11.07.2015 Views

Urban food security, urban resilience and climate change - weADAPT

Urban food security, urban resilience and climate change - weADAPT

Urban food security, urban resilience and climate change - weADAPT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> supply chains. Thus, while the effects of more variable rainfall patterns,more very hot days, more severe storms <strong>and</strong> changing patterns of vector bornediseases are likely to have profound effects on traditional agricultural practices ingeneral, they will also affect <strong>urban</strong> agriculture.In Australia, the <strong>climate</strong> projections from the CSIRO <strong>and</strong> the Bureau of Meteorology(CSIRO 2007) show which elements of significance to agriculture will <strong>change</strong> mostunder <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>. The National Food Plan consultation document (DAFF, 2011)presents projections which show that: Temperatures in Australia could increase by 2.2°C to 5°C by 2070;Annual rainfall in south-west Australia could reduce by up to 10%, <strong>and</strong> by 2 to5% elsewhere in southern Australia;Drought occurrence could increase over most of Australia, but particularly insouth-west Australia;Australia‘s <strong>climate</strong> will remain highly variable with the early effects of <strong>climate</strong><strong>change</strong> being felt through gradual <strong>change</strong>s in mean temperature, as well asthrough likely <strong>change</strong>s in the frequency, duration <strong>and</strong>/or intensity of extremeevents, such as droughts, heatwaves, fires <strong>and</strong> floods;Although there may be more dry days, when it does rain, rainfall may be heavierthan previously experienced in the region;Hot days <strong>and</strong> warm nights are projected to become more frequent.Climate <strong>change</strong>s are likely to affect agriculture productivity in a number of ways, due toplant <strong>and</strong> animal heat stress, less predictable seasons, crop <strong>and</strong> livestock losses fromflood <strong>and</strong> drought <strong>and</strong> <strong>change</strong>s in the regional suitability of certain production systems.One of the most significant reviews of <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> in Australia is included in the recentreport from PMSEIC (2010), entitled Australian <strong>and</strong> Food Security in a ChangingWorld. This notes that <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> will have a number of direct impacts on <strong>food</strong>production as a result of changing patterns of rainfall, more very hot days <strong>and</strong> soilerosion. However, there are also likely to be significant indirect effects such asdisruptions to supply lines as a result of floods, cyclones <strong>and</strong> more very hot days.Nonetheless, a government view as portrayed by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural<strong>and</strong> Resource Economics (ABARE) is relatively sanguine. While Australia’s economicoutput is likely to be affected by <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> effects on agriculture, in the long term,<strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> does not present a substantial physical threat to Australia’s physical<strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> (Sheales <strong>and</strong> Gunning-Grant, 2009). In addition, trade <strong>and</strong> participation inthe global economy is likely to continue to buffer the impact of threats to Australia’s<strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> (Moir <strong>and</strong> Morris, 2011).While the policy discourse is relatively stable around the findings of the CSIRO <strong>and</strong> theassumption that trade <strong>and</strong> open markets will prevent a <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> risk in Australia,an emerging body of scientific literature is providing a more nuanced <strong>and</strong> critical viewof the impacts of <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> compared to the government’s responses. Forexample, Bloom et al., (2010) show that as atmospheric CO2 rises, plants (in this case,wheat <strong>and</strong> Arabidopsis) will have more trouble absorbing nitrates into their tissues<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!