116 AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL FALL <strong>2006</strong>can employ our divisions offensively.” 18 Immediatelyafter taking charge of the FAS, GeneralCrespo ordered that the crews be trained toattack ships, using as a simulated target a modernType 42 Argentinian navy destroyer. Theresults were discouraging, suggesting that crewswould suffer 50 percent losses during attacks;nevertheless, the training continued until thewar started, and General Crespo proved thathe had the necessary intelligence and intuitivejudgment to confront the powerful enemy. 19Tactics and StrategyClausewitz wrote, “This gives rise to thecompletely different activity of planning andexecuting these engagements themselves, andof coordinating each of them with the othersin order to further the object of war. One hasbeen called tactics and the other strategy.” 20From this definition, we can conclude that theuse of tactics is only one way to employ strategyto achieve the political purpose of war. As indicatedpreviously, the Argentinians had assumeda defensive position, as expressed intheir political goal of “hold[ing] the islandsand fac[ing] the Royal Navy onslaught.” Towardsthis end, their strategy sought to preventthe British fleet from approaching thecoast and fulfilling its goal. Only the FAS couldcarry out that mission.But General Crespo encountered severalobstacles that prevented his forces from performingoptimally—some caused by a lack oftechnology and others by the command structure’sorganization. Take, for example, GeneralGaltieri’s arbitrary decision to dispatchmore troops while implementing the initialplan to defend the islands. This deploymentused all available transport airplanes—four C-130s and some F-27s. Unfortunately, the limitednumber of transport planes and the short5,500-foot runway at the Port Stanley airfieldprevented the deployment of artillery piecesor armored vehicles.General Galtieri’s deficient intelligence apparatusprevented him from sensing the needto enlarge Port Stanley’s landing strip so thatcombat aircraft could operate from there. 21The FAA had the means to perform theneeded construction work in a little morethan one week; indeed, had the lengtheningtaken place, the war might have turned outdifferently. 22 As it turned out, the FAS had tooperate from continental bases far away fromthe islands, including those at ComodoroRivadavia (540 miles), San Julián (440 miles),Río Gallegos (470 miles), Río Grande (430miles), and Trelew (625 miles), the last fourbases hosting combat aircraft like the MirageIII EA, Mirage 5, A-4B/C/Q Skyhawk, SuperEtendard, and Canberra. At Comodoro Rivadavia,the Argentinians stationed transport,tanker, surveillance, diversion, and searchand-rescueaircraft—specifically, C-130s, KC-130s, Learjet 35s, F-27s, and helicopters.From the Argentinian air fleet, only the A-4and Super Etendard could be air-refueled,something they had to do twice on each combatsortie. The distance between the bases andthe islands limited the operation of the MirageIII and Mirage 5 to a maximum of 10minutes, precluding the use of afterburners.This limitation prevented the Argentiniansfrom achieving air superiority over the islandsor offering air cover to missions beyond therange of interceptor airplanes. Furthermore,massed attacks against the British fleet provedimpossible because Argentina possessed onlytwo KC-130 tankers. 23 Despite these restrictions,the pilots scored important hits throughinventiveness and courage, making AdmiralWoodward doubtful about the war’s outcome:“In that stage, the war had become a fight betweenthe Royal Navy and the Argentinean <strong>Air</strong><strong>Force</strong> for the prize. Who was winning in thatprecise moment? I am afraid we were not.” 24On 1 May, the FAA’s baptism of fire occurredwhen it lost two Mirage III EAs and one Canberrain action, showing General Crespo thathigh-altitude attacks made Argentinian aircraftvulnerable to the British surveillance radarsand Harriers. Henceforth, operationstook place at low altitude, with aircraft flyingbarely over the waves. The Argentinians followedthis tactical procedure during the restof the conflict to defeat the technologicalshield protecting the British fleet.
CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS AIR WAR 117FrictionOne of Clausewitz’s most distinctive creationsis his notion of friction: “the only concept thatmore or less corresponds to the factors thatdistinguish real war from war on paper. Themilitary machine—the army and everythingrelated to it—is basically very simple andtherefore seems easy to manage. But we shouldbear in mind that none of its components is ofone piece: each part is composed of individuals,every one of whom retains his potential of friction.”25 Clausewitz regards factors such as danger,physical exertion, uncertainty, and chanceas pillars of friction because of their importanceand influence in all wars. 26 No doubt theArgentinian air component, from GeneralCrespo to the most junior pilot, would all experiencesuch friction.Constant danger characterized the war, especiallywhen Argentinian aircraft entered theBritish fleet’s radar-detection zone, where theyrisked encountering sophisticated missiles orHarriers and their deadly AIM-9L Sidewinders.Indeed, the British fleet downed 14 Argentinianplanes with missiles or antiaircraft artillery,and Harriers downed 19. One FAA veteranlater said, “Before the war I thought we had toteach combat pilots to fly formation, fire, andperform tactical navigation; later I understoodthat the most important thing was to teachthem to reach the target, reach it regardless offear of losing their own life, reach it no matterwhat.” 27 According to Clausewitz, the antidoteto danger is courage. 28 Their patriotism anddisdain of death allowed Argentinian pilots tosink six British ships and one landing craft,disable five ships, and damage 12 others (includingtwo aircraft carriers).The pilots also had to contend with exhaustion.Flying three- to four-hour combat sorties,including one hour spent skimming barelyabove the waves, and facing various risks affectedthe pilots’ normal reactions and reasoning;only their training allowed them toovercome this type of stress. After returningfrom his mission to attack the aircraft carrierInvincible on 30 May, Lt G. G. Isaac, an A-4 pilot,commented, “I also remember that I washot. Before that I did not feel it, but no matterhow minimal the symptoms were, I was relaxing.I wanted to shut the heat off, but when Itried to raise my hand from the throttle I realizedthat my arm did not respond. Such wasthe stress that it was stiff, disobedient. I didnot insist and tolerated the heat.” 29 After thisevent, he still had to air-refuel to return to hisbase. Of the four men sent on the mission, onlyLieutenant Isaac and one other pilot survived.At command level, uncertainty, which increaseswhen the enemy has more freedom ofmovement, keeps intelligence staffs awake.The Argentinians had only minimal surveillancecapabilities; however, in spite of theirpoorly prepared aircraft (B-707s, C-130s, andLR-35s), the crews’ navigation and pilotingskills enabled them to find numerous targetsduring their missions—for example, the discoveryon 21 April of Task <strong>Force</strong> 317 about1,900 miles off the Brazilian coast near Salvador,Bahia. Argentinian aircrews had torely on intuition because they lacked searchtechnology.Chance, another factor that increases uncertainty,permeated the conflict. Because the Argentinianshad few reconnaissance capabilitiesand only short-range radar (Westinghouse AN/TPS-43F) at the Falkland Islands informationand-controlcenter, they had to carry out blindattacks at sea. The FAA’s radar, the only longrange(225 miles) equipment in the Falklands,was designed for air surveillance, but its imageof the surface degraded with increasing distance,limiting the view over the ocean to 31miles. The following account illustrates Clausewitz’sobservation that intelligence and determinationmust overcome uncertainty andchance: 30 “The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> radar installed inPuerto Argentino started to record the arrivaland especially the departure paths of the SeaHarrier planes while on patrol and attackflights. . . . After tracking for several days, itwas determined that all planes vanished fromthe radar screen at similar directions and distances.The flights ended, evidently in a smallcircle where all lines met. The aircraft carrierwas in that circle.” 31 This tracking systemhelped the Argentinians plan their famed attackof 30 May against the Invincible.
- Page 2 and 3:
Chief of Staff, US Air ForceGen T.
- Page 4 and 5:
PIREPsJoint Airspace Management and
- Page 6 and 7:
APJInterdependenceKey to Our Common
- Page 8 and 9:
6 AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL FALL 20
- Page 10 and 11:
APJLT COL PAUL D. B ERG , USAF, CHI
- Page 12 and 13:
10 AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL FALL 2
- Page 14 and 15:
ASPJLT COL PAUL D. B ERG , USAF, CH
- Page 16 and 17:
True to form, the Air Force has res
- Page 18 and 19:
Red Flag Still Matters—After AllT
- Page 20 and 21:
Integration of Space-BasedCombat Sy
- Page 22 and 23:
est alternative. In other cases, un
- Page 25 and 26:
power projection, but advances in a
- Page 27 and 28:
3. Report of the Commission to Asse
- Page 29 and 30:
PIREP 27ized, programmed, funded, a
- Page 31 and 32:
PIREP 29creation of ACMs. One antic
- Page 33 and 34:
PIREP 31Link 16 and Joint Airspace
- Page 35 and 36:
PIREP 33Missile Defense Systems, th
- Page 37 and 38:
CADRE’s Professional EducationOpp
- Page 39 and 40:
ASPJQuick-LookThe Air Force Needs N
- Page 41 and 42:
QUICK-LOOK 39system should become a
- Page 43 and 44:
APJThe Air Force’s New Ground War
- Page 45 and 46:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 43
- Page 47 and 48:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 45
- Page 49 and 50:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 47
- Page 51 and 52:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 49
- Page 53 and 54:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 51
- Page 55 and 56:
New USAF Doctrine PublicationAir Fo
- Page 57 and 58:
Counterinsurgency AirpowerAir-Groun
- Page 59 and 60:
COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 57ticula
- Page 61 and 62:
COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 59and Ai
- Page 63 and 64:
COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 61The af
- Page 65 and 66:
COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 63squadr
- Page 67 and 68: ASPJQuick-LookA New Operational Ass
- Page 69 and 70: QUICK-LOOK 67den on the OAT. First,
- Page 71 and 72: Filling the Stealth Gap and Enhanci
- Page 73 and 74: FILLING THE STEALTH GAP 71Each of t
- Page 75 and 76: FILLING THE STEALTH GAP 73the US wa
- Page 77 and 78: FILLING THE STEALTH GAP 75mit the F
- Page 79 and 80: Space PowerAn Ill-Suited SpaceStrat
- Page 81 and 82: SPACE POWER 79by using a more encom
- Page 83 and 84: SPACE POWER 81role of offensive and
- Page 85 and 86: SPACE POWER 83achieve supremacy in
- Page 87 and 88: Military TransformationEnds,Ways, a
- Page 89 and 90: MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 87to organi
- Page 91 and 92: MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 89course, w
- Page 93 and 94: MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 91mind-set
- Page 95 and 96: MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 93sponding
- Page 97 and 98: NOTAM 95The document’s authors ha
- Page 99 and 100: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 101 and 102: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 103 and 104: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 105 and 106: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 107 and 108: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 109 and 110: ASPJQuick-LookThe Nature of Close A
- Page 111 and 112: QUICK-LOOK 109CAS missions. The pub
- Page 113 and 114: Clausewitz and the Falkland Islands
- Page 115 and 116: CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 117: CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 121 and 122: CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 123 and 124: BOOK REVIEWS 121whose contributions
- Page 125 and 126: BOOK REVIEWS 123Franco: Soldier, Co
- Page 127 and 128: APJAir and Space Power Journal, the
- Page 129 and 130: CONTRIBUTORS 127Col Howard D. “Da
- Page 131: EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARDGen John A.