NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports
NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports
NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
seedling effort, Metron has been awarded a NAVAIR Phase II SBIR contract to accelerate the transition of this distributed<br />
search technology.<br />
DTIC<br />
Detection; Drone Vehicles; Surveillance; Target Acquisition; Targets<br />
20060001903 RAND Corp., Santa Monica, CA USA<br />
Competition <strong>and</strong> Innovation in the U.S. Fixed-Wing Military Aircraft Industry<br />
Birkler, John; Bower, Anthony G.; Drezner, Jeffrey A.; Lee, Gordon; Lorell, Mark; Smith, Giles; Timson, Fred; Trimble,<br />
William P. G.; Younossi, Obaid; Jan. 1, 2003; 128 pp.; In English; Original contains color illustrations<br />
Report No.(s): AD-A440507; No Copyright; Avail.: Defense <strong>Technical</strong> Information Center (DTIC)<br />
In the first couple of decades following World War II, over a dozen firms competed vigorously to develop <strong>and</strong> produce<br />
U.S. military aircraft. During the ensuing years, some firms left the business <strong>and</strong> others merged, so that by 1990 only eight<br />
firms survived. In the following few years, the pace of consolidation quickened. Today, only three firms are capable of<br />
developing <strong>and</strong> producing major military aircraft systems. Policymakers have expressed concern that further consolidation<br />
could erode the competitive environment, which has been a fundamental driver of innovation in the military aircraft industry.<br />
DTIC<br />
Aircraft Configurations; Competition; Fixed Wings; Industries<br />
20060001922 Applied Research Associates, Inc., Tyndall AFB, FL USA<br />
Halon Flightline Extinguisher Evaluation: Data Supporting St<strong>and</strong>ard Development<br />
Dierdorf, Dougls S.; Kiel, Jennifer C.; Oct. 1, 2005; 19 pp.; In English<br />
Contract(s)/Grant(s): F08637-98-C-6002; Proj-4915<br />
Report No.(s): AD-A440586; AFRL-ML-TY-TR-2005-4583; No Copyright; Avail.: Defense <strong>Technical</strong> Information Center<br />
(DTIC)<br />
This evaluation of flightline fire extinguishers has been conducted to determine minimum performance criteria for<br />
assessing the capability of fire extinguishing agents to suppress two specific aircraft engine fires; three dimensional flowing<br />
fuel fires in the aircraft tail pipe <strong>and</strong> engine nacelle fires that can be fought through the access panel. This test series<br />
documented performance of 150 lb fire extinguishers containing Halon 1211 for extinguishing hidden <strong>and</strong> running fuel fires.<br />
An F-100 engine nacelle mockup was used to evaluate the full extinguishment times <strong>and</strong> amount of extinguishing agent used<br />
on a series of twenty aft engine <strong>and</strong> pool fires of 100-ft2 <strong>and</strong> ten access panel fires. The test series data was successfully used<br />
to develop a consistent, repeatable test procedure with pass/fail criteria for three dimensional <strong>and</strong> hidden fires through the rear<br />
engine <strong>and</strong> the access panel. The resulting document provides the performance st<strong>and</strong>ard for assessing alternative agents to<br />
determine suitability for use by USAF personnel in support of flightline fire extinguishers with the primary mission of rescue<br />
<strong>and</strong> fire suppression during aviation related incidents.<br />
DTIC<br />
Aircraft Engines; Fire Extinguishers; Fires; Halon<br />
20060002034 National War Coll., Washington, DC USA<br />
Maritime Patrol Aircraft - Operational Versatility from the Sea<br />
Hallowell, Paul E.; Jan. 1, 1994; 18 pp.; In English<br />
Report No.(s): AD-A440539; No Copyright; Avail.: CASI: A03, Hardcopy<br />
U.S. Force structure in the post-Cold War security environment continues to be a subject of constant debate. While the<br />
Bottom-Up Review (BUR) thoroughly examined future defense requirements, it actually raised more questions than it<br />
answered since the result of that process remains unaffordable. In the absence of a bonafide National Security Strategy, efforts<br />
to size <strong>and</strong> shape the military will undoubtedly continue to be a very difficult undertaking. And with budgetary constraints<br />
essentially driving force structure decisions, it becomes imperative that the military incorporate <strong>and</strong> retain cost-effective<br />
platforms that have utility across a wide range of warfare areas. One such platform is the P-3 Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA).<br />
Traditionally, with the aircraft carrier as the centerpiece of naval aviation, non-organic assets such as the P-3 have often been<br />
left behind when it comes to representation for programs <strong>and</strong> budget decisions in the Pentagon. Now that the Cold War is over,<br />
funding has become even more difficult for MPA, as pressure to reduce anti-submarine warfare assets in the absence of a<br />
Soviet submarine threat has translated into deep cuts for the P-3 community. In 1990, there were 24 active patrol squadrons;<br />
by 1996, there will be 12 -- the largest cut among all navy platforms. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the value of<br />
MPA across a wide range of warfare disciplines <strong>and</strong> to underscore the importance of preserving current force structure. The<br />
22