12.07.2015 Views

The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

i:rv.;-^^;;;•those- 123 -mirror reflection and that the electric field nodes are locked tothe mirror surface . <strong>The</strong> translational motion <strong>of</strong> the Mlchelson-Morley apparatus through space could therefore be forcing theenergy in the standing wave oscillations to share the motion <strong>of</strong> theapparatus. If- the wave energy is 'forced' to share that motion,how can we be so sure that the wave velocity is not equallyconstrained to be referenced on that energy field and so on theapparatus that shares the motion <strong>of</strong> the earthly observer? If thephenomenon owes its existence to relativistic principles, thenprinciples must in some <strong>way</strong> arise from the ' forced' behaviour<strong>of</strong> the standing wave system. Does relativity involve us in thedifferences between standing waves and free waves and how does the'observer' relate to standing waves nodes that lock themselves ontonirror surfaces?This theme then leads us to ask what happens if a free wavecomponent having no reflected counterpart is superimposed upon astanding wave system having the same frequency. Will the free wavetravel at a speed referenced on some other frame, perhaps apreferred frame? This, <strong>of</strong> course, is easily tested because thefree wave would then modulate the standing wave along its length asa linear function <strong>of</strong> motion <strong>of</strong> the apparatus relative to thatpreferred frame.-.;'>• -^"w--.;.; .,'If we can contend that the standing wave energy, being forced toshare the motion <strong>of</strong> the mirror and so <strong>of</strong> the apparatus, entrains,as it were, the effective electromagnetic reference frame so far asthat standing wave system is concerned, are we to Imagine that adifferent electromagnetic reference frame can operate in the samevacuum region? If so, then what role do we assign to the notionalobserver in Einstein's theory?<strong>The</strong> essential point which emerges from the context <strong>of</strong> the abovequestions is that what we know as Lorentz invariance has come fromobservations on free particles with data derived from measurementsin which field energy is entrained by the apparatus. A physical

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!