:
Walker B., 2008, Resilience Thinkin