The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

- 109 -fit^d m^anddVc -4nc„cI, (t) 12(1) ^ dlcls2x(dsi X a^))(27)d"FR =iiili^fll jds,x{dS2xar)^dS2x{ds,xar))2 28nc«c r8ne„crdl2(l)I|(l) —=— ds., x(dS2X aJ^ \ ^ ''dt+ 12(1) —'— clS2 X (ds 1X a^)dt|.,(28)In order to measure the force on an element of current I2d52 it isnecessary to integrate these expressions about a closed path with respect tods. However, we have previously*^ shown that for the Ampere-Weberexpression for the force between current elements, the result isthe Grassmann^'7 forceidentical for2dFcIl(t)l2(t)i . u-i ^(dS2x(ds,xar))4nz^cv;v(29)and for the Ampere force. Clearly the classical expression and theGrass mann expression always give forces perpendicular to the currentelement dS2. Therefore, in any closed circuit, it is impossible for the Ampereequation to produce any tangential component.Therefore, we must conclude that the only one of these threeformulations which can possibly explain the many experiments^ of Herring,Graneau and others which appear to prove the existence of tangential forcesis the modern relative velocity formulation. A detailed analysis of each ofthe crucial experiments should be carried out to see if the relative velocityformulation can quantitatively predict the tangential forces found by