The thorny way of truth - Free Energy Community

[ needftf'**!^One must especially EMPHASIZE that the pushing force on the Ampere bridge does not defendon its form, on its size and on the thickness and the chemical^ substance of thevire, so that all authors (as Pappas etc.) who search for finding experimentally suchdependencies are simply losing their time. I should like to note that here one comes toJ highly strange PARADOX: It is obvious that the force on a n-form bridge depends)n the length of the shoulder (for a longer shcilder the force must be bigger). On the)ther hand the force on two U-form bridges with radius of curvature respectively equal:o the half shoulders of two n-form bridges is the same. Hence if taking two rectangularloops ending on the one side with U-forms, then for the case that the net force on theone bridge is zero, on the other will be different from zero. Which is the solution of:his paradox? - The fact that ideal n-form bridges can be not realized. Thus if you will:ake one U-form bridge and if you divide it at the top point incerting there somestraight wire of an arbitrary length, making thus the bridge much wider, then I am;ure that the pushing forces on these two bridges (which can be easily calculated in:he form of improper integrals) will be THE SAME. I have not done these calculations, asmy time for more important things and AS I AM SURE that the forces will be equal.[f you can show by calculation that the pushing forces on these two bridges will beDIFFERENT, you will receive from me 100 DM.Let us now come to the other experiment: Pappas' Z-shaped antenna. You cannot blamene that I ignore that experiment, as I was the editor who published Pappas' report (inrWT-IV, p. 158) and you, surely, have learned abouth this experiment from my publication.It SEEMS that the null result of Pappas' experiment with the Z-shaped antenna rejects^rassmann's formula which predicts an effect. However, has Pappas taken into accountALL forces which act on his antenna? - No. He has IGNORED the CURRENT JET forces. As faris I know, I am the only author in the world who has introduced the current jet forcesinto physics. Until now I do not know about an EXPERIMENTAL confirmation of these for-:es (when the current streams in metal wires). I have proposed (see TWT-II, p. 98) a)retty simple experiment for separating these forces from the "Grassmann's" forcesi.e., from the magnetic forces between current elements) and for measuring the pushing'orce of the current jet forces, but until now NOBODY has carried out this experiment."his experiment (if done with precision) will give us a reliable number for the energy/elocity of the current conducting electrons, which I FIRMLY expect to be of the order)f c. Thus at the present moment the current jet forces of the current conducting elec-:rons streaming in a wire are HYPOTHETICAL, however when the electrons leave the wireind continue to stream in vacuum, they manifest their current jet forces, as this has)een many times experimentally established.In the Z-shape antenna of Pappas (see the first figure 5 on p. 167 of TWTtIV), onlythe Grassmann forces are indicated which, as a matter of fact, MUST set the antenna innotation. However, the current jet forces are not indicated. A rotating moment about theixis of rotation, besides of the current jet forces at the angles, will be generated by;he current jet forces of the electrons streaming to the end points of the antenna andTom the end points of the antenna. The reaction forces of these electrons when they areitopped and then accelerated in the opposite direction generate a rotational momentXACTLY OPPOSITE to the "Grassmann" moment. The law of angular momentum conservation willequire that the moments of rotation of these two kinds of forces must be equal and oppoiitelydirected. You might object that, according to me, this law can be violated and;hat I have experimentally demonstrated such violations. Yes, but in the majority of ca-;gs the law is preserved. Pappas experiment shows that here the law is preserved.Now I shall reveal to you a certain detail of Pappas' experiment which Pappas has notommunicated to the reader but only to me. When the experiment was done first, Pappas HAS)bserved a clear and definite rotation in the same direction as predicted by Grassmann'sormula. He noticed, however, that there was a stream of electrons out of the antenna's?nds (there was a slight noise). Pappas covered the ends by scotch, the noise disappearedind the rotating moment, too. This aspect of Pappas experiment (which is WELL KNOWN) shows:hat the current jet forces are enough big. We need further detailed and precise experilentsfor separating the current jet forces from the magnetic forces and only then we:an make a verdict on Pappas Z-shaped antenna. I will be happy to hear your comments and:o print them (along with another your interesting paper) in TWT-VIII which will appear;omewhere in July.Yours*ditorial note. Answered on the 15 May 1990. '/IIH