year of aquatic weed they tip into l<strong>and</strong>fill <strong>and</strong> so we've taken about 500 cubicmetres of that stuff so far; which is a significant amount <strong>and</strong> we compost it, aswell as using it in our garden beds. So it's diversion of waste streams to showpeople that what you can do here is that you can garden using stuff that's justhanging around <strong>and</strong> going into the tip [Micro Farmer, Gold Coast].The micro-business side of the venture involves the sale of vegetables grown on site,as well as compost <strong>and</strong> honey. They describe their approach as follows:We just try to grow what's in season. We stick to basically salad greens <strong>and</strong> stuffthat you can pile into the garden <strong>and</strong> make really productive <strong>and</strong> that's our majorstuff that we sell to the public, kale, lettuce, silverbeet, Chinese cabbage, rocket,mizuna; things like that. We've got beetroot now as well. We don't grow manycarrots. Carrots are too slow. Tomatoes we don't grow. The tomatoes are tooslow. Beans are too much trouble, so we grow beans for ourselves. We groweggplants, eggplants is good for the public because we've got some reallyproductive egg plants. But yeah, stuff that's quick <strong>and</strong> easy <strong>and</strong> yeah profitable[Micro farmer, Gold Coast].One of the most significant achievements of Gold Coast Permaculture is that all theirproduction happens on a site which they do not own. They approached a developerwhose l<strong>and</strong> was unused by occupied by squatters, <strong>and</strong> negotiated a deal in which theypay rent <strong>and</strong> use the l<strong>and</strong> for as long as it was not needed by the developer. When thedeveloper is ready to build on it, Gold Coast Permaculture will relocate at four months’notice allowing them to harvest the current crop <strong>and</strong> relocate their garden beds.In addition to this micro-enterprise, Gold Coast Permaculture offers a number of gardenbeds for the community to use as their own community garden, <strong>and</strong> on weekends theyoffer courses, workshops <strong>and</strong> community activities.The arc of suburbs within the local government areas of the cities of Yarra <strong>and</strong> Darebinwere described as ‘hot-beds’ of <strong>urban</strong> agriculture activity <strong>and</strong> local <strong>food</strong> production.The cities of Maribyrnong <strong>and</strong> Port Phillip also have considerable levels of activity, withthe former focusing on <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> <strong>and</strong> the latter on community <strong>food</strong> growing.Non-commercial <strong>urban</strong> agriculture is often understood solely in terms of communitygardens, but as the literature review <strong>and</strong> the case studies have revealed, it is farbroader than that. A notable practice to emerge in Melbourne <strong>and</strong>, to a lesser extent,the Gold Coast in the past few years is the permablitzing movement; permablitz beinga combination of ‘permaculture’ <strong>and</strong> ‘backyard blitz’. This is usually an informalgathering over the course of a day in which a group of people come together to: createor add to edible gardens where someone lives; share skills related to permaculture <strong>and</strong>sustainable living; build community networks; <strong>and</strong> have fun.Over 100 permablitzes have now been held in Melbourne, <strong>and</strong> the movement hasspread interstate <strong>and</strong> overseas. On the Gold Coast, the permablitz movement isstarting to gain momentum, but it still lacks the numbers that Melbourne enjoys, withless than 10 permablitzes taking place to date.<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 123
Melbourne Food ForestA Melbourne gardener, known locally for his methodical <strong>and</strong> systematic approach, hasbuilt a backyard <strong>food</strong> forest, <strong>and</strong> has documented his progress: including speciesselection, plantings, climatic events <strong>and</strong> yields.This gardener was motivated to create a <strong>food</strong> forest because of the increased‘scepticism towards permaculture’ from horticulturalists in general:There was just too much doubt, too much dissenting opinion, about whether itcan really work. So I said, enough is enough, it’s time to call their bluff, <strong>and</strong> buildsomething that shows it really does work. [Backyard gardener <strong>and</strong>permaculturalist, Melbourne].As a working scientist (toxicologist), he set out to use his backyard as an experiment,to document in detail everything he did, <strong>and</strong> all his yields, in order to demonstrate thatbio-intensive gardening of this sort could be highly productive:I have no time or space for wild speculation. For me, my <strong>food</strong> forest was really toprove that the concept worked. As a scientist, if something’s scientific, thatmeans it’s repeatable [Backyard gardener <strong>and</strong> permaculturalist, Melbourne].He built his <strong>food</strong> forest on the ‘leached <strong>and</strong> lifeless’ soil of his 80m 2 back garden duringthe winter of 2008. He calls his method ‘backyard orchard culture’. Based around thecareful selection <strong>and</strong> strategic siting of a range of different tree species (31), it isinterspersed with numerous varieties of berries (21), herbs (90) <strong>and</strong> other perennials,with some space left for annual vegetables. Consistent with the permaculture <strong>food</strong>forest technique, he chose early, mid- <strong>and</strong> late fruiting varieties, because ‘this givesextended seasonal cropping – instead of having one tree produce a glut of fruit all overa few weeks, you can extend your cropping [over several months].’In terms of yields, he has documented approximately 200kgs per year, split 60 – 5 –35% between the trees, berries <strong>and</strong> vegetables. However, all his trees are a few yearsaway from maturity with a third not yet producing. He speculates that 500kg a year isfeasible once all the trees have reached maturity. Nevertheless, his current yieldequates to 14 tonnes per acre.The South Melbourne CommonsThis is the result of a unique collaboration between the Catholic Archdiocese of SouthMelbourne, <strong>and</strong> Friends of the Earth. Located in South Melbourne, in the premises of aretro-fitted 19 th century Catholic girls’ school, the South Melbourne Commons is amulti-functional site combining 900m 2 of communal vegetable beds, a whole<strong>food</strong>s café,a <strong>food</strong> co-op, a hall for events <strong>and</strong> community hire, <strong>and</strong> a social enterprise (pre-schoolplay group). One of the volunteers commented that this project involved ‘a number ofinter-related <strong>and</strong> inter-connected things happening at one site, all of which wouldcontribute to a self-sustaining venture’.CERES Fair Food ProjectAn off-shoot of the CERES Environmental Education Park in Brunswick, the CERESFair Food Project was described as an outst<strong>and</strong>ing example of community-led <strong>urban</strong>agriculture in Melbourne operating over the last thirty years. CERES Fair Food is a<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 124
- Page 1 and 2:
Synthesis and Integrative ResearchF
- Page 3 and 4:
Published by the National Climate C
- Page 5 and 6:
ABSTRACTFood security is increasing
- Page 7 and 8:
1. a review of the literature: on n
- Page 9 and 10:
its Food for All project. This help
- Page 13 and 14:
In response to the existential thre
- Page 15 and 16:
2. OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCHFood i
- Page 17 and 18:
debates and to the more systematic
- Page 19 and 20:
organisation in the past few years.
