114 AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL FALL <strong>2006</strong>means, (2) driving back an invasion by usingpreviously embarked rapid-deployment amphibiousforces, and (3) recapturing the islandsmilitarily. The Joint Chiefs of Staff of the threeBritish military branches designed these coursesof action based on the assumption that Argentinawould occupy the islands, thus providingjustification to recapture them militarily, fulfillingthe British goal of establishing theFalkland Fortress and rendering moot furthernegotiations over the islands’ sovereignty.To Great Britain’s advantage, Adm SandyWoodward, commander of Task <strong>Force</strong> 317,charged with recapturing the islands, knew ofthe contingency plans since 1974 when heserved as assistant director of naval planningin the British Ministry of Defence. 13 The Britishdesigned their plans and combined eachelement in order to reduce the enemy’s combatcapabilities to the minimum. On 2 April1982, when Argentina launched Rosario—theamphibious-landing operation in the Falklands—AdmiralWoodward received orders toimplement Operation Corporate. 14The fast British response astonished the Argentiniansbut did not alter popular opinion.Armed forces senior commanders, however,became deeply concerned about changing thepolitical goal from occupying to negotiate todefending the islands, and on 4 April theyanalyzed the situation at the highest level ofjoint operations. The Argentinian command,aware of Task <strong>Force</strong> 317’s size and operationalcapabilities (especially its amphibious forcesand likely application of a naval blockade usingnuclear submarines), ordered the largestpossible commitment of the FAA. In additionto performing all the tasks imposed by its doctrine,the air force would serve as Argentina’sonly means of linking the islands to the continentin case of a naval blockade. The broad,vague designation of air operations authorizedthe FAA to perform any mission it couldcarry out. For the ground defense of the islands,Argentina decided to increase the initialcadre of 500 men to 13,000, deployingthem by air during April. After Argentina’slack of a carefully studied defense plan becameevident, its military resorted to quickmeasures, conditioned to the speed with whichthe British forces reacted and the suddenchange in the political goal.Center of GravityClausewitz observes that “one must keep thedominant characteristics of both belligerentsin mind. Out of these characteristics a certaincenter of gravity develops, the hub of all powerand movement, on which everything depends.That is the point against which all our energiesshould be directed.” 15 Both forces hadclearly defined their centers of gravity. GreatBritain selected Port Stanley (briefly renamedPuerto Argentino) because it was the criticalcenter of the Falkland Islands and because theArgentinians had based the military commandresponsible for defending the islands there.British Task <strong>Force</strong> 317 consisted of 25,000men and a naval component of more than100 vessels. 16 Specifically, the fleet included40 warships: two aircraft carriers, three battlecruisers, nine destroyers, 20 frigates, twolanding craft, and four submarines. The remaining60 vessels were support units: six logisticallanding craft, 20 tankers, 13 cargoships, eight personnel carriers, two specialservicesvessels, three hospital ships, four tugboats,and four adapted fishing boats. Mostof the warships carried very modern and efficientelectronic gear, such as surveillanceradar, missile guidance-control radar, andidentification, friend or foe (IFF) as well aselectronic-countermeasures systems. The fleet’sair-defense weapons included long-range (upto 38 miles) Sea Dart missiles, Sea Wolf missilesfor attacking medium- and low-altitudetargets, Sea Cat missiles, and 20 mm and 40mm antiaircraft guns.As for British aviation, the Royal Navy’sFRS.1 Sea Harrier and the Royal <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong>’sHarrier GR3 served as the main combat aircraft,both featuring six weapon pods. The inboardpods carried 30 mm guns, the two intermediateones contained fuel tanks or bombs,and the outboard pods carried third-generationinfrared AIM-9L Sidewinder missiles with 90-to 120-degree fields of vision and an effectiverange of six miles. In addition to deploying
CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS AIR WAR 115this force 8,800 miles, on 12 April Great Britainestablished a total-exclusion zone—a circlewith a radius of 200 nautical miles—aroundthe Falklands.Designating the British fleet as the enemycenter of gravity for purposes of defendingthe islands, the Argentinians intended to harassthat force as far from the coast as possibleto prevent it from approaching the islandsand landing troops. Only the FAA could assumethat task because the ARA had to withdrawits fleet to the safety of the harbors afterthe nuclear submarine HMS Conqueror sankthe battle cruiser General Belgrano on 2 May. TheFAA and Naval Aviation Command providedthe Argentinian air assets, the former directlyattacking the British fleet and troops with theMirage III EA, Mirage 5 Dagger, A-4B/C Skyhawk,Canberra MK 62, and IA-58 Pucara, andthe latter employing the Super Etendard, A-4QSkyhawk, and Aermacchi MB-339.For the most part, these aircraft attackedsurface targets with conventional munitions,such as free-fall or parachute-retarded 250-,500-, and 1,000-pound bombs; 2.25- and 2.75-inch rockets; 20 mm and 30 mm cannons; and7.62 mm machine guns. Only the Super Etendardcould deliver the latest-generationweapon, the radar-guided 1,300-pound AM-39Exocet missile with a 30-mile range, but theArgentinians had an inventory of only fivemissiles. For air combat, only the Mirages hadmissile capability—the Matra 530 infraredmissiles with a six-mile range and visual fieldlimited to 30–40 degrees, which forced theaircraft to position itself behind an opponent.Thus, the Argentinian air component facedthe difficult challenge of overcoming technologicaland armament obstacles to reach itsobjectives, which brings to mind a Clausewitzianassertion: “That, however, does not implythat the political aim is a tyrant. It must adaptitself to its chosen means, a process which canradically change it; yet the political aim remainsthe first consideration. . . . Once theexpenditure of effort exceeds the value of thepolitical object, the object must be renouncedand peace must follow.” 