27.04.2016 Views

Callister - An introduction - 8th edition

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

17.10 Oxidation • 705<br />

Table 17.3<br />

Pilling–Bedworth Ratios<br />

for a Number of Metals<br />

Protective<br />

Nonprotective<br />

Ce 1.16 K 0.45<br />

Al 1.28 Li 0.57<br />

Pb 1.40 Na 0.57<br />

Ni 1.52 Cd 1.21<br />

Be 1.59 Ag 1.59<br />

Pd 1.60 Ti 1.95<br />

Cu 1.68 Ta 2.33<br />

Fe 1.77 Sb 2.35<br />

Mn 1.79 Nb 2.61<br />

Co 1.99 U 3.05<br />

Cr 1.99 Mo 3.40<br />

Si 2.27 W 3.40<br />

Source: B. Chalmers, Physical Metallurgy.<br />

Copyright © 1959 by John Wiley & Sons,<br />

New York. Reprinted by permission of<br />

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.<br />

where A O is the molecular (or formula) weight of the oxide, A M is the atomic<br />

weight of the metal, and r O and r M are the oxide and metal densities, respectively.<br />

For metals having P–B ratios less than unity, the oxide film tends to be porous<br />

and unprotective because it is insufficient to fully cover the metal surface. If the<br />

ratio is greater than unity, compressive stresses result in the film as it forms. For<br />

a ratio greater than 2–3, the oxide coating may crack and flake off, continually<br />

exposing a fresh and unprotected metal surface. The ideal P–B ratio for the formation<br />

of a protective oxide film is unity. Table 17.3 presents P–B ratios for metals<br />

that form protective coatings and for those that do not. Note from these data<br />

that protective coatings normally form for metals having P–B ratios between 1<br />

and 2, whereas nonprotective ones usually result when this ratio is less than 1 or<br />

greater than about 2. In addition to the P–B ratio, other factors also influence the<br />

oxidation resistance imparted by the film; these include a high degree of adherence<br />

between film and metal, comparable coefficients of thermal expansion for<br />

metal and oxide, and, for the oxide, a relatively high melting point and good hightemperature<br />

plasticity.<br />

Several techniques are available for improving the oxidation resistance of a<br />

metal. One involves application of a protective surface coating of another material<br />

that adheres well to the metal and also is itself resistant to oxidation. In some instances,<br />

the addition of alloying elements will form a more adherent and protective<br />

oxide scale by virtue of producing a more favorable Pilling–Bedworth ratio and/or<br />

improving other scale characteristics.<br />

Kinetics<br />

One of the primary concerns relative to metal oxidation is the rate at which the reaction<br />

progresses. Inasmuch as the oxide scale reaction product normally remains<br />

on the surface, the rate of reaction may be determined by measuring the weight<br />

gain per unit area as a function of time.<br />

When the oxide that forms is nonporous and adheres to the metal surface, the<br />

rate of layer growth is controlled by ionic diffusion. A parabolic relationship exists

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!