05.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

were evaluated throughout the experiment. Nicotine exposure (6 mg nicotine/kg/day) during adolescence was related to<br />

increased, subsequent fentanyl self-administration in non-stressed male rats. Exposure to immobilization stress prior to opioid<br />

availability attenuated or reversed the effect of adolescent exposure to 6 mg nicotine/kg/day on fentanyl self-administration<br />

in adult male rats. These effects did not occur for female rats. Female rats consumed more fentanyl than did male rats,<br />

regardless of nicotine pre-exposure, but male <strong>and</strong> female rats did not display differences in withdrawal following naloxone<br />

challenge. Opiate self-administration decreased food consumption for all animals. Nicotine history appeared to increase<br />

plasma corticosterone levels in non-stressed, male <strong>and</strong> female rats. Nicotine decreased body weight gains <strong>and</strong> food<br />

Consumption among male <strong>and</strong> female rats <strong>and</strong> both of these effects were greater in female than in male rats. Nicotine cessation<br />

resulted in increases in body weight <strong>and</strong> food consumption <strong>and</strong> these effects were greater in females than in males. Stress<br />

increased plasma corticosterone in male <strong>and</strong> female rats <strong>and</strong> female rats had higher levels of plasma corticosterone. Stress<br />

decreased body weight <strong>and</strong> food consumption in male <strong>and</strong> female rats regardless of nicotine history.<br />

DTIC<br />

Adults; Hypotheses; Nicotine; Pharmacology; Rats; Sex<br />

20060001901 RAND Corp., Santa Monica, CA USA<br />

The Acquisition of Drugs <strong>and</strong> Biologics for Chemical <strong>and</strong> Biological Warfare Defense. Department of Defense<br />

Interactions with the Food <strong>and</strong> Drug Administration<br />

Rettig, Richard A.; Brower, Jennifer; Yaniv, Orlie; Jan. 1, 2003; 94 pp.; In English<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): DASW01-01-C-0004<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A440504; No Copyright; Avail.: Defense <strong>Technical</strong> Information Center (DTIC)<br />

Chemical <strong>and</strong> biological threats confront U.S. military personnel today both overseas <strong>and</strong> in the continental USA, whether<br />

in defensive, peacekeeping, or offensive situations. Defenses against such threats are both medical <strong>and</strong> nonmedical. Drugs <strong>and</strong><br />

biologics, mainly vaccines, constitute the primary medical defenses. Consequently, efforts of the U.S. Department of Defense<br />

(DoD) to protect American troops require the acquisition of drugs <strong>and</strong> biologics for chemical <strong>and</strong> biological warfare (CBW)<br />

defense. The objective of this acquisition, as is the case for other acquisitions, is to obtain the desired supply of a given product<br />

at an acceptable price. This study includes both drugs <strong>and</strong> biologics, but it emphasizes the latter (mainly focusing on vaccines,<br />

a subset of biologics). Vaccines provide advanced protection against biological warfare threats via immunization of at-risk<br />

troops <strong>and</strong> prior protection is a high priority within DoD. In contrast, drugs are useful mainly in treating already-exposed<br />

troops. Vaccine development is also more complicated than drug development because it typically involves manipulating live<br />

organisms, whereas drugs consist of more-stable chemical entities. DoD has two distinct roles during the acquisition of drugs<br />

<strong>and</strong> biologics for CBW defense: purchaser <strong>and</strong> developer. As purchaser of a drug approved by the U.S. Food <strong>and</strong> Drug<br />

Administration (FDA) for which a commercial market exists, DoD simply buys what it needs at the market price; DoD<br />

acquisition of influenza vaccine is a good example of this.<br />

DTIC<br />

Acquisition; Chemical Warfare; Defense Program; Drugs; Public Health; Warfare<br />

20060001912 RAND Corp., Santa Monica, CA USA<br />

RAND Review: Volume 29, Number 2, Summer 2005<br />

Jan. 1, 2005; 32 pp.; In English; Original contains color illustrations<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A440532; No Copyright; Avail.: Defense <strong>Technical</strong> Information Center (DTIC)<br />

RAND Review is published periodically by the RAND Corporation, a nonprofit institution. The mission of the RAND<br />

Corporation is to help improve policy <strong>and</strong> decision making through research <strong>and</strong> analysis. Titles of articles appearing in this<br />

publication include: 1) Army Stretched Thin: There’s no easy way out for the nation; 2) Centerpiece -- No Single Policy is<br />

Likely to Meet All Army Goals, Given Current Rate of Sustained Operations; 3) Cover Story -- Peace Entrenched: Planning<br />

for a Palestinian State should not await a final settlement; 4) Doctor’s Orders: Better electronic prescribing systems could<br />

improve care.<br />

DTIC<br />

Decision Making; Policies; Summer<br />

20060001923 Inotek Pharmaceuticals Corp., Benerly, MA USA<br />

Testing of WW-85<br />

Salzman, Andrew; Nov. 21, 2005; 20 pp.; In English<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): W911NF-05-1-0016<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A440590; INOTEK-46981; ARO-46981.1-LS-DRP; No Copyright; Avail.: CASI: A03, Hardcopy<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!