05.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a 35 percent decline in its external spending during the past decade. It has been able to maintain its level of space system<br />

expenditures during this period, but many other areas have suffered.<br />

DTIC<br />

<strong>Aerospace</strong> Industry; Cost Analysis; Government Procurement; Procurement<br />

13<br />

ASTRODYNAMICS<br />

Includes powered <strong>and</strong> free flight trajectories; orbital <strong>and</strong> launching dynamics.<br />

20060000021<br />

Fitting the Fully Coupled ORM for the Fermilab Booster<br />

Huang, X.; Lee, S. Y.; Prebys, E.; January 2004; 8 pp.; In English<br />

Report No.(s): DE2005-15017120; FERMILAB-CONF-05-115; No Copyright; Avail.: Department of Energy Information<br />

Bridge<br />

The orbit response matrix (ORM) method (1) is applied to model the Fermilab Booster with parameters such as the BPM<br />

gains <strong>and</strong> rolls, <strong>and</strong> parameters in the lattice model, including the gradient errors <strong>and</strong> magnet rolls. We found that the gradients<br />

<strong>and</strong> rolls of the adjacent combined-function magnets were deeply correlated, preventing full determination of the model<br />

parameters. Suitable constraints of the parameters were introduced to guarantee an unique, equivalent solution. Simulations<br />

show that such solution preserves proper combinations of the adjacent parameters. The result shows that the gradient errors<br />

of combined-function magnets are within design limits.<br />

NTIS<br />

Fitting; Matrix Methods; Independent Variables; Booster Rocket Engines<br />

15<br />

LAUNCH VEHICLES AND LAUNCH OPERATIONS<br />

Includes all classes of launch vehicles, launch/space vehicle systems, <strong>and</strong> boosters; <strong>and</strong> launch operations. For related information see<br />

also 18 Spacecraft Design, Testing <strong>and</strong> Performance; <strong>and</strong> 20 Spacecraft Propulsion <strong>and</strong> Power.<br />

20060001781 Air Force Inst. of Tech., Wright-Patterson AFB, OH USA<br />

Investigation of the Performance Characteristics of Re-Entry Vehicles<br />

Bilbey, Charles A.; Sep. 1, 2005; 85 pp.; In English; Original contains color illustrations<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A440191; AFIT/GSS/ENY/05-S01; No Copyright; Avail.: Defense <strong>Technical</strong> Information Center (DTIC)<br />

When a non-US spacecraft reenters the Earth’s atmosphere, having the ability to accurately determine its performance<br />

characteristics is a primary concern. This study investigated the atmospheric re-entry profiles of a maneuverable re-entry<br />

vehicle. The re-entry vehicle was modeled as a point mass with aerodynamic properties. Equations of motion were numerically<br />

integrated, giving the time histories of position, velocity <strong>and</strong> flight path angle. The algorithm is able to generate a complete<br />

<strong>and</strong> feasible entry trajectory of a approximately 25-minute flight time in about 5 to 10 seconds on a desktop computer, given<br />

the entry conditions <strong>and</strong> values of constraint parameters. This preliminary study shows the feasibility of identifying <strong>and</strong> further<br />

exploring the technical challenges involved in using a mathemathical model to simulate the performance characteristics of the<br />

maneuvering re-entry vehicle.<br />

DTIC<br />

Maneuverable Reentry Bodies; Reentry Vehicles<br />

20060001809 Air Force Inst. of Tech., Wright-Patterson AFB, OH USA<br />

The Effect of Aerodynamic Surfaces Versus Thrust Maneuvers on Reentry Vehicles<br />

Albrecht, Meredith M.; Sep. 1, 2005; 85 pp.; In English; Original contains color illustrations<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A440289; AFIT/GAE/ENY/05-S01; No Copyright; Avail.: Defense <strong>Technical</strong> Information Center (DTIC)<br />

This research effort analyzes the effect of aerodynamic surfaces versus thrust maneuvers on a reentry vehicle. At high<br />

altitudes the effect of aerodynamic surfaces on the reentry vehicle is small due to low atmospheric density; however as the<br />

vehicle reaches lower altitudes a lift maneuver is very successful in deflecting the vehicle <strong>and</strong> creating a large impact footprint.<br />

When a continuous thrust maneuver is input in the place of a lift maneuver the results are very similar at the highest maneuver<br />

altitudes, although the impact footprint shrinks rapidly as the maneuver altitude decreases. Additionally, when the thrust<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!