12.07.2015 Views

The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 256Concerning the MUller-Marinov machine, you write:Turning now to your machine, I do not understand why you think it adds anythingto any argument concerning relativity... May I stress that I do not discuss yourideas - I simply cannot tell from your presentation where the conflict lies betweenyour views and those <strong>of</strong> others.I assert (and I demonstrate this assertion with my machine) that when rotating themetal sticks keeping the magnetic belt at rest, an electric intensity is induced in thesticks according to the formula= (v/c)xrotA, (1)Wwhere ¥ is the velocity <strong>of</strong> the sticks and A is the magnetic potential originated by themagnetic belt at the space domain where the sticks are located.However, when the sticks are at rest and the belt rotates, there is NO induced tensioias in this case the induced electric intensity is to be calculated according to the formulaW-tr= (l/c)(v.grad)A, , (2)where v is the velocity <strong>of</strong> the magnetic belt, and, as formula (7) in my papee shows, formy machine E„^. 4.^ =^0.mot-tr<strong>The</strong>se two completely different effects and the competely different formulas (1) and(2) contradict the principle <strong>of</strong> relativity . For the second case relativity writes theWRONG formulaE = - (v/c)xrotA. (3)I beg you that in your answer you state which, according to you, is the right formulafor the second case: my formula (2) or the relativistic formula (3)? If you will notgive a clear answer by writing "formula (2)" or "formula (3)", you will give a demonstration<strong>of</strong> a concealment <strong>of</strong> the scientific <strong>truth</strong>.And I beg you not to try to juggle with subterfuge <strong>of</strong> inertial and rotational motion.You can take the magnetic belt in the form <strong>of</strong> RECTILINEAR "conveyor" belt where the motion<strong>of</strong> sticks or belt will be PERFECTLY INERTIAL. And another remark: <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong>presence <strong>of</strong> induced tension along the sticks will be detected by attaching golden leafletsat the ends <strong>of</strong> the sticks (as one does in the electrometers). I have used this methodin my inductive INERTIAL KENNARD EXPERIMENT (see TWT-IV) with whose help for aFOURTH time in the last 15 years I have measured the Earth's absolute velocity.I submit again my rejected paper, hoping that YOU will publish it.Enclosed are the covers <strong>of</strong> TWT-III, TWT-IV and TWT-VII which you can receive by sendingthe indicated prices.Hoping toreceive your answer soon.Sincerely yours,Stefan MarinovEditorial note . This letter remained without answer.Harinov's note . In his letter""^<strong>of</strong> the 11 May 1990 Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pippard beoged .^ me especially V J toNOT publish it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!