118 AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL FALL <strong>2006</strong>Moral <strong>Force</strong>sBetween 1 and 20 May, the war had twomain actors—the FAS and Task <strong>Force</strong> 317,each of which inflicted serious damage on theother. John F. Lehman, US secretary of theNavy, asserted in his report to Congress on 3February 1983 that “in spite of the heroic effortsby the Sea Harrier pilots, the Britishnever got anything close to air superiority overthe Falkland Islands.” 32 Argentinian aviationcontinued reaching its targets.At that time of the year, the British enjoyedan advantage caused by the weather and shortdaylight hours. <strong>Air</strong>planes could not even takeoff on 17 of the war’s 44 days because of adverseweather conditions and the availabilityof only nine hours of daylight. But the factorthat favored the British fleet most was thelarge number of Argentinian bombs that hittheir targets without exploding, perhaps becausethe low altitude and rapid delivery preventedthe fuses from functioning properly. 33Had the bombs detonated, the British fleetwould have perhaps met a different fate.On 21 May, the British took advantage ofbad weather conditions to start OperationSutton by landing 5,000 men at San CarlosBay. This time the changing weather did notwork to their advantage since conditions improvedquickly, facilitating attacks by Argentinianaviation and creating what the Britishcalled Bomb Alley. Attacks came from the continentand the islands, but British troops stillsecured a beachhead in San Carlos and its vicinityby 27 May. From this moment on, theconflict favored the British, but the FAS continuedattacking the fleet (e.g., the risky missionagainst the Invincible).As the British forces gained ground, Argentinianaviation focused on supporting its ownsurface forces with the goal of preventing theBritish from advancing and landing moretroops—for example, the sinking of a Britishlogistical landing ship and a landing boat, thedisabling of a landing ship, and the damagingof a frigate, all at Bahia Agradable. Argentinianaircraft also launched day and night attacksagainst command posts. The FAS operateduntil the war ended, and despite theconclusion of its basic mission and the imminenceof British victory, it sought to bolsterthe morale of ground forces resisting the finalBritish attack. On 13 June, one day before theArgentinian surrender, a C-130 landed in PortStanley to unload a 155 mm gun that wasnever used.The Argentinians’ inability to obtain timelyinformation, due to the deficient work of theintelligence-and-information center, preventedawareness of the real British situation whenthe FAS was executing its last mission. AdmiralWoodward described conditions aboard theaircraft carrier Hermes, 300 miles east of theislands on 13 June: “We are already at the limitof our possibilities, with only three warshipsfree of major operating problems (Hermes,Yarmouth, and Exeter). From the force of destroyersand frigates, forty five percent havebeen reduced to zero operating capacity.” 34The Argentinian air component had lost a totalof 74 airplanes, 33 of them in combat missions,in addition to 41 crew members whosacrificed their lives pursuing their country’sobjectives. Unfortunately for Argentina, theseindividuals did not have the correct situationalinformation (at the correct time) they neededto defeat one of the world’s most powerfuland technologically advanced fleets.ConclusionConsequently, it would be an obvious fallacyto imagine war between civilized peoples as resultingmerely from a rational act on the partof their governments and to conceive of war asgradually ridding itself of passion.—Carl von ClausewitzAs the Argentinian army’s chairman andchief of staff, General Galtieri was mainly responsiblefor the conflict but did not understandmodern joint military operations. Hedelayed air force involvement, thinking thata large, poorly armed ground force coulddefend itself. Vice Admiral Lombardo faredlittle better when he attempted to use airplanescapable of only limited combat to defendthe islands against the versatile Harriers
CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS AIR WAR 119armed with lethal Sidewinders and the Britishfleet’s other weapons and technology.Additionally, sending the cruiser ARA GeneralBelgrano against the British fleet withoutantisubmarine cover resulted in the war’sworst loss of life (321 men).Arbitrary changes in political goals withoutsound study by the senior staff to supportthe viability of the conflict and the absenceof a plan or strategy to achieve suchgoals demonstrated that General Galtieriand the military junta lacked the necessaryabilities to conduct a war—what Clausewitzcalled military genius. Only General Crespo,commander of the FAS, demonstrated abilityand professionalism, successfully overcomingtechnological differences, inadequate aircraftrange, and shortages of tankers andreconnaissance assets.However, none of his success would haveoccurred without the courage his pilots demonstratedon each mission. Courage in theface of danger, combined with patriotic sentiment,is often overlooked by military powersor thought to have been supplanted by technologicaladvances. In reality, it deserves considerationwhen an opponent’s desire to reacha set goal outweighs his physical and technologicalinferiority. The Argentinians’ use oflow-altitude attacks and only five Exocets ledthe prestigious and sophisticated British RoyalNavy to change its defense doctrine after thewar. Although this conflict in the South Atlanticbegan 150 years after the publicationof On War, this article demonstrates thatClausewitz’s philosophical concepts aboutwar serve as contemporary pillars that applyto any armed conflict. qNotes1. Carl von Clausewitz, On War, rev. ed., ed. and trans.Michael Howard and Peter Paret (Princeton, NJ: PrincetonUniversity Press, 1984), 87.2. Comodoro F. P. Matassi, Probado en Combate (Buenos<strong>Air</strong>es: Pio Matassi, 1994), 23.3. Nicanor Costa Méndez, Malvinas ésta es la Historia(Buenos <strong>Air</strong>es: Sudamericana, 1993), 25.4. Argentinian entrepreneur Constantino Davidoff arrivedon 19 March 1982 at Leith Harbor (South GeorgiaIsland) on the ARA Bahía Buen Suceso to take possession ofold whale-processing plants he had purchased in December1981. The Argentinian military supposedly includedsome commandos in Davidoff ’s party. Deeming this incidentpart of the Argentinian naval command’s OperationAlpha, the British government did not let Mr. Davidoff orhis personnel stay on the islands. See “Falklands WarRoundtable,” 15–16 May 2003, Miller Center of PublicAffairs: Presidential Oral History, http://millercenter.virginia.edu/programs/poh/falklands.html.5. Clausewitz, On War, 92.6. Dr. James S. Corum, “Poderío Aéreo Argentino enla Guerra de las Malvinas: Una Panorámica Operacional,”Aerospace <strong>Power</strong> Journal Español, second quarter 2002, 69.7. Matassi, Probado en Combate, 31.8. Cited in Christophe Swinarski, “Definición y ámbitode aplicación del Derecho Internacional Humanitario,”Revista Nacional de Derecho Aeronáutico y Espacial 3 (1989): 19.9. Clausewitz, On War, 89.10. Matassi, Probado en Combate, 32.11. Clausewitz, On War, 89.12. Ibid., 97.13. Adm Sandy Woodward, Los cien días (Buenos <strong>Air</strong>es:Sudamericana, 1992), 88.14. Ibid., 89.15. Clausewitz, On War, 595–96.16. B. H. Andrada, Guerra Aérea en las Malvinas (Buenos<strong>Air</strong>es: Emecé Editores, 1983), 29.17. Clausewitz, On War, 87, 92.18. Ibid., 357.19. Matassi, Probado en Combate, 27. The Military CommitteeResolution of 1969, regulating jurisdiction of thedifferent forces, transferred the air force’s air and marineoperations to the navy.20. Clausewitz, On War, 128.21. See Clausewitz’s discussion of intelligence in thesection “On Military Genius.” Ibid., 100–112.22. Corum, “Poderío Aéreo Argentino,” 83.23. Ibid., 75.24. Woodward, Los cien días, 281.25. Clausewitz, On War, 119.26. Ibid., 122.27. Capt Pablo Marcos Carballo, Halcones sobre Malvinas(Buenos <strong>Air</strong>es: Ediciones de Cruzamante, 1984), 17.28. Clausewitz, On War, 114.29. Matassi, Probado en Combate, 98.30. Clausewitz, On War, 100–112.31. Andrada, Guerra Aérea, 181.32. Cited in Matassi, Probado en Combate, 67.33. Carballo, Halcones sobre Malvinas, 171.34. Woodward, Los cien días, 339.
