The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

- 246 -SIEIAN MARINOV Prof. J. p. WesleyMorellcnfeldgasse 16 Weiherdammstr. 24; A-SOIO GRAZ - AUSTRIA D-7712 Blumberg12 May 1990^ ,^py^ p^^,^ p^ , p^pp,^Dear Paul,Thank you very much for your letter of the 9 May. As it contains certain details whwill be of no interest for the readers of TWT, I shall cite in my present answer onlythis part of your letter which will be of interest for those readers.In yourletter of the 12 April you blamed me that "I am rejecting experimental resulwhich do not happen to agree with my ideas". In my letter of the 30 April I wrote: '\ sbe very thankful to you if in your answer you will notice such experiments." In yourletter of the 9 May you wrote:You ignore the force on Ampere's bridge! Since the Biot-Savart lawgives mathematically any answer what-so-ever; your decision to choosethe Ampere result does not mean the Biot-Savart law predicts the forceon Anpere's bridge; it does not and cannot . If you really were not toignore the Ampere bridge experiment, then you would be forced to acceptthe empirical law of Ampere. I know of no other law that gives theright answer. You ignore the forces on Pappas' Z- shaped antenna! Eitheryou are ignoring the experiments or you are incapable of handling themath involved. Perhaps both?Here are my comments.Until now the force on the n-form Ampere bridge was calculated NEITHER proceeding fGrassmann's formula, NOR proceeding from Ampere's formula, as both formulas lead to sirlarities which can be not went around. Instead of a n-form bridge I analysed a U-formbridge (a topsy-turvy U), hoping that there will be no singularities and taking intoaccount that the forces on a n-form and U-form bridges must be equal (indeed, if theywould be not equal, then, making the one end of a rectangular loop to have a U-form, oiwill be able to set this loop in motion by internal forces). As I showed (see TWT-VII,p. 165), also for a U-form bridge, Grassmann's formula leads to singularities. This wa*3 very strange result. Now Prof. Bartocci of the Penlgia Institute of Mathematics hascalculated the improper integral (9) on p. 167 of TWT-VII and showed that it convergesto infinity. The calculation will be presented in TWT-VII I and we have to conclude thathfere is no way to calculate the pushing force on a U-form Ampere bridge made of an innitely thin wire.It is, indeed, very strange fact that the pushing force on a U-form bridge comes outto be infinitely big according to Grassmann's formula, as there are NO GEOMETRICAL sin