The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

I211The derivation of the Lorentz force equation from the law of energy conservationis not correct, because magnetic field does not contribute to the change of kineticenergy of the moving charge.In the enclosed paper "Violation of the laws..." I give MATHEMATICALLY CORRECT deduclonof the Newton-Lorentz equation when proceeding from the definition equalities ofectric and magnetic energies (the laws of Coulomb and Neumann) and the energy conservalonlaw. I beg the referee to show WHERE my deduction is not correct. If he will beiable to find some mathematical error (and he surely will not find), he has to acceptlat the Newton-Lorentz equation can be deduced on the basis of the energy conservationiw (by the way, ALL equations in contemporary physics are deduced on the basis OF THIS(IGMATICAL LAW!). The referee is right that the magnetic intensity B does not contribute) a change in the kinetic energy of a test particle, but the magnetic energy W DOES.6) The referee writes:In conventional theory, the Lorentz force equation and the Maxwell equations aremutually independent and cannot by derived one from another. This is due to thefact that, while Maxwell equations describe the electromagnetic field itself andits generation by the moving charges, the Lorentz equation describes force exertedon the charge from the side of the field. Therefore it is very dubious toattempt to derive Maxwell equations from the Lorentz force equation as it is donein the paper.The truth, however is the following: The fundamental equation in electromagnetism (thequation of motion) is the Newton-Lorentz equation. The fundamental "field" quantitiesn electromagnetism are the potentials $, A, and not the intensities E, B. The intensiiesare MATHEMATICAL PRODUCTS of the potentials being defined as followsE = - grad$ - (l/c)8A/8t, B = rotA. (1)If the QUANTITIES E and B are defined in this way as functions of the PHYSICAL QUANTIT-IES $ and A, they must be BY FORCE connected by the mathematical relations calledaxwell equations. The referee can see how one can obtain the Maxwell equations fromhe above definitions equalities on pp. 44 and 45 of the enclosed paper "Maxwell's illuion:the displacement current". In the rejected paper I showed that besides the definiionequalities (1), one has to take also the MATHEMATICAL RELATIONS following from theEFINITION EQUALITIES for the potentials $, A and for the charge and current densitiesand J. For stationary systems this relations areA4) = - 47tQ, AA = - (4-rT/c)J (2)nd for dynamic systems they are^$ = - 4ttQ, -QA = - (4-ft/c)J. (3)For stationary systems the Maxwell equations have the formrotE^^ = - (l/c)8B/9t, divB = (4)rotB = 9E/c9t + (4tt/c)J divE = 47tQ (5)nd E,.. in equ. (4) is DIFFERENT from E = E , in equ. (5). Only for radiation fieldshese two electric intensities coincide.