13.07.2015 Views

Annual Report 2010 - Ministry of Finance and Planning

Annual Report 2010 - Ministry of Finance and Planning

Annual Report 2010 - Ministry of Finance and Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 | DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVESEconomic Policy in Briefkasri lanka the emerging wonder <strong>of</strong> asia – mahinda Chintana Vision for the futuresri lankathe emerging wonder <strong>of</strong> asiamahinda ChintanaVision for the futurethe DeVeLoPMent PoLiCY frAMeWorKGoVernMent <strong>of</strong> sri LAnKAdePartment <strong>of</strong> national <strong>Planning</strong>ministrY <strong>of</strong> finanCe <strong>and</strong> <strong>Planning</strong>The Development Policy Framework<strong>of</strong> the Government –“Sri Lanka Emerging Wonder <strong>of</strong>Asia: Mahinda Chintana – Vision for theFuture” – presents the country’s economicpolicy strategies, actions <strong>and</strong>the roadmap for the next six years.This policy framework which hasbeen developed based on the keyprinciples in the “Mahinda Chintana –Towards a New Sri Lanka, 2005” <strong>and</strong>the “Mahinda Chintana - Vision for theFuture <strong>2010</strong>,” was tabled in Parliamentalong with the 2011 Budget inNovember <strong>2010</strong>. The principle target <strong>of</strong>the strategy is to double the per capitaincome from USD 2,399 in <strong>2010</strong> inexcess <strong>of</strong> USD 4,000 in 2016 in orderto position Sri Lanka as a strong middleincome country. The main economictargets that have been set in the policyframework are shown in Table 1.1 alongwith recent trends.The economic development philosophy<strong>of</strong> Mahinda Chintana is that economicgrowth alone would not bringprosperity to the society but social,cultural, religious <strong>and</strong> environmentaldevelopment are equally important.It blends social justice <strong>and</strong> economicviability as opposed to policies followedprior to 2005 which were either biasedtowards economic viability at a cost <strong>of</strong>social justice, or social justice at a cost<strong>of</strong> economic viability.Table 1.1 > Main Socio Economic TargetsTarget Unit 2005 <strong>2010</strong> (Est) <strong>2010</strong> Actual 2016 (Proj)GDP USD bn 24.4 49.1 56.0 98.0Per Capita Income USD 1,241 2,375 2,399 4,470Inflation - GDP Deflator % 5.7 7.0 7.3 4.0Exports USD bn 6.3 8.0 8.3 18.0International Trade Turnover USD bn 15.2 21.3 22.8 44.1International Service Income USD bn 0.3 0.6 0.7 2.6Earnings from Tourism USD bn 0.3 0.5 0.5 2.5Remittances USD bn 2.0 3.8 4.1 7.0Access to Electricity % 75 88 88 100Access to Telecommunication % 23.6 85 100.8 100Women in Labour Force % 32.6 34.3 31.2 40Unemployment % 7.2 5.3 4.9 3.2Infant Mortality Per 1,000 11.2 10.9 8.5 4.0Maternal Mortality Per 1,000 0.45 0.39 0.33 0.2Poverty Headcount % 15.2 7.6 7.6 4.2Primary School Enrolment % 95.0 98.0 99 100Literacy Rate (15-24 years) % 95.0 97.0 97 98.0Literacy Rate -Computer % 9.7 20.3 20.3 75.0Source: <strong>Ministry</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Finance</strong> & <strong>Planning</strong>22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!