05.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

seedling effort, Metron has been awarded a NAVAIR Phase II SBIR contract to accelerate the transition of this distributed<br />

search technology.<br />

DTIC<br />

Detection; Drone Vehicles; Surveillance; Target Acquisition; Targets<br />

20060001903 RAND Corp., Santa Monica, CA USA<br />

Competition <strong>and</strong> Innovation in the U.S. Fixed-Wing Military Aircraft Industry<br />

Birkler, John; Bower, Anthony G.; Drezner, Jeffrey A.; Lee, Gordon; Lorell, Mark; Smith, Giles; Timson, Fred; Trimble,<br />

William P. G.; Younossi, Obaid; Jan. 1, 2003; 128 pp.; In English; Original contains color illustrations<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A440507; No Copyright; Avail.: Defense <strong>Technical</strong> Information Center (DTIC)<br />

In the first couple of decades following World War II, over a dozen firms competed vigorously to develop <strong>and</strong> produce<br />

U.S. military aircraft. During the ensuing years, some firms left the business <strong>and</strong> others merged, so that by 1990 only eight<br />

firms survived. In the following few years, the pace of consolidation quickened. Today, only three firms are capable of<br />

developing <strong>and</strong> producing major military aircraft systems. Policymakers have expressed concern that further consolidation<br />

could erode the competitive environment, which has been a fundamental driver of innovation in the military aircraft industry.<br />

DTIC<br />

Aircraft Configurations; Competition; Fixed Wings; Industries<br />

20060001922 Applied Research Associates, Inc., Tyndall AFB, FL USA<br />

Halon Flightline Extinguisher Evaluation: Data Supporting St<strong>and</strong>ard Development<br />

Dierdorf, Dougls S.; Kiel, Jennifer C.; Oct. 1, 2005; 19 pp.; In English<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): F08637-98-C-6002; Proj-4915<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A440586; AFRL-ML-TY-TR-2005-4583; No Copyright; Avail.: Defense <strong>Technical</strong> Information Center<br />

(DTIC)<br />

This evaluation of flightline fire extinguishers has been conducted to determine minimum performance criteria for<br />

assessing the capability of fire extinguishing agents to suppress two specific aircraft engine fires; three dimensional flowing<br />

fuel fires in the aircraft tail pipe <strong>and</strong> engine nacelle fires that can be fought through the access panel. This test series<br />

documented performance of 150 lb fire extinguishers containing Halon 1211 for extinguishing hidden <strong>and</strong> running fuel fires.<br />

An F-100 engine nacelle mockup was used to evaluate the full extinguishment times <strong>and</strong> amount of extinguishing agent used<br />

on a series of twenty aft engine <strong>and</strong> pool fires of 100-ft2 <strong>and</strong> ten access panel fires. The test series data was successfully used<br />

to develop a consistent, repeatable test procedure with pass/fail criteria for three dimensional <strong>and</strong> hidden fires through the rear<br />

engine <strong>and</strong> the access panel. The resulting document provides the performance st<strong>and</strong>ard for assessing alternative agents to<br />

determine suitability for use by USAF personnel in support of flightline fire extinguishers with the primary mission of rescue<br />

<strong>and</strong> fire suppression during aviation related incidents.<br />

DTIC<br />

Aircraft Engines; Fire Extinguishers; Fires; Halon<br />

20060002034 National War Coll., Washington, DC USA<br />

Maritime Patrol Aircraft - Operational Versatility from the Sea<br />

Hallowell, Paul E.; Jan. 1, 1994; 18 pp.; In English<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A440539; No Copyright; Avail.: CASI: A03, Hardcopy<br />

U.S. Force structure in the post-Cold War security environment continues to be a subject of constant debate. While the<br />

Bottom-Up Review (BUR) thoroughly examined future defense requirements, it actually raised more questions than it<br />

answered since the result of that process remains unaffordable. In the absence of a bonafide National Security Strategy, efforts<br />

to size <strong>and</strong> shape the military will undoubtedly continue to be a very difficult undertaking. And with budgetary constraints<br />

essentially driving force structure decisions, it becomes imperative that the military incorporate <strong>and</strong> retain cost-effective<br />

platforms that have utility across a wide range of warfare areas. One such platform is the P-3 Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA).<br />

Traditionally, with the aircraft carrier as the centerpiece of naval aviation, non-organic assets such as the P-3 have often been<br />

left behind when it comes to representation for programs <strong>and</strong> budget decisions in the Pentagon. Now that the Cold War is over,<br />

funding has become even more difficult for MPA, as pressure to reduce anti-submarine warfare assets in the absence of a<br />

Soviet submarine threat has translated into deep cuts for the P-3 community. In 1990, there were 24 active patrol squadrons;<br />

by 1996, there will be 12 -- the largest cut among all navy platforms. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the value of<br />

MPA across a wide range of warfare disciplines <strong>and</strong> to underscore the importance of preserving current force structure. The<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!