11.07.2015 Views

Fall 2006 - Air & Space Power Chronicle - Air Force Link

Fall 2006 - Air & Space Power Chronicle - Air Force Link

Fall 2006 - Air & Space Power Chronicle - Air Force Link

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PIREP 31<strong>Link</strong> 16 and Joint <strong>Air</strong>space Management andDeconflictionOne of the main input systems for the airpictureportion of the COP is information fedthrough <strong>Link</strong> 16, an improved data link usedto exchange near-real-time information (communication,navigation, and identification)that supports information exchange betweentactical C4I systems. One of the functions of<strong>Link</strong> 16 is to provide positive, friendly identification.<strong>Link</strong> 16 periodically transmits a cryptosecuredand precise participant location andidentification (PPLI) report, a considerableimprovement that can significantly reduce orprevent fratricide incidents. 9 Part of the PPLIincludes geodetic positioning which would beimportant to JASMAD applications. <strong>Link</strong> 16messages implement a three-dimensional geodeticcoordinate system using latitude, longitude,and altitude. This enables positions tobe reported anywhere in the world and is subjectonly to display and database limitations.The geodetic grid (GEOGRID) is always availableto participants. 10 Herein lies the potentialapplication for the JASMAD: this is very similarto the Mode 4 identification, friend or foe(IFF) function used for primary aircraft separationin a radar environment.How does one maintain positive control ofairborne objects once they pass the FEBA andenter the objective area? Positive control innoncombatant areas is maintained by airtraffic-controlagencies using radar identificationand/or Mode 4 IFF reporting. When oneoperates in a wartime environment, radar controlis rarely available, and aircraft normallyturn their Mode 4 equipment off for operationalsecurity. This is part of the reason whyACMs are developed and the daily ACO is produced.Aerial vehicles flying on the ATO maintainseparation by the procedural methodsestablished in the ACO (differing routes, altitudes,and times). In air-traffic-control jargon,this is referred to as “procedural separation.”Procedural separation is not as effective forutilizing the available airspace as positive control.Larger blocks of airspace must be reservedfor operations when flying objects cannotbe separated by positive control. If amethodology for providing positive control ina secure operating environment were developed,air operations could be planned withgreater accuracy, fratricide incidents could beless frequent, and more aircraft could fly inthe battlespace with greater safety. The combinationof the COP, JASMAD, JMPS, and <strong>Link</strong>16 offers the potential to provide this capabilityand much more.A weakness of the <strong>Link</strong> 16 concept to helpprovide positive control in the battlespace isthat not all aircraft and aerial vehicles flying inthe ATO have or will have <strong>Link</strong> 16 capabilitiesor a similar interface system. For example,AMC currently operates some aircraft that employaircraft communications and reportingsystems, and eventually all strategic mobilityaircraft will meet ICAO aviation requirementsthrough the CNS/ATM program. Neither ofthese systems is interoperable with <strong>Link</strong> 16,and neither is secure. Thus, many AMC aircraftare not and will not be equipped to respondto positive air traffic control in thebattlespace. AMC is currently staffing initiativesto remedy the situation. Additionally,the number of unmanned aerial systems operatingbelow the coordination altitude isgrowing at an astonishing rate. Currentlynone have any system similar to <strong>Link</strong> 16, andalthough this is being considered for a few,most will never have <strong>Link</strong> 16 or any similarreporting capability. Another problem withthis concept is that <strong>Link</strong> 16 operates on lineof sight and requires a persistent airborneplatform to provide the link. Given all ofthese drawbacks, a solution may becomeavailable in the form of near-space platforms,which offer the potential to solve both theline-of-sight and persistence problems.Near <strong>Space</strong> and Joint <strong>Air</strong>space Management andDeconflictionThe <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> <strong>Space</strong> Battlelab is planning toconduct a variety of experiments in the areaof near space over the next several years. Thegoal is to determine if near-space systems flyingat an altitude of about 30 kilometersabove Earth’s surface could perform a varietyof tactical missions, including battlefield-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!