The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

- 203i:^.^. ? ;.surements also on other days, but I give the observation for the 22 January 1989, ason the different days (because of the difference between solar and sideral times) thehours of the day when observing maximum effects are different.b) How large are the error limits of the reported experiment? - The error limits canbe not precisely enough settled. I observed maximum opening of leaves (when the axis ofthe apparatus pointed "north-south") for about 1.5 hours. Thus, the reported right ascensionsare to be taken with an incertitude of about ± ^5^.Finally the referee writes that from a theoretical point of view a lot of questionsare open. The referee can find the answers to ALL his questions by reading my books.My CLASSICAL PHYSICS is an encyclopaedic book and in my series THE THORNY WAY OF TRUTHall experiments which contradict conventional electromagnetism, the theory of relativityand the laws of conservation of energy and angular momentum, known at the present time,are analysed.At the end of my comments I should like to point to the recent AMAZING fact. In theDecember-1989 issue of the AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS the well-known relativist Prof.Wolfgang Riridler asserts that for the case of a magnet moving with velocity v and generatingat a reference point the magnetic potential A, the induced electric intensity isnotE = - vxrotA, (1)_as conventional electromagnetism assert, butE = (v.grad)A, (2)as I assert .The question now is FOR WHICH of the above two formulas will the referee vote. Ifhe will vote for formula (1) he will enter into contradiction with Prof. Rindler andthe results of the rotational and inertial Kennard experiments. If he will vote forformula (2), he destroys all arguments raised by him against my submitted paper.Thus if the referee will not dare to vote for one of the formulas (1) or (2), my paperis to be given to a second, then to a third referee, and if none of them will dare tovote for one of these formulas, my paper is to be published. If at indecisive answersof THREE referees my paper will be rejected, one can say only one: "Jdete do prdele!"Marinov's note . The above letter and comments remained unanswered, cim mohli bychomprispet k vysledku, ze redaktor a recenzent sami se rozhodli zahajitodhod do prdele.