12.07.2015 Views

the-evolution-of-international-security-studies

the-evolution-of-international-security-studies

the-evolution-of-international-security-studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eferences 337Oxenstierna, Maria T. (1999) ‘Revisiting <strong>the</strong> Global Response to NonproliferationViolations in Iraq: Tracing <strong>the</strong> Historical Political Roots’, ContemporarySecurity Policy, 20:2, 77–108.Paarlberg, Robert L. (2004) ‘Knowledge as Power: Science, Military Dominance,and US Security’, International Security, 29:1, 122–51.Pace, Michelle (2006) The Politics <strong>of</strong> Regional Identity: Meddling with <strong>the</strong> Mediterranean,London: Routledge.Pant, Harsh V. (2004) ‘The Moscow–Beijing–Delhi “Strategic Triangle”: An IdeaWhose Time May Never Come’, Security Dialogue, 35:3, 311–28.(2007) ‘The US–India Nuclear Deal: The Beginning <strong>of</strong> a Beautiful Relationship?’,Cambridge Review <strong>of</strong> International Affairs, 20:3, 455–72.Pape, Robert A. (1996) Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War, Ithaca:Cornell University Press.Paris, Roland (2001) ‘Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air?’, InternationalSecurity, 26:2, 87–102.Parmar, Inderjeet (2005) ’Catalysing Events, Think Tanks and American ForeignPolicy Shifts: A Comparative Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Impacts <strong>of</strong> Pearl Harbor 1941and 11 September 2001’, Government and Opposition, 40:1, 1–25.Pastusiak, Longin (1977) ‘Objective and Subjective Premises <strong>of</strong> Detente’, Journal <strong>of</strong>Peace Research, 14:2, 185–93.Pateman, Carol (1988) ‘Feminist Critiques <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Public/Private Dichotomy’, inStanley I. Benn and G. F. Gaus (eds.) Public and Private in Social Life,London:St Martin’s Press and Croom Helm, 118–40.Patomäki, Heikki (2001) ‘The Challenge <strong>of</strong> Critical Theories: Peace Research at <strong>the</strong>Start <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Century’, Journal <strong>of</strong> Peace Research, 38:6, 723–37.Paul, T. V. (2003) ‘Systemic Conditions and Security Cooperation: Explaining <strong>the</strong>Persistence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nuclear Non-proliferation Regime’, Cambridge Review <strong>of</strong>International Affairs, 16:1, 135–54.(2006) ‘Why has <strong>the</strong> India–Pakistan Rivalry been so Enduring? Power Asymmetryand an Intractable Conflict’, Security Studies, 15:4, 600–30.Paul, T. V. and Mahesh Shankar (2007) ‘Why <strong>the</strong> US–India Nuclear Accord is aGood Deal’, Survival, 49:4, 111–22.Payne, Keith B. (2000) ‘The Case for National Missile Defense’, Orbis, 44:2, 187–96.Pedatzur, Reuven (1994) ‘Evolving Ballistic Missile Capability and Theatre MissileDefence: The Israeli Predicament’, Security Studies, 3:3, 521–70.(2007) ‘The Iranian Nuclear Threat and <strong>the</strong> Israeli Options’, ContemporarySecurity Policy, 28:3, 513–41.Peoples, Columba (2006) ‘The Moral Obligation <strong>of</strong> Missile Defence? Preventive WarArgumentation and Ballistic Missile Defence Advocacy’, Cambridge Review<strong>of</strong> International Affairs, 19:3, 421–34.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!