The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

- 26ON THE ELECTRIC INTENSITIES INDUCED IN RAILGUNSStefanMarinovInstitute for Fundamental PhysicsMorellenfeldgasse 16A-8010 Graz, AustriaAbstract . I calculate the electric intensities induced at different points ofrailguns, proceeding from the fundamental Lorentz equation. I show that this calculationpredicts the observed induced tensions, contrary to the recent assertionof Graneau et al.^ ' that this cannot be done.With this paper I should like to comment on the paper of Graneau et al.^ \ who assertthat the electric intensities induced in railguns can be explained only proceedingfrom Ampere's formula for the interaction between current elements, while Grassmann'sformula, i.e., the Lorentz force formula, fails.Ifn my firm opinion the formula which explains all electromagnetic effects (of singlecharges and of current elements) is Grassmann's, i.e., Lorentz', formula. As it is wellknown, experimenta crucis that can choose which of these two formulas is the true onecan be done only by observing the interaction between non-closed circuits (for closedcircuits both formulas predict equal effects). At the present time such effects havebeen observed only by Graham and Lahoz' ' and by me' * ^. My experiments have led toviolation of the angular momentum conservation law (it is well known that Grassmanrfs formulaviolates Newton's third law), what cannot occur if Ampere's formula is the trueone, as it preserves Newton's third law. All proponents of Ampere's formula (the twoGraneaus, Pappas, Wesley, Assis, the recently converted Vigier^ ' etc.) are very wellacquainted with my Bul-Cub Machine without Stator^ ' and Rotating Ampere Bridge withDisplacement Current^ ' which have violated the angular momentum conservation law, butnobody has cormented on the effects observed by me. Only the critical analysis of thesemachines can resolve the Ampere-Grassmann controversy, which humanity failed to resolvein the last 150 years, although the way for solving this controversy has been indicatedby Grassmann himself, who wrote in his historical paper' '(p. 14):Oberhaupt ist klar, dass eine Entscheidung zwischen beiden Theorien (Ampere's