The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

2252. The referee knows (I presume) that the electric potential of a sphere charged homoeneously(in its volume or on its surface) with electric charges does not depend on theadius of the sphere (at any point of space outside the sphere). I showed in my paperhat the force acting on a topsyturvy U-form Ampere bridge does not depend on the radiusf curvature. It is thus CLEAR that the magnetic pushing force acting on a U-form Ampereridge will NOT depend on the thickness of the wire and it is CLEAR that the force on ALL-form Ampere bridges will be the same as that one calculated for an infinitely thin wire.In13.our world there are NOT "pulling" forces. When one goes through a door on whicht is written "pull", one PUSHES the door by one's hand in a direction OPPOSITE to one'slovement. But the force acting on the Ampere bridge is NEITHER a pushing force, as thempere bridge is a SELFPROPULSING object set in motion by INTERNAL FORCES, in a drasticiolation of Newton's third law and of all concepts of humanity about the forces accordingwhich alv/ays a body A acts on a body B. The Ampere bridge is a body A which ACTS ONTSELF.4. The edge forces are the forces acting on the wire elements with lengths ao at bothdges (corners) on the shoulder of the Il-form bridge. For a n-form bridge of an infinitelyhin wire the forces acting on these small current elements are INFINITELY BIG. The refeeecan read how Pappas, J. APPL. PHYS. 59, 19 (1985) (Pappas is the FIRST person who hasone QUANTITATIVE measurements of the forces acting on the Ampere bridge) evades in hisALCULATIONS and MEASUREMENTS the availability of these "edge forces".5. In my paper I do NOT compare theoretically calculated forces acting on the Ampereridge with experimentally measured forces, as I show that even for the MOST SIMPLE U-formridge the calculation leads to an improper integral, and I was UNABLE to establish MA-HEMATICALLY whether the integral is converting to a final number or to infinity. Thust has no sense to cite the numbers of different authors obtained for different n-formmpere bridges. (LATER - see this volume, p. 14) I found that the integral converges to infinity!)I do not know the measurements of Roper but, surely, this Roper, if he really doesxist, has not made some valuable measurements, as nobody of the scientists treatinghe "Ampere-bridge problems" in the last years makes reference to Roper. I shall be, howver,infinitely thankful to the referee if he will supply me with reference to Roper'sxperiments. Cleveland has done only QUALITATIVE but not QUANTITATIVE measurements ofhe forces acting on the Ampere bridge. Graneau, NUOVO CIMENTO D7, 31 (1986) and Peoglos,PHYS. D 21, 1055 (1988) obtain quasi the same number as Pappasf = 10"^ N/A^.All these authors search for different tricks to resolve in their experiments the probemwith the "edge forces".In my experiments (S. Marinov, THE THORNY WAY OF TRUTH, East-West, Graz, 1988 and 1989,art III, p. 74 and Part IV, p. 140) where the contact between the bridge and the wireshich are solid to the laboratory is realized by BALL BEARINGS, I foundf = (5 ± 2.5)xlO"^ N/A^.However I was UNABLE to calculate the force even on the MOST SIMPLE tupsytorvy U-formridge, as my mathematical abilities are LIMITED. Meanwhile a GOOD mathematician MUST BEIBLE to establish whether the first integral on the right side of formula (9) in my papers convergent to infinity or to a certain final number. The referee of PHYSICS LETTERSurely must be a GOOD mathematician and I do not doubt that he will be able to calculatehe integrals (9). I shall be infinitely thankful to him if he will do this. As the calcuationswill take some time, I shall gladly pay lim % 200 for the work. The money can beREPAID to the Editor of PHYSICS LETTERS in the case that the referee will promise to do;he job. (I repeat, LATER - see item 5 above - I found that the integral converges to infinity. )6. The "stick model" has absolutely no reference to the calculation of the force actingin a U-form Ampere bridge. The "stick model" is applied when there are conductors withINITE cross-sections. My conductors are with INFINITELY SMALL cross-sections. For morenformation, see A. Ludwig, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Newsletter, p. 40, Fe->ruary 1989, where there are many other references treating the above topics.