- Page 2 and 3:
Chief of Staff, US Air ForceGen T.
- Page 4 and 5:
PIREPsJoint Airspace Management and
- Page 6 and 7:
APJInterdependenceKey to Our Common
- Page 8 and 9:
6 AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL FALL 20
- Page 10 and 11:
APJLT COL PAUL D. B ERG , USAF, CHI
- Page 12 and 13:
10 AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL FALL 2
- Page 14 and 15:
ASPJLT COL PAUL D. B ERG , USAF, CH
- Page 16 and 17:
True to form, the Air Force has res
- Page 18 and 19:
Red Flag Still Matters—After AllT
- Page 20 and 21:
Integration of Space-BasedCombat Sy
- Page 22 and 23:
est alternative. In other cases, un
- Page 25 and 26:
power projection, but advances in a
- Page 27 and 28:
3. Report of the Commission to Asse
- Page 29 and 30:
PIREP 27ized, programmed, funded, a
- Page 31 and 32:
PIREP 29creation of ACMs. One antic
- Page 33 and 34:
PIREP 31Link 16 and Joint Airspace
- Page 35 and 36:
PIREP 33Missile Defense Systems, th
- Page 37 and 38:
CADRE’s Professional EducationOpp
- Page 39 and 40:
ASPJQuick-LookThe Air Force Needs N
- Page 41 and 42:
QUICK-LOOK 39system should become a
- Page 43 and 44:
APJThe Air Force’s New Ground War
- Page 45 and 46:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 43
- Page 47 and 48:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 45
- Page 49 and 50:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 47
- Page 51 and 52:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 49
- Page 53 and 54:
THE AIR FORCE’S NEW GROUND WAR 51
- Page 55 and 56:
New USAF Doctrine PublicationAir Fo
- Page 57 and 58:
Counterinsurgency AirpowerAir-Groun
- Page 59 and 60:
COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 57ticula
- Page 61 and 62:
COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 59and Ai
- Page 63 and 64:
COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 61The af
- Page 65 and 66:
COUNTERINSURGENCY AIRPOWER 63squadr
- Page 67 and 68:
ASPJQuick-LookA New Operational Ass
- Page 69 and 70: QUICK-LOOK 67den on the OAT. First,
- Page 71 and 72: Filling the Stealth Gap and Enhanci
- Page 73 and 74: FILLING THE STEALTH GAP 71Each of t
- Page 75 and 76: FILLING THE STEALTH GAP 73the US wa
- Page 77 and 78: FILLING THE STEALTH GAP 75mit the F
- Page 79 and 80: Space PowerAn Ill-Suited SpaceStrat
- Page 81 and 82: SPACE POWER 79by using a more encom
- Page 83 and 84: SPACE POWER 81role of offensive and
- Page 85 and 86: SPACE POWER 83achieve supremacy in
- Page 87 and 88: Military TransformationEnds,Ways, a
- Page 89 and 90: MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 87to organi
- Page 91 and 92: MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 89course, w
- Page 93 and 94: MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 91mind-set
- Page 95 and 96: MILITARY TRANSFORMATION 93sponding
- Page 97 and 98: NOTAM 95The document’s authors ha
- Page 99 and 100: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 101 and 102: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 103 and 104: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 105 and 106: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 107 and 108: MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY AND NATION
- Page 109 and 110: ASPJQuick-LookThe Nature of Close A
- Page 111 and 112: QUICK-LOOK 109CAS missions. The pub
- Page 113 and 114: Clausewitz and the Falkland Islands
- Page 115 and 116: CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 117 and 118: CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 119: CLAUSEWITZ AND THE FALKLAND ISLANDS
- Page 123 and 124: BOOK REVIEWS 121whose contributions
- Page 125 and 126: BOOK REVIEWS 123Franco: Soldier, Co
- Page 127 and 128: APJAir and Space Power Journal, the
- Page 129 and 130: CONTRIBUTORS 127Col Howard D. “Da
- Page 131: EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARDGen John A.