12.07.2015 Views

The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STEFAN MARINOV- 261 -'acta'^physJca'slovacaMorellenfeldgasseie 7 June 1990 Oubravska cesta 9CSFR-B^ 28 BratislavaA.80I0ORAZ- AUSTRIADear Dr. Kaluzny,Thank you very much for your letter <strong>of</strong> the 6 June, although I was unpleasantly shockedto read such a superficial opinion <strong>of</strong> the arbitrator on my paper PHYSICAL ESSENCE OF THEMAXWELL-LORENTZ EQUATIONS. I close the problem with the submission <strong>of</strong> this paper but Iwish to give expression by the present letter <strong>of</strong> my disaccord with the opinion <strong>of</strong> thearbitrator. <strong>The</strong> potentials (4) in my paper SATISFY the equations (10). I show THIS onp. 45 <strong>of</strong> my paper MAXWELL'S ILLUSION: THE DISPLACEMENT CURRENT which is now on examinationin your journal. I have the feeling that you have not handed to the referee alsothe other three papers which are now under examination in your journal. It is a pitybecause in these papers I describe in detail my experiments with which I show that Maxwell'sdisplacement current is NO current, that circuits with condensers are NON-CLOSEDcircuits, and with such circuits I demonstrated violation <strong>of</strong> the angular momentum conservationlaw. <strong>The</strong> problems (better to say the SOLUTIONS) which I bring to the attention<strong>of</strong> the scientific community are <strong>of</strong> a too great importance and it is highly inappropriateto reject my papers with such a kind <strong>of</strong> motivation as that presented in the report <strong>of</strong>your arbitrator.To show to your arbitrator the extent <strong>of</strong> my research, I send him (and I grant to him)the fifth volume <strong>of</strong> my encyclopaedic work CLASSICAL PHYSICS. I give to him the adviceto read Chapter V and to see that the potentials with which one must calculate ALL electromagneticeffects are the potentials AT THE MOMENT OF OBSERVATION and not, as it iscommonly WRONGLY accepted, the potentials at the RETARDED moment (which, as a matter <strong>of</strong>fact must be called ADVANCED moment, as I do in my theory). <strong>The</strong> big error <strong>of</strong> conventionalphysics is that it takes the magnetic potential in the form A = qv'/r'(c - n'.v'), whereall primed quantities are taken at the moment t' = t - r'/c, called by me advanced, asit is previous to the moment <strong>of</strong> observation t. Meanwhile the right formula isA = qv/cr = q(v' + r'u'/c)/r'(c - n'.v'). Only working with MY form one obtains the Lorentzfrictional forces (the radiation reaction "field") by AUTOMATICAL calculation andone has not to make artificial calculation leading to the so-called "self-acceleration",as one does in the conventional theories.Hoping to receive your decision on my other three papers submitted on the 16 Marchin a due time, A ll tSincerely yours, 'J, JJM^^ Stefan MarinovEditorial note. Dr. Kaluzny answers this letter with his letter <strong>of</strong> the 29 June 1990.?>*§iif ^.^t;*

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!