110 AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL FALL <strong>2006</strong>positively. Successful LIC operations require atruly joint effort in order to win the peace.The more <strong>Air</strong>men understand and train forLIC operations, the quicker and more efficientlythe United States can achieve victory. qNotes1. From 4 April to 15 September 2004, the 355thFighter Squadron, an A-10 unit in Bagram, Afghanistan,flew over 2,350 sorties, using weapons on just 100 of themfor an employment rate of 4 percent.2. Maj Gen Eric Olson, commander of Task <strong>Force</strong> 76and the 25th Infantry Division (Light), commented at theCAS symposium at Bagram in August 2004 that CASallowed him to violate the commandment of havingreserve forces available: “CAS is my reserve force.”3. Of the 2,350 missions flown by the 355th FighterSquadron from 4 April to 15 September 2004, only twoinvolved attacks by enemy forces while A-10s flew overhead.4. From 1 April to 15 September 2004, the number ofair support requests for ground-convoy escort greatlyincreased. In April, tasking for ground-convoy escort waslimited to special operations forces. By September themajority of these requests supported regular Army groundconvoys and comprised well over 25 percent of the daytimedaily flying schedule of the 355th Fighter Squadron.5. Joint Publication 3-09.3, Joint Tactics, Techniques,and Procedures for Close <strong>Air</strong> Support (CAS), 3 September2003 (incorporating change 1, 2 September 2005), ix.6. The following are two concrete examples for potentialimprovement in LIC CAS. First, at the National TrainingCenter (Fort Irwin, CA, proper), the residences andinfrastructure reside underneath airspace which could beused, with appropriate restrictions, for urban CAS trainingwithout live ordnance. In addition, on the non-forceon-forcedays at Fort Irwin, unique opportunities exist forconducting ground-convoy escort and training for LICobjectives. Second, similar opportunities present themselvesfor utilizing the infrastructure of Eielson AFB, AK,during the Cope Thunder exercise. Some coordinationbetween the Stryker Brigade at Fort Wainwright, AK, andthe 354th Fighter Wing has resulted in possibilities forurban-combat training with minimum impact to the base.
Clausewitz and the Falkland Islands<strong>Air</strong> WarMAJ RODOLFO PEREYRA, URUGUAYAN AIR FORCEEditorial Abstract: Major Pereyra applies Carl von Clausewitz’s classic ideas about warfareto analyze aerial operations in the Falklands/Malvinas War of 1982. The author’sstatus as an officer in the Fuerza Aérea Uruguaya (Uruguayan air force) affords hima unique perspective of that unfortunate clash between Argentina and Great Britain.Readers may profit from his examination of basic concepts such as center of gravity, friction,and the relationship between politics and military operations.THE FALKLAND ISLANDS WAR of1982 remains fresh in our memory,particularly in the minds of air forcepersonnel from Latin Americancountries. One can attribute this fact to severalfactors, such as the major role of one of thesecountries in the conflict, Latin America’s geographicalproximity to the area where the waroccurred, and the ability to gather informationfrom veterans. From a professional perspective,studying the war is attractive becauseof the dominant role of aerial combat in definingthe islands’ destiny. Specifically, interestfocuses on how the Fuerza Aérea Argentina(FAA) (Argentinian air force) and Navyair component managed to frighten the pres-111
- Page 2 and 3:
Chief of Staff, US Air ForceGen T.
- Page 4 and 5:
PIREPsJoint Airspace Management and
- Page 6 and 7:
APJInterdependenceKey to Our Common
- Page 8 and 9:
6 AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL FALL 20
- Page 10 and 11:
APJLT COL PAUL D. B ERG , USAF, CHI
- Page 12 and 13:
10 AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL FALL 2
- Page 14 and 15:
ASPJLT COL PAUL D. B ERG , USAF, CH
- Page 16 and 17:
True to form, the Air Force has res
- Page 18 and 19:
Red Flag Still Matters—After AllT
- Page 20 and 21:
Integration of Space-BasedCombat Sy
- Page 22 and 23:
est alternative. In other cases, un
- Page 25 and 26:
power projection, but advances in a
- Page 27 and 28:
3. Report of the Commission to Asse
- Page 29 and 30:
PIREP 27ized, programmed, funded, a
- Page 31 and 32:
PIREP 29creation of ACMs. One antic
- Page 33 and 34:
PIREP 31Link 16 and Joint Airspace
- Page 35 and 36:
PIREP 33Missile Defense Systems, th
- Page 37 and 38:
CADRE’s Professional EducationOpp
- Page 39 and 40:
ASPJQuick-LookThe Air Force Needs N
- Page 41 and 42:
QUICK-LOOK 39system should become a
- Page 43 and 44:
APJThe Air Force’s New Ground War
- Page 45 and 46:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 43
- Page 47 and 48:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 45
- Page 49 and 50:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 47
- Page 51 and 52:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 49
- Page 53 and 54:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 51
- Page 55 and 56:
New USAF Doctrine PublicationAir Fo
- Page 57 and 58:
Counterinsurgency AirpowerAir-Groun
- Page 59 and 60:
COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 57ticula
- Page 61 and 62: COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 59and Ai
- Page 63 and 64: COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 61The af
- Page 65 and 66: COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 63squadr
- Page 67 and 68: ASPJQuick-LookA New Operational Ass
- Page 69 and 70: QUICK-LOOK 67den on the OAT. First,
- Page 71 and 72: Filling the Stealth Gap and Enhanci
- Page 73 and 74: FILLING THE STEALTH GAP 71Each of t
- Page 75 and 76: FILLING THE STEALTH GAP 73the US wa
- Page 77 and 78: FILLING THE STEALTH GAP 75mit the F
- Page 79 and 80: Space PowerAn Ill-Suited SpaceStrat
- Page 81 and 82: SPACE POWER 79by using a more encom
- Page 83 and 84: SPACE POWER 81role of offensive and
- Page 85 and 86: SPACE POWER 83achieve supremacy in
- Page 87 and 88: Military TransformationEnds,Ways, a
- Page 89 and 90: MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 87to organi
- Page 91 and 92: MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 89course, w
- Page 93 and 94: MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 91mind-set
- Page 95 and 96: MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 93sponding
- Page 97 and 98: NOTAM 95The document’s authors ha
- Page 99 and 100: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 101 and 102: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 103 and 104: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 105 and 106: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 107 and 108: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 109 and 110: ASPJQuick-LookThe Nature of Close A
- Page 111: QUICK-LOOK 109CAS missions. The pub
- Page 115 and 116: CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 117 and 118: CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 119 and 120: CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 121 and 122: CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 123 and 124: BOOK REVIEWS 121whose contributions
- Page 125 and 126: BOOK REVIEWS 123Franco: Soldier, Co
- Page 127 and 128: APJAir and Space Power Journal, the
- Page 129 and 130: CONTRIBUTORS 127Col Howard D. “Da
- Page 131: EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARDGen John A.