27.04.2016 Views

Callister - An introduction - 8th edition

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

17.4 Prediction of Corrosion Rates • 683<br />

corrosion penetration<br />

rate (CPR)<br />

Corrosion<br />

penetration rate—<br />

as a function of<br />

specimen weight<br />

loss, density, area,<br />

and time of exposure<br />

Expression relating<br />

corrosion rate and<br />

current density<br />

although these potentials may be used to determine spontaneous reaction directions,<br />

they provide no information as to corrosion rates. That is, even though a V potential<br />

computed for a specific corrosion situation using Equation 17.20 is a relatively<br />

large positive number, the reaction may occur at only an insignificantly slow rate.<br />

From an engineering perspective, we are interested in predicting the rates at which<br />

systems corrode; this requires the use of other parameters, as discussed next.<br />

The corrosion rate, or the rate of material removal as a consequence of the<br />

chemical action, is an important corrosion parameter. This may be expressed as the<br />

corrosion penetration rate (CPR), or the thickness loss of material per unit of time.<br />

The formula for this calculation is<br />

CPR KW<br />

rAt<br />

(17.23)<br />

where W is the weight loss after exposure time t; and A represent the density and<br />

exposed specimen area, respectively, and K is a constant, its magnitude depending on<br />

the system of units used. The CPR is conveniently expressed in terms of either mils<br />

per year (mpy) or millimeters per year (mm/yr). In the first case, K 534 to give CPR<br />

in mpy (where 1 mil 0.001 in.), and W, , A, and t are specified in units of milligrams,<br />

grams per cubic centimeter, square inches, and hours, respectively. In the second case,<br />

K 87.6 for mm/yr, and units for the other parameters are the same as for mils per<br />

year, except that A is given in square centimeters. For most applications a corrosion<br />

penetration rate less than about 20 mpy (0.50 mm/yr) is acceptable.<br />

Inasmuch as there is an electric current associated with electrochemical corrosion<br />

reactions, we can also express corrosion rate in terms of this current, or, more<br />

specifically, current density—that is, the current per unit surface area of material<br />

corroding—which is designated i.The rate r, in units of mol/m # 2 s, is determined using<br />

the expression<br />

r <br />

i<br />

nf<br />

(17.24)<br />

where, again, n is the number of electrons associated with the ionization of each<br />

metal atom, and f is 96,500 C/mol.<br />

17.4 PREDICTION OF CORROSION RATES<br />

Polarization<br />

polarization<br />

Consider the standard Zn/H 2 electrochemical cell shown in Figure 17.5, which has<br />

been short-circuited such that oxidation of zinc and reduction of hydrogen will occur<br />

at their respective electrode surfaces. The potentials of the two electrodes will<br />

not be at the values determined from Table 17.1 because the system is now a nonequilibrium<br />

one. The displacement of each electrode potential from its equilibrium<br />

value is termed polarization, and the magnitude of this displacement is the overvoltage,<br />

normally represented by the symbol . Overvoltage is expