APJInterdependenceKey to Our Common SuccessGEN TOM HOBBINS, USAFSINCE I TOOK command of US <strong>Air</strong><strong>Force</strong>s in Europe (USAFE) and ofNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization(NATO) <strong>Air</strong> Component CommandRamstein (CC-<strong>Air</strong> Ramstein), I have beenhighly impressed with both the commitmentand performance of the men and women ofthose extremely busy, continuously engagedcommands. Their level of activity and breadthof involvement are simply staggering. Our goalis to fly, fight, and win as a value-recognizedmember of an interdependent team of allies,services, and coalition partners. History hasproven that we are most successful when wecombine our capabilities to achieve commonsecurity interests.As I look to the future, I see only increasingopportunities to further develop and strengthenour interdependent relationships to addressfuture security challenges. USAFE is heavilyengaged with our sister services, allies, andpartners in forging an interdependent team.We’re making great strides in transformingour own USAFE operations to ensure we arepostured for both present and future challenges:reorganizing our headquarters, improving regionalinteraction and security through ourtheater security cooperation (TSC) programs,and integrating ground-component operationswith our own. NATO is undergoing profoundchanges as well: moving beyond its borders,committing to the International Security As-4
INTERDEPENDENCE5sistance <strong>Force</strong> (ISAF), and adopting a postureto support the NATO Response <strong>Force</strong> (NRF).USAFE is currently in the process of transformingits numbered air forces and restructuringits management headquarters to produceworld-class, full-spectrum, joint-war-fightingstructures linked together in a collaborativeplanningnetwork. USAFE’s new WarfightingHeadquarters (WFHQ) supports contingencyoperations theaterwide. As the combined/joint air component, the WFHQ serves as the<strong>Air</strong>man’s single voice to the combatant commander.Our WFHQ actively supports humanitarianand security operations within the areaof responsibility. In one operation, its memberstransported 404 Polisario Front prisonersof war (held captive for more than 20 years inAlgeria) back home to Morocco. In another,the WFHQ provided continuous securitymonitoringoperations for the <strong>2006</strong> WinterOlympics in Turin, Italy. Our headquarterssurveys and assesses potential operating locationsacross the entire area of responsibilityfor future engagements and training opportunities.From providing forces for NATO’s airpolicingefforts to medical teams for mannedspace-recovery operations in Kazakhstan, theWFHQ truly lives up to its name.At the same time, we stood up <strong>Air</strong> CommandEurope, our management headquarters, toexecute the daily “organize, train, and equip”mission, keeping our forces ready to providesovereign options to our leaders across thespectrum of conflict. By developing both awar-fighting and management headquarters,we support the combatant commander moreefficiently by leveraging technology and executingair, space, and cyberspace power withminimal transition from peacetime to fullcombatoperations. We are in transition towardhighly effective force presentations. Ianticipate more changes as we move from awar-fighting headquarters to a numbered-airforceconstruct that allows the combatantcommander to choose from both joint forcecommander and combined/joint force aircomponent commander leadership options.But USAFE’s focus does not stop at ourheadquarters. Continuous theater engagementand strategic presence remain one ofour goals, and our TSC program has provencritical in the global war on terrorism, deliveringoperational access for basing; increasingtraining opportunities; and enhancing intelligence,surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR)collaboration through the establishment ofcooperative relationships. In fiscal year 2005alone, USAFE conducted over 500 separateTSC events, engaging 66 of the 91 countries inour theater. Our engagements have producedtangible results as part of European Command’s(EUCOM) “move south and east” strategy. Onthe eastern front, we are heavily engaged withcountries such as Romania and Bulgaria—newNATO allies strategically located on the BlackSea, where 25 percent of Europe’s energy needstransit each day. In Romania, two years of hardwork by USAFE and EUCOM personnel culminatedin Secretary of State CondoleezzaRice’s signing the Defense Cooperation Agreementbetween our two nations. Such agreementsare forging the creation of the EasternEuropean Task <strong>Force</strong>, which will provide deploymentand training opportunities in theregion as well as bring together air and groundunits as part of a light, lean, lethal, and agileforce. Having such a force structure in EasternEurope has the additional benefit of servingas the template against which our newNATO allies can model their own transformationefforts.To the south, we are putting the “face ofAmerica” on humanitarian, ISR, and contingencyoperations in Africa. USAFE C-130s haveairlifted four battalions from Kigali, Rwanda,to the Darfur region in support of the AfricanUnion Mission in Sudan—another great, interdependenteffort. USAFE provides the airliftcapability, Rwanda provides the troops, andtogether we enable this mission to get off theground. We continuously engage with theState Department and EUCOM in OperationEnduring Freedom / Trans-Sahara. Throughmultiple TSC events, we assist willing partners(Algeria, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco,Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, and Tunisia) in theirstruggle to prevent the development of supportnetworks for terrorists. We do this by providingactionable intelligence to help host na-
- Page 2 and 3: Chief of Staff, US Air ForceGen T.
- Page 4 and 5: PIREPsJoint Airspace Management and
- Page 8 and 9: 6 AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL FALL 20
- Page 10 and 11: APJLT COL PAUL D. B ERG , USAF, CHI
- Page 12 and 13: 10 AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL FALL 2
- Page 14 and 15: ASPJLT COL PAUL D. B ERG , USAF, CH
- Page 16 and 17: True to form, the Air Force has res
- Page 18 and 19: Red Flag Still Matters—After AllT
- Page 20 and 21: Integration of Space-BasedCombat Sy
- Page 22 and 23: est alternative. In other cases, un
- Page 25 and 26: power projection, but advances in a
- Page 27 and 28: 3. Report of the Commission to Asse
- Page 29 and 30: PIREP 27ized, programmed, funded, a
- Page 31 and 32: PIREP 29creation of ACMs. One antic
- Page 33 and 34: PIREP 31Link 16 and Joint Airspace
- Page 35 and 36: PIREP 33Missile Defense Systems, th
- Page 37 and 38: CADRE’s Professional EducationOpp
- Page 39 and 40: ASPJQuick-LookThe Air Force Needs N
- Page 41 and 42: QUICK-LOOK 39system should become a
- Page 43 and 44: APJThe Air Force’s New Ground War
- Page 45 and 46: THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 43
- Page 47 and 48: THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 45
- Page 49 and 50: THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 47
- Page 51 and 52: THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 49
- Page 53 and 54: THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 51
- Page 55 and 56: New USAF Doctrine PublicationAir Fo
- Page 57 and 58:
Counterinsurgency AirpowerAir-Groun
- Page 59 and 60:
COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 57ticula
- Page 61 and 62:
COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 59and Ai
- Page 63 and 64:
COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 61The af
- Page 65 and 66:
COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 63squadr
- Page 67 and 68:
ASPJQuick-LookA New Operational Ass
- Page 69 and 70:
QUICK-LOOK 67den on the OAT. First,
- Page 71 and 72:
Filling the Stealth Gap and Enhanci
- Page 73 and 74:
FILLING THE STEALTH GAP 71Each of t
- Page 75 and 76:
FILLING THE STEALTH GAP 73the US wa
- Page 77 and 78:
FILLING THE STEALTH GAP 75mit the F
- Page 79 and 80:
Space PowerAn Ill-Suited SpaceStrat
- Page 81 and 82:
SPACE POWER 79by using a more encom
- Page 83 and 84:
SPACE POWER 81role of offensive and
- Page 85 and 86:
SPACE POWER 83achieve supremacy in
- Page 87 and 88:
Military TransformationEnds,Ways, a
- Page 89 and 90:
MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 87to organi
- Page 91 and 92:
MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 89course, w
- Page 93 and 94:
MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 91mind-set
- Page 95 and 96:
MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 93sponding
- Page 97 and 98:
NOTAM 95The document’s authors ha
- Page 99 and 100:
MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 101 and 102:
MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 103 and 104:
MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 105 and 106:
MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 107 and 108:
MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 109 and 110:
ASPJQuick-LookThe Nature of Close A
- Page 111 and 112:
QUICK-LOOK 109CAS missions. The pub
- Page 113 and 114:
Clausewitz and the Falkland Islands
- Page 115 and 116:
CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 117 and 118:
CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 119 and 120:
CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 121 and 122:
CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 123 and 124:
BOOK REVIEWS 121whose contributions
- Page 125 and 126:
BOOK REVIEWS 123Franco: Soldier, Co
- Page 127 and 128:
APJAir and Space Power Journal, the
- Page 129 and 130:
CONTRIBUTORS 127Col Howard D. “Da
- Page 131:
EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARDGen John A.