13.07.2015 Views

An Engine for Change - A Chronicle of the Engineering Council

An Engine for Change - A Chronicle of the Engineering Council

An Engine for Change - A Chronicle of the Engineering Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

74A CHRONICLE OF THE ENGINEERING COUNCILBy <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1990, pilot CPD schemes were involving over 1,000 engineers and techniciansin 65 organisations. A policy statement regarding a national scheme was issued early in 1991and <strong>the</strong> DES, through its PICKUP programme, provided £280,000 over three years fromJanuary to promote a national scheme.Interfacing InternationallyWhen Sir William Barlow took over <strong>the</strong> Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EngC, <strong>the</strong> single European Act<strong>of</strong> 1992 was on <strong>the</strong> horizon, albeit four years away. Within <strong>the</strong> EngC’s <strong>Engine</strong>eringPr<strong>of</strong>ession Directorate at this time Peter Hector, a Chartered Aeronautical <strong>Engine</strong>er from <strong>the</strong>RAF had taken over as International Executive following <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> Arthur Osley. A greatdeal <strong>of</strong> work was necessary now on international matters. With this in mind, ‘The Pr<strong>of</strong>essionAfter 1992’ was chosen as <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Second <strong>Engine</strong>ering Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Forum on 6December 1988, when Presidents and Secretaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nominated Bodies met EngC<strong>Council</strong> members. As a result a joint ‘1992 Working Party’ was set up. Already, by <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong>1988, believing that it would be helpful in preparing <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Act, 1,330 Britons hadapplied <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> title <strong>of</strong> European <strong>Engine</strong>er – as many as from all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> remaining nineteeneligible European countries put toge<strong>the</strong>r. Part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reason <strong>for</strong> this disparity was that o<strong>the</strong>rcountries did not have a central qualifying engineering organization that was prepared topublicise among engineers <strong>the</strong> Eur Ing concept.The constitution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> British National Committee <strong>for</strong> International <strong>Engine</strong>ering Affairs(BNCIEA) was amended in 1989 to permit Incorporated <strong>Engine</strong>ers to be adequatelyrepresented. As we explained in Chapter 2, BNCIEA operated under <strong>the</strong> aegis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Board<strong>for</strong> <strong>Engine</strong>ers’ Registration (BER); it represented <strong>the</strong> <strong>Engine</strong>ering Institutions, <strong>the</strong> Fellowship<strong>of</strong> <strong>Engine</strong>ering and <strong>the</strong> EngC, and was <strong>the</strong> UK’s national member <strong>of</strong> FEANI. The <strong>An</strong>nualAssembly <strong>of</strong> FEANI in August 1989 was hosted by <strong>the</strong> BNCIEA at Harrogate in conjunctionwith <strong>the</strong> International Conference on <strong>Engine</strong>ering Design. Edward (Ted) Houghton, aBNCIEA member, was elected Vice-President and Treasurer <strong>of</strong> FEANI <strong>for</strong> three years fromthat August. BNCIEA members representing <strong>the</strong> UK attended <strong>the</strong> 1989 World Federation <strong>of</strong><strong>Engine</strong>ering Organisations’ (WFEO) biennial conference in Prague and <strong>the</strong> Commonwealth<strong>Engine</strong>ers’ Conference in Nicosia, Cyprus, and members briefed some Institutions,educational establishments and industrial companies on <strong>the</strong> Single Market Act, 1992.Following a 1985 proposal by Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Levy acting as Secretary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> BNCIEA, agreementon <strong>the</strong> mutual recognition <strong>of</strong> accredited engineering degrees was achieved by <strong>the</strong> EngC inDecember 1989 with <strong>the</strong> relevant accreditation bodies <strong>of</strong> UK, Ireland, USA, Canada,Australia and New Zealand. This agreement came to be known as <strong>the</strong> ‘Washington Accord’following a preliminary signing in Washington DC. The <strong>for</strong>mal signing took place a yearlater during <strong>the</strong> WFEO meeting in Prague. Over <strong>the</strong> years, as we shall see, <strong>the</strong> WashingtonAccord assumed increasing international importance.The essence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Washington Accord was that each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> participating countries agreed torecognise <strong>the</strong> accreditation systems <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs as robust and <strong>of</strong> an equivalent standard. Thismeant, <strong>for</strong> example, that in <strong>the</strong> UK <strong>the</strong> engineering Institutions would automatically accept agraduate from an accredited engineering course <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries as satisfying <strong>the</strong>Stage 1 (Educational) requirements <strong>for</strong> registration as CEng.The agreement needed ratification by each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> partners and each had its own internalproblems. For example, in <strong>the</strong> UK all <strong>the</strong> Nominated Bodies had to be satisfied. In <strong>the</strong> USA© <strong>Engine</strong>ering <strong>Council</strong> UK 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!