20.01.2016 Views

in Mississippi

m2078-county-gov-ms

m2078-county-gov-ms

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Notice<br />

After the petition is filed, notice must be provided <strong>in</strong> the same time and manner as is required for<br />

an <strong>in</strong>corporation. 49<br />

Hear<strong>in</strong>g<br />

At the hear<strong>in</strong>g all persons hav<strong>in</strong>g an objection may appear and present evidence. 50 The<br />

chancellor is to hear the case based on the issue of reasonableness. 51 If the chancellor f<strong>in</strong>ds the<br />

annexation reasonable, a decree is to be entered grant<strong>in</strong>g the annexation. As <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>corporation<br />

cases, if the burden of proof is not met, the annexation should be denied. The chancellor has the<br />

option of grant<strong>in</strong>g the annexation <strong>in</strong> part. No territory not described <strong>in</strong> the ord<strong>in</strong>ance may be<br />

added by the chancellor. The decree of the chancellor is effective ten (10) days after entry if no<br />

appeal is taken. 52<br />

Reasonableness<br />

In a series of cases aris<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce the adoption of the current annexation statutes <strong>in</strong> 1950 the<br />

<strong>Mississippi</strong> Supreme Court has dealt with the issue of what is a reasonable annexation. The<br />

Court has repeatedly summarized the factors as follows:<br />

• the municipality's need for expansion;<br />

• whether the area sought to be annexed is reasonably with<strong>in</strong> a path of growth of the<br />

city;<br />

• the potential health hazards from sewage and waste disposal <strong>in</strong> the annexed areas;<br />

• the municipality's f<strong>in</strong>ancial ability to make the improvements and furnish municipal<br />

services promised;<br />

• the need for zon<strong>in</strong>g and overall plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the area;<br />

• the need for municipal services <strong>in</strong> the area sought to be annexed;<br />

• whether there are natural barriers between the city and the proposed annexation area;<br />

• the past performance and time element <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the city's provision of services to<br />

its present residents;<br />

• the impact (economic or otherwise) of the annexation upon those who live <strong>in</strong> or own<br />

property <strong>in</strong> the area proposed for annexation;<br />

• the impact of the annexation upon the vot<strong>in</strong>g strength of protected m<strong>in</strong>ority groups;<br />

• whether the property owners and other <strong>in</strong>habitants of the areas sought to be annexed<br />

have <strong>in</strong> the past, and for the foreseeable future unless annexed will, because of their<br />

reasonable proximity to the corporate limits of the municipality, enjoy the (economic<br />

and social) benefits of proximity to the municipality without pay<strong>in</strong>g their fair share of<br />

the taxes; and<br />

• any other factors that may suggest reasonableness vel non. 53<br />

188

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!