the-evolution-of-international-security-studies

222 widening and deepening securitySTRATEGICSTUDIES(Cold Wartraditionalism)ArmsControlPEACERESEARCHNegativepeacePositivepeacePOST-COLD WARTRADITIONALISMMARXISTPEACE RESEARCHScandinavian andGerman PeaceResearchCritical PeaceResearchLIBERAL PEACE RESEARCHCOMMONSECURITYFEMINISMPOSTSTRUCTURALISMTHE COPENHAGENSCHOOLCONVENTIONALCONSTRUCTIVISMCRITICALCONSTRUCTIVISMPOST-COLONIALISMHUMANSECURITYSociologicalLinguisticCRITICAL SECURITYSTUDIESFigure 7.3.The evolution of ISSand journal publications and a growing number of graduate students andpost-docs to give expansion approaches momentum. Particular noteworthywere foundation support from the Social Science Research Counciland the MacArthur Foundation, for instance for The Culture of NationalSecurity (Katzenstein, 1996a). Other important Constructivist works thatlay further towards Critical Constructivism, such as Adler and Barnett’s(1998) Security Communities, were supported by the Global Studies Programat the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Carnegie Councilon Ethics and International Affairs. A specific and crucial source offunding was the MacArthur Foundation/Social Science Research Council’sInternational Peace and Security Fellowship programme. This programmeran from 1985 to 2000 and offered support for Security Studiesas a whole (217 dissertation and postdoctoral fellowships were awarded),but perhaps particularly for widening–deepening approaches in thatit funded such (later) prominent scholars as Ronnie Lipschutz, AlastairJohnston, Audie Klotz, Neta Crawford, Hugh Gusterson, ChristianReus-Smit, Michael Barnett, Martha Finnemore, Jonathan Mercer, Ido