13.07.2015 Views

An Engine for Change - A Chronicle of the Engineering Council

An Engine for Change - A Chronicle of the Engineering Council

An Engine for Change - A Chronicle of the Engineering Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1999-2001: THE HAWLEY YEARS 171proposal that <strong>the</strong> panel would initially be elected from <strong>the</strong> members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EngC Senate whohad been elected by <strong>the</strong> Registrants (i.e. <strong>the</strong>y were not to be Institution nominees); <strong>the</strong> Groupasked what had become <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “new, leaner organisation” if <strong>the</strong>re were to be a carry-over <strong>of</strong>staff, premises and projects. The letter alleged that <strong>the</strong> Institutions were being marginalizedand concluded “For all that is done to spin this outcome to <strong>the</strong> media, Registrants andSenators, <strong>Engine</strong>ering <strong>Council</strong> staff and business, you won’t solve <strong>the</strong> problems …. unlessInstitutions are accepted as <strong>the</strong> voice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir members ”.However, <strong>the</strong>se reservations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Institutions did not appear (at least at that stage) to affectsignificantly <strong>the</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> deliberations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Shadow Board. Acting on <strong>the</strong> advice <strong>of</strong>its six working groups a report was posted on <strong>the</strong> web-site in August (revised slightly on 24September 2001) and headed: ‘The Organisation and Structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Engine</strong>ering andTechnology Board’. It proposed that <strong>the</strong> ETB Board should, through its actions,“conspicuously add value to <strong>the</strong> wider engineering community and to <strong>the</strong> community’s rolein improving <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> life and creating wealth”. Within <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ETB wouldbe a ‘New Regulatory Body’ (NRB) which would carry out broadly <strong>the</strong> regulatory andregistration functions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EngC, including representing <strong>the</strong> UK overseas on engineeringqualification issues.The Role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ETBIt was proposed that <strong>the</strong> ETB would be a company limited by guarantee and would havecharitable status. The Board, <strong>of</strong> some 15 members, would include representatives wi<strong>the</strong>xperience <strong>of</strong>:• The education sector• Business and industry in <strong>the</strong> wider engineering and technology community• Pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>Engine</strong>ering Institutions and associated bodies• Industrial and business training• Financial management• High level communication skillsIt would include <strong>the</strong> Chairman <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NRB and <strong>the</strong> Chairmen <strong>of</strong> any Panels established toassist <strong>the</strong> attainment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary objectives which were:1 – Start <strong>the</strong> reversal in <strong>the</strong> downward trend in <strong>the</strong> supply <strong>of</strong> people with qualifications andskills relevant to engineering and technology based careers and jobs.2 – Achieve a marked and noticeable shift in public attitudes towards an understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>importance and value <strong>of</strong> engineering and technology in today’s economy.3 – Build effective and valued links with business and industry reflecting its real time andfuture needs.4 – Review and maintain <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional standards required to meet industry’s needs andmaintain an authoritative register <strong>of</strong> appropriately qualified individuals.A number <strong>of</strong> panels, each <strong>of</strong> up to twelve members, plus a Chairman, was proposed inrelation to <strong>the</strong>se objectives. The panels were named as:• Life-long Development• Communications• Business and Industry© <strong>Engine</strong>ering <strong>Council</strong> UK 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!