27.04.2016 Views

Callister - An introduction - 8th edition

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10.3 The Kinetics of Phase Transformations • 351<br />

Liquid<br />

Solid<br />

<br />

Surface or interface<br />

SL<br />

SI<br />

IL<br />

Figure 10.5 Heterogeneous<br />

nucleation of a solid from a liquid.<br />

The solid–surface 1 SI 2, solid–liquid<br />

1 SL 2, and liquid–surface 1 IL 2,<br />

interfacial energies are<br />

represented by vectors. The<br />

wetting angle 1u2 is also shown.<br />

For heterogeneous<br />

nucleation of a solid<br />

particle, relationship<br />

among solid–surface,<br />

solid–liquid, and<br />

liquid–surface<br />

interfacial energies<br />

and the wetting angle<br />

For heterogeneous<br />

nucleation, critical<br />

radius of a stable<br />

solid particle nucleus<br />

For heterogeneous<br />

nucleation,<br />

activation free<br />

energy required for<br />

the formation of a<br />

stable nucleus<br />

occur at surfaces and interfaces than at other sites. Again, this type of nucleation is<br />

termed heterogeneous.<br />

In order to understand this phenomenon, let us consider the nucleation, on a<br />

flat surface, of a solid particle from a liquid phase. It is assumed that both the liquid<br />

and solid phases “wet” this flat surface, that is, both of these phases spread out<br />

and cover the surface; this configuration is depicted schematically in Figure 10.5.<br />

Also noted in the figure are three interfacial energies (represented as vectors) that<br />

exist at two-phase boundaries— SL , SI , and IL —as well as the wetting angle u (the<br />

angle between the SI and SL vectors). Taking a surface tension force balance in<br />

the plane of the flat surface leads to the following expression:<br />

IL SI SL cos u<br />

(10.12)<br />

Now, using a somewhat involved procedure similar to the one presented above<br />

for homogeneous nucleation (which we have chosen to omit), it is possible to derive<br />

equations for r* and G*; these are as follows:<br />

r* 2 SL<br />

¢G y<br />

¢G* a 16pg SL<br />

3 b S1u2<br />

3¢Gy<br />

2<br />

(10.13)<br />

(10.14)<br />

The S() term of this last equation is a function only of (i.e., the shape of the nucleus),<br />

which will have a numerical value between zero and unity. 1<br />

From Equation 10.13, it is important to note that the critical radius r* for heterogeneous<br />

nucleation is the same as for homogeneous, inasmuch as SL is the same surface<br />

energy as in Equation 10.3. It is also evident that the activation energy barrier<br />

for heterogeneous nucleation (Equation 10.14) is smaller than the homogeneous barrier<br />

(Equation 10.4) by an amount corresponding to the value of this S() function, or<br />

¢G het * ¢G hom * S1u2<br />

(10.15)<br />

Figure 10.6, a schematic graph of G versus nucleus radius, plots curves for both<br />

types of nucleation, and indicates the difference in the magnitudes of ¢G* het and<br />

¢G* hom , in addition to the constancy of r*. This lower ¢G* for heterogeneous means<br />

that a smaller energy must be overcome during the nucleation process (than for<br />

1<br />

For example, for angles of 30 and 90, values of S() are approximately 0.01 and 0.5,<br />

respectively.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!