12.07.2015 Views

The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 242 - MarinovADDENDUMSee the paper "Propulsive and..published in TWT-IV, p. 136.<strong>The</strong> anonymous referee <strong>of</strong> the above paper who is supporter <strong>of</strong> Ampere's formula for thInteraction <strong>of</strong> two current elements and who considers Grassmann's formula (1) as wrong ,presented the following objection:<strong>The</strong> Ampere law easily explains the various motoring actions shown in this paper.<strong>The</strong> propulsion forces are reaction forces between parts <strong>of</strong> the circuit which canmove relative to each other. Consider figure 1. When ABC and FGH are stationaryand sliding contacts are provided at C and F, the bridge will move in the f^-direction, but the f^- forces are not acting on DE. <strong>The</strong>y are longitudinal forces in CDand FE produced by repulsion across the corners from BC and CF.<strong>The</strong> same longitudinal forces also explain the rotation <strong>of</strong> the motor when BC andGF are metal disks with sliding contacts to CD and FE.<strong>The</strong> Ampere force predicts that Marinov's motor will not rotate if C and F arewelded conductor junctions and AB and GH are made very long compared to DE. <strong>The</strong>current from a battery or other source would then have to be introduced with slidingcontacts at A and H. Also the battery leads would have to be kept well a<strong>way</strong>from the motor. If the motor still rotates with these modifications, then I acceptMarinov has proved his point <strong>of</strong> selfpropulsion.I agree that Ampere's formula predicts for my rotating Ampere bridge a torque in thesame direction as predicted by Grassmann's formula.However the referee is not right when asserting that if the wire BCDEFG in fig. 1 issolid with sliding contacts at the points B and G and with a rotational degree <strong>of</strong> freedomabout the axis ABGH, then according to Grassmann's formula a rotational moment(torque) should exist (according to Ampere's formula, <strong>of</strong> course, the torque in such acase must be null ).Now I shall show that also according to Grassmann's formula the rotational momentmust benull.Indeed, if assuming BC = CD = DF = EF = FG = a and if transferring the origin <strong>of</strong> thereference frame from point D to point B, the moment <strong>of</strong> the forces f-. which will drivethe bridge clockwise about the axis ABGH, will be given by the following formula (seeformula (6))Pi, .2R(-2)x/df3y = (u^I^/27i)R/(dx/x)x. (18)^0^0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!