17The DefensiveThe surprising British reaction of recapturingthe islands through military action forcedthe Argentinian military government to takeunplanned actions and adopt a defensive posture.The quick formation of Task <strong>Force</strong> 317,a product of the excellent British intelligenceservice’s alerting its government about the invasion,prompted General Galtieri to sendmore troops to the islands without consultingthe Joint Chiefs of Staff. The deployed forces,members of the 10th Mechanized InfantryBrigade (without its armored vehicles) andthe 3rd Infantry Brigade, joined the 5th MarineBrigade, based in the islands since the occupation,to form the ground defense. <strong>Air</strong>liftersflew more than 10,000 men and theirlogistical gear to the Falklands during April.Later we shall see how this decision negativelyaffected the course of the war.The Argentinians formed the Fuerza AéreaSur (FAS) (Southern air force), based in ComodoroRivadavia, on 5 April under the commandof Brig Gen Ernesto H. Crespo, who reporteddirectly to the military junta. Hecontrolled all aircraft designated by the FAAand Naval Aviation Command and based onthe continent. Vice Adm Juan Lombardo, theatercommander of South Atlantic operations, ledthe Argentinian naval units and the FalklandIslands garrison, the latter with Gen MarioMenendez of the Argentinian army. To defendthe islands, General Menendez had IA-58 Pucaraaircraft from the FAA and Aermacchi MB-339s and Mentor T-34Cs from Naval AviationCommand, in addition to ground units. Clearly,the Argentinian command’s organization conflictedwith principles of joint operations suchas centralized command, maximum integration,full use of forces, and mutual support.Clausewitz refers to the defense as the mostpowerful form of war, noting, “But if we arereally waging war, we must return the enemy’sblows; and these offensive acts in a defensivewar come under the heading of ‘defense’—inother words, our offensive takes place withinour own positions or theater of operations.Thus, a defensive campaign can be fought withoffensive battles, and in a defensive battle, we
- Page 2 and 3:
Chief of Staff, US Air ForceGen T.
- Page 4 and 5:
PIREPsJoint Airspace Management and
- Page 6 and 7:
APJInterdependenceKey to Our Common
- Page 8 and 9:
6 AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL FALL 20
- Page 10 and 11:
APJLT COL PAUL D. B ERG , USAF, CHI
- Page 12 and 13:
10 AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL FALL 2
- Page 14 and 15:
ASPJLT COL PAUL D. B ERG , USAF, CH
- Page 16 and 17:
True to form, the Air Force has res
- Page 18 and 19:
Red Flag Still Matters—After AllT
- Page 20 and 21:
Integration of Space-BasedCombat Sy
- Page 22 and 23:
est alternative. In other cases, un
- Page 25 and 26:
power projection, but advances in a
- Page 27 and 28:
3. Report of the Commission to Asse
- Page 29 and 30:
PIREP 27ized, programmed, funded, a
- Page 31 and 32:
PIREP 29creation of ACMs. One antic
- Page 33 and 34:
PIREP 31Link 16 and Joint Airspace
- Page 35 and 36:
PIREP 33Missile Defense Systems, th
- Page 37 and 38:
CADRE’s Professional EducationOpp
- Page 39 and 40:
ASPJQuick-LookThe Air Force Needs N
- Page 41 and 42:
QUICK-LOOK 39system should become a
- Page 43 and 44:
APJThe Air Force’s New Ground War
- Page 45 and 46:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 43
- Page 47 and 48:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 45
- Page 49 and 50:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 47
- Page 51 and 52:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 49
- Page 53 and 54:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 51
- Page 55 and 56:
New USAF Doctrine PublicationAir Fo
- Page 57 and 58:
Counterinsurgency AirpowerAir-Groun
- Page 59 and 60:
COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 57ticula
- Page 61 and 62:
COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 59and Ai
- Page 63 and 64:
COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 61The af
- Page 65 and 66: COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 63squadr
- Page 67 and 68: ASPJQuick-LookA New Operational Ass
- Page 69 and 70: QUICK-LOOK 67den on the OAT. First,
- Page 71 and 72: Filling the Stealth Gap and Enhanci
- Page 73 and 74: FILLING THE STEALTH GAP 71Each of t
- Page 75 and 76: FILLING THE STEALTH GAP 73the US wa
- Page 77 and 78: FILLING THE STEALTH GAP 75mit the F
- Page 79 and 80: Space PowerAn Ill-Suited SpaceStrat
- Page 81 and 82: SPACE POWER 79by using a more encom
- Page 83 and 84: SPACE POWER 81role of offensive and
- Page 85 and 86: SPACE POWER 83achieve supremacy in
- Page 87 and 88: Military TransformationEnds,Ways, a
- Page 89 and 90: MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 87to organi
- Page 91 and 92: MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 89course, w
- Page 93 and 94: MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 91mind-set
- Page 95 and 96: MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 93sponding
- Page 97 and 98: NOTAM 95The document’s authors ha
- Page 99 and 100: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 101 and 102: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 103 and 104: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 105 and 106: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 107 and 108: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 109 and 110: ASPJQuick-LookThe Nature of Close A
- Page 111 and 112: QUICK-LOOK 109CAS missions. The pub
- Page 113 and 114: Clausewitz and the Falkland Islands
- Page 115: CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 119 and 120: CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 121 and 122: CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 123 and 124: BOOK REVIEWS 121whose contributions
- Page 125 and 126: BOOK REVIEWS 123Franco: Soldier, Co
- Page 127 and 128: APJAir and Space Power Journal, the
- Page 129 and 130: CONTRIBUTORS 127Col Howard D. “Da
- Page 131: EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARDGen John A.