The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

'r^fvv- 208 -r. 16 March 1990 P:;.^;..!!;!"^^'*. .J:x''^r. .^ AMcVniAACTA PHYSICA SLOVACAA.80I0 GRA. - AUSFRIADubravska cesta 9Tel. 0316/377093 CSR-842 28 BratislavaDear Dr.Kaluzny,Thank you very much for your letter of the 12 March 1990, although the rejection ofmy paperPHYSICAL ESSENCE OF THE MAXWELL-LORENTZ EQUATIONSwas not, of course, pleasant for me.I found a very well written referee's report (what is not the case with the otherphysical journals as PHYS. REV., J. PHYS., IL NUOVO CIMENTO, etc.), however, unfortunatly, the concepts of the referee (and of conventional physics) are WRONG. I give apartmy objections to the referee's comments. In the light of these comments, I allow me tosubmit again my paper and to. ask that you give the whole correspondence to an arbitratewhohas to decide publication or rejection. In the case of publication, I should invitethe referee to appear with a criticism on my concepts and experiments in the press.Almost all referees who criticize my papers do not know the whole extent of my theoreticaland experimental research and think that I do some "student" errors. To makemore clear to you and to your referees the extent of my reasearch in the last 30 years,I submit to ACTA PHYSICA SLOVACA also the following THREE papers:1. VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OF CONSERVATION OF ANGULAR MOMENTUM AND ENERGY.?^ 2. REPETITION OF WHITEHEAD'S EXPERIMENT FOR DEMONSTRATING THATDISPLACEMENT CURRENT IS A PURE MATHEMATICAL FICTION.3. MAXWELL'S ILLUSION: THE DISPLACEMENT CURRENT.Of course, you can publish only one or two of these papers, but I should like thatthe referee and the arbitrator have all three papers under the hand.I should like to note that I am an "old friend" of Czechoslovakia where I spent some'of my most happy years. I send you two newspaper clippings on my demonstration on Venceslaosquare in 1978 and two Czech poems from my collection of poems LIST OTBRULEN,edited in Washington, D.C. in 1978. I am in contact with the CZECH. J. PHYSICS since20 years and I visited twice its editorial office and my referee Dr. Josef Langer inPrague (in 1978 and in 1979). On the other hand Bratislava is so near to Austria thatone can say, we are in the same boat (your letter of the 12 March was received by me onthe 14 March).I have little hopes that you will publish a paper of me. But the recent events inCzechoslovakia have shown that every one of us, on the place on which one is, must takeALONE decisions thinking with his own head. Otherwise society falls in stagnation. Theonly authority in life (and in science) is the EXPERIMENT.Hoping to receive your acknowledgement for the reception of this letter and then indue time also your final decision on the acceptance/rejection of my papers.Sincerely yours,Stefan MarinovEditorial note. This letter is answered by Dr. Kaluzny with a letter of the 6 June 1990