13.07.2015 Views

An Engine for Change - A Chronicle of the Engineering Council

An Engine for Change - A Chronicle of the Engineering Council

An Engine for Change - A Chronicle of the Engineering Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1988-1990: THE BARLOW YEARS 77Affiliates. The EngC Chairman confirmed <strong>the</strong>se in a follow-up letter, encouraging eachAffiliate to participate.By <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1989, 277 Industry Affiliates [an increase <strong>of</strong> 67 mostly small and medium sizedcompanies over <strong>the</strong> 1988 figure] had been recruited following a joint approach to tradeassociation members. BEAMA [already mentioned], <strong>the</strong> Electronic <strong>Engine</strong>ering Association,<strong>the</strong> Federation <strong>of</strong> Civil <strong>Engine</strong>ering Contractors and <strong>the</strong> Association <strong>of</strong> Consulting <strong>Engine</strong>ersin particular, had been contacted.The sixth <strong>An</strong>nual Industry Forum was held in November 1990, attended by over 100 seniorrepresentatives from <strong>the</strong> EngC Industry Affiliates. The main items discussed were <strong>the</strong>proposed national system <strong>for</strong> CPD and <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>mation <strong>of</strong> an <strong>Engine</strong>ering Occupations’Standards’ Group (EOSG) – see below. In <strong>the</strong> same month a ‘Working Toge<strong>the</strong>r (Industry-Education Initiative)’ was published, supporting <strong>the</strong> campaign begun early in 1990. By <strong>the</strong>end <strong>of</strong> 1990 <strong>the</strong>re were 247 Industry Affiliates – a reduction <strong>of</strong> 30 companies compared with<strong>the</strong> 1989 numbers, brought about mainly by company mergers and <strong>the</strong> economic climate.O<strong>the</strong>r Industrial ActivitiesA network <strong>of</strong> Training and Enterprise <strong>Council</strong>s (TECs) was set up by Government in 1989 toenable local companies to help create relevant local skills bases. Because CEng, IEng andEngTech qualifications were competence based, <strong>the</strong> EngC’s framework was most attractiveto <strong>the</strong> TECs; it provided a measure <strong>of</strong> existing skills within a company, a means to identifyand quantify any additional skills needed, and a yardstick against which new courses could bemeasured. The EngC, however, needed to explain how industry could benefit by <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong>EngC titles. Sir William Barlow wrote to <strong>the</strong> emerging TECs explaining <strong>the</strong> EngC’s positionin setting and maintaining standards <strong>of</strong> training <strong>for</strong> engineers and technicians and <strong>of</strong>feredsupport to meet <strong>the</strong> TECs’ objectives.The plan <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Engine</strong>ering Occupations’ Standards’ Group (EOSG), discussed at <strong>the</strong> 1990Industry Affiliates’ Conference, was <strong>for</strong> a national coordination <strong>of</strong> standards across allengineering disciplines to secure a uni<strong>for</strong>mity <strong>of</strong> approach and use <strong>of</strong> nomenclature. It waslater realised that this would also be <strong>of</strong> benefit in allocating engineers consistently toparticular sections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EngC Register. In <strong>the</strong> event <strong>the</strong> EngC and <strong>the</strong> EmploymentDepartment, both seeking to avoid <strong>the</strong> emergence <strong>of</strong> diverse standards, aided <strong>the</strong> setting up <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> EOSG. However, it was a complicated scenario as most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>mer statutory IndustryTraining Organisations, such as <strong>the</strong> <strong>Engine</strong>ering Industry Training Board (EITB), had beendisbanded by Government legislation. [Although <strong>the</strong> <strong>Engine</strong>ering Training Authority - ETA -later emerged from <strong>the</strong> ashes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> old EITB.] The coordination task was, <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e,enormous as some 70 bodies associated with engineering were involved. The GovernmentWhite Paper ‘Employment <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s’ had, never<strong>the</strong>less, encouraged <strong>the</strong> EngC to take aninterest in competence-based per<strong>for</strong>mance standards and <strong>the</strong> EOSG <strong>of</strong>fered a suitableopportunity <strong>for</strong> progress. The Construction Industry Standing Conference was used as amodel to <strong>for</strong>m similar broad groups across engineering.Interfacing with <strong>the</strong> PublicThe Public Affairs staff, led by Ron Kirby in publicising <strong>the</strong> EngC’s aims and objectivesduring 1989, briefed Members <strong>of</strong> Parliament regularly, and achieved a 19% increase inreferences to <strong>the</strong> EngC in <strong>the</strong> national media and a 57% increase in provincial press coverage.© <strong>Engine</strong>ering <strong>Council</strong> UK 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!