- Page 21 and 22:
4. RESULTSIn this section we presen
- Page 23 and 24:
increasing productivity. Thus, whil
- Page 25 and 26:
people and the origins of their foo
- Page 27 and 28:
urban food supply chains. Thus, whi
- Page 29 and 30:
This logistics system is dominated
- Page 31 and 32:
Like Hodgson et al., as per definit
- Page 33 and 34:
esilient, powerful by being locally
- Page 35 and 36:
volume or even its contribution to
- Page 37:
community food growing can have on
- Page 40 and 41:
generations this history has been f
- Page 42 and 43:
a stronger focus on addressing the
- Page 44 and 45:
The third key aspect is fairness -
- Page 46 and 47:
climate (which we live and work in
- Page 48 and 49:
agriculture. Eight percent is in ur
- Page 50 and 51:
This concept of the ‘spaces in be
- Page 52 and 53:
esearch scientist and chair of the
- Page 54 and 55:
As discussed above, protection of t
- Page 56:
4.2.5 What is the extent and the im
- Page 60 and 61:
no place under the panoply of pract
- Page 62 and 63:
increased, the market dominance of
- Page 64 and 65:
… the residents of S Park called
- Page 66 and 67:
5. CONCLUSIONSThere is growing conc
- Page 68 and 69:
urban resilience. This inevitably c
- Page 70 and 71:
In many respects these contrasting
- Page 72 and 73:
Many interviewees of both standpoin
- Page 74 and 75:
a given area. The rationale for thi
- Page 76 and 77:
mapping the location of sources of
- Page 78 and 79:
Australian food policy debates refl
- Page 80 and 81:
APPENDIX 1: URBAN FOOD SECURITY, UR
- Page 82 and 83: IntroductionGlobally, and in Austra
- Page 84 and 85: Review methodsThis stage of the res
- Page 86 and 87: despite many of the causes of food
- Page 88 and 89: …by 2050… food production will
- Page 90 and 91: 2. How is food security (in general
- Page 92 and 93: the food security of cities, but no
- Page 94 and 95: While some see the density of devel
- Page 96 and 97: when suppliers, distributors, and c
- Page 98 and 99: a more prominent role in enhancing
- Page 100 and 101: community gardens webpage on the Co
- Page 102 and 103: comprehensive description of the ca
- Page 104 and 105: In both the developed and developin
- Page 106 and 107: Their review notes a significant in
- Page 108 and 109: lines of supply from often rural pl
- Page 110 and 111: 1 IntroductionCities have always be
- Page 112 and 113: Despite some attempts to curb urban
- Page 114 and 115: the Gold Coast remains a city that
- Page 116 and 117: ackyard/community gardenernot affil
- Page 118 and 119: level in local government. VicHealt
- Page 120: Figure 2: Impacts on Municipal Food
- Page 125 and 126: security I recognise that the cost
- Page 127 and 128: United States, he offered the follo
- Page 129 and 130: This vision highlights the multi-fu
- Page 131: An environmental education centre.
- Page 135 and 136: stakeholder consultations, the repo
- Page 137 and 138: can. We sense the changes. The earl
- Page 139 and 140: half-desert environments. We’re g
- Page 141 and 142: etain its basic function and struct
- Page 143 and 144: government; and that trying to get
- Page 145 and 146: the north and the west, where it wo
- Page 147 and 148: Why do people buy so much food that
- Page 149 and 150: urban agriculture (however broadly
- Page 151 and 152: enefits and risks. Before we can co
- Page 153 and 154: Another important and tangible role
- Page 155 and 156: coast without any problems whatsoev
- Page 157 and 158: BIBLIOGRAPHYAECOM (2011) Scoping St
- Page 159 and 160: Burns, C. I., A. (2007). Measuring
- Page 161 and 162: Edwards, F., & Mercer, D. (2010). M
- Page 163 and 164: James, S. O’Neill, P. and Dimeski
- Page 165 and 166: Millar, R., 2012, ‘Government shi
- Page 167 and 168: Saltmarsh, N. M., J; Longhurst, N.
- Page 169 and 170: Walker B., 2008, Resilience Thinkin