Annual Report 2010 - Ministry of Finance and Planning
Annual Report 2010 - Ministry of Finance and Planning
Annual Report 2010 - Ministry of Finance and Planning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3 | REFORM INITIATIVES• Category IIDevelopment Project Proposalsto be undertaken by PrivateInvestors in the form <strong>of</strong> PrivatePublic Partnership (PPP), BuildOwn Operate (BOO), BuildOwn Transfer (BOT) <strong>and</strong> otherpartnership arrangementswith line ministries or otherGovernment agencies.• Category IIIPrivate investment initiativeswhich involve having to disposeeither by sale, grant or otherwise -any state l<strong>and</strong> or l<strong>and</strong> owned by astate entity.The process relating to Category I<strong>and</strong> II requires the Secretary tothe line <strong>Ministry</strong> or the Head <strong>of</strong>the relevant Government Agencywho receives an unsolicited or ast<strong>and</strong>alone proposal to consider <strong>and</strong>be satisfied that such a proposalis likely to bring about exceptionalbenefits to the country, both interms <strong>of</strong> funding <strong>and</strong> otherwise <strong>and</strong>consequently proceeding with sucha unsolicited proposal without goingthrough the normal procurementprocess, if advantageous. He must besatisfied that the proposal <strong>and</strong> thefunding <strong>of</strong>fer appears important <strong>and</strong>relevant in the overall context <strong>of</strong> thepublic investment plan <strong>and</strong> the policystrategies <strong>of</strong> the Government or thatthe proposed investor comm<strong>and</strong>sa reputation <strong>and</strong> knowhow, that isotherwise scarcely available. In thecase <strong>of</strong> a proposal that containsmerit to proceed, it should besubmitted to the St<strong>and</strong>ing CabinetAppointed Review Committee(SCARC) for an assessment. TheSCARC upon receiving such aproposal for consideration, with theassistance <strong>of</strong> supporting committeeswhere necessary should evaluate <strong>and</strong>recommend whether such a proposalshould be proceeded with or not. Asstipulated in the relevant Guidelines,in deciding whether a deviation fromthe st<strong>and</strong>ard tender procedure isjustifiable, consideration should begiven to the strategic nature <strong>of</strong> theproject <strong>and</strong> the ultimate benefitsit is likely to bring to the economicdevelopment <strong>of</strong> the country,whether the proposal is within theplanned development agenda <strong>of</strong> thegovernment, the likely transformation<strong>of</strong> the knowledge, knowhow that islikely to flow from such project, theproposed conditions being attractive<strong>and</strong> acceptable <strong>and</strong> advantageousin the national interest. If deemedsuitable accordingly, such a proposalshould be recommended for theapproval <strong>of</strong> the Cabinet <strong>of</strong> Ministersto be proceeded with. However,in order to ensure transparency<strong>and</strong> accountability, the guidelinesrequire that related project financingshould necessarily be extendedthrough a reputed banking orfinancial institution acceptable tothe government <strong>and</strong> that the projectfinancing terms should extend to atleast up to 15 years including a graceperiod <strong>of</strong> at least 3 years. Further,the line agency is also required tomake an assessment <strong>and</strong> informwhether related repayments arepossible out <strong>of</strong> funds generated fromthe project or other funds withinthe control <strong>of</strong> such agency. It is arequirement that a ‘no objection’should be obtained from theCentral Bank regarding the externalfinancing terms.The process relating to CategoryIII deals with situations where theproposal involves inter alia thedisposition <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> either owned bya state or a state owned institution.In relation to such a proposal, if theSecretary to the line <strong>Ministry</strong> or theHead <strong>of</strong> the relevant governmentagency having made an assessmentis satisfied that such a proposal islikely to bring substantial, social oreconomic benefits to the countryor will facilitate to change thel<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>of</strong> the country, he couldsubmit such a proposal to theSCARC for consideration. If theSCARC is <strong>of</strong> the view that such aproposal deserves to be proceededwith, it can be proceeded inter aliawith Cabinet approval subject toregulatory clearances required. Toensure accountability, the relevantSecretary to the line <strong>Ministry</strong> or theHead <strong>of</strong> the relevant GovernmentAgency is required to obtain avaluation from the GovernmentChief Valuer based on which thetransaction should be concluded. Itis also a requirement that Secretaryto the line <strong>Ministry</strong> or the Head <strong>of</strong>the relevant Government Agencycredits any proceeds received fromsuch transactions to the Account<strong>of</strong> the Deputy Secretary to theTreasury, where in-turn such fundscan be utilized only for specificcapital investments within therelated agency as approved by theNational Budget Department.What is important to note is thatalthough with the approval <strong>of</strong> theCabinet <strong>of</strong> Ministers, steps can betaken to proceed with a st<strong>and</strong>-aloneor unsolicited proposal withouthaving to go through the GeneralTender Guidelines to select a party,the post award <strong>and</strong> complianceprocess has to be followed in terms<strong>of</strong> the procedure applicable tothe Government <strong>and</strong> governmentrelated institutions. In this regard,Public <strong>Finance</strong> Circular No. 444 wasissued on 04th August <strong>2010</strong>, havingobtained necessary approvals fromthe Cabinet <strong>of</strong> Ministers.190