An Engine for Change - A Chronicle of the Engineering Council
An Engine for Change - A Chronicle of the Engineering Council
An Engine for Change - A Chronicle of the Engineering Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1999-2001: THE HAWLEY YEARS 171proposal that <strong>the</strong> panel would initially be elected from <strong>the</strong> members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EngC Senate whohad been elected by <strong>the</strong> Registrants (i.e. <strong>the</strong>y were not to be Institution nominees); <strong>the</strong> Groupasked what had become <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “new, leaner organisation” if <strong>the</strong>re were to be a carry-over <strong>of</strong>staff, premises and projects. The letter alleged that <strong>the</strong> Institutions were being marginalizedand concluded “For all that is done to spin this outcome to <strong>the</strong> media, Registrants andSenators, <strong>Engine</strong>ering <strong>Council</strong> staff and business, you won’t solve <strong>the</strong> problems …. unlessInstitutions are accepted as <strong>the</strong> voice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir members ”.However, <strong>the</strong>se reservations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Institutions did not appear (at least at that stage) to affectsignificantly <strong>the</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> deliberations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Shadow Board. Acting on <strong>the</strong> advice <strong>of</strong>its six working groups a report was posted on <strong>the</strong> web-site in August (revised slightly on 24September 2001) and headed: ‘The Organisation and Structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Engine</strong>ering andTechnology Board’. It proposed that <strong>the</strong> ETB Board should, through its actions,“conspicuously add value to <strong>the</strong> wider engineering community and to <strong>the</strong> community’s rolein improving <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> life and creating wealth”. Within <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ETB wouldbe a ‘New Regulatory Body’ (NRB) which would carry out broadly <strong>the</strong> regulatory andregistration functions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EngC, including representing <strong>the</strong> UK overseas on engineeringqualification issues.The Role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ETBIt was proposed that <strong>the</strong> ETB would be a company limited by guarantee and would havecharitable status. The Board, <strong>of</strong> some 15 members, would include representatives wi<strong>the</strong>xperience <strong>of</strong>:• The education sector• Business and industry in <strong>the</strong> wider engineering and technology community• Pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>Engine</strong>ering Institutions and associated bodies• Industrial and business training• Financial management• High level communication skillsIt would include <strong>the</strong> Chairman <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NRB and <strong>the</strong> Chairmen <strong>of</strong> any Panels established toassist <strong>the</strong> attainment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary objectives which were:1 – Start <strong>the</strong> reversal in <strong>the</strong> downward trend in <strong>the</strong> supply <strong>of</strong> people with qualifications andskills relevant to engineering and technology based careers and jobs.2 – Achieve a marked and noticeable shift in public attitudes towards an understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>importance and value <strong>of</strong> engineering and technology in today’s economy.3 – Build effective and valued links with business and industry reflecting its real time andfuture needs.4 – Review and maintain <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional standards required to meet industry’s needs andmaintain an authoritative register <strong>of</strong> appropriately qualified individuals.A number <strong>of</strong> panels, each <strong>of</strong> up to twelve members, plus a Chairman, was proposed inrelation to <strong>the</strong>se objectives. The panels were named as:• Life-long Development• Communications• Business and Industry© <strong>Engine</strong>ering <strong>Council</strong> UK 2004