The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

:- 300SKTAM nV^lCINOV^ , «,,^,->-,,««^ Georgia Inst, of TechnologyTel. 0316/377093AtlantaGE 30332-0430„ .^ Ref. MS 900612Dear David,Thank you for your letters of the 1 July 1990, although the rejection of my papers1. Repetition of Whitehead's Experiment for Demonstrating...2. Maxwell's Illusion: the Displacement Current.was, of course, not pleasant for me.In my letter of submission of the 11 June 1990, expecting an eventual rejection, IwroteIn the case that you will reject my paper (and I am almost sure that you willreject it), I beg you to answer the following question:WILL, ACCORDING TO YOUR CONCEPTS, THE DIELECTRIC RING IN FIG. 4 OF THE FIRST PAPERROTATE WHEN ALTERNATING CURRENT WILL BE SENT IN THE APPARATUS OR NOT? I shall notaccept the rejection of the paper if this question will be not answered by YOU.You have not answered this question. I beg you ONCE MORE to answer it. I am so insisting,because you SURELY will give an answer which will be in contradiction withthe experimental evidence. In such a case you must consent that my paper MUST BE PUB-LISHED and you have (as well as conventional physics) to change your electromagneticconcepts.Enclosed is the paper which Dr. Maddox wrote recently in NATURE on another "puzzle"for conventional physics (although there is nothing puzzling if one will throw overboard the wrong theory of relativity and one will embrace my absolute space-time theory).Enclosed is also my comments to Dr. Maddox' paper which is submitted to NATURE butwhich SURELY will be rejected by Dr. Maddox. I should like to add that for the publicationof this paper of Dr. Maddox I visited him five times in London, I spoke with himno less than 1000 (THOUSAND) times on the phone and I exchanged hundred letters, telefaxesand telegrams. Please, have the understanding that I cannot expend the same effortswith every editor of a physical journal.I send you also my paper ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE NEWTON-LORENTZ EQUATIONS which willappear in PHYSICS ESSAYS, so that you can solve Dr. Maddox' "puzzle" by the relevantmathematical apparatus.I beg you VERY MUCH, do not give me the advice to send the papers rejected by youto PHYSICS ESSAYS. This journal cannot publish all my papers.You rejected my two papers by the motivation: "Author misses the physical contentof Maxwell's equations."There is only ONE WAY to show who understands these equations better: the predictionof experimental effects. Only this scientist understands well the Maxwell equationswho rightly predicts the issues of experiments. Thus, be so good and give the answerto my above mentioned question. Then, as a home-work, solve Dr. Maddox' "puzzle".I know that now in Atlanta it is wery hot and you would prefer to go to the swinmingpool. But, dear David, the questions are SO SIMPLE, SO SIMPLE. Think about in the pool!Hoping toreceive your answer soon.Sincerely yours,/" //ffffU 9^0^THE NEGLECTION OF EXPERIMENTS HAS NEVER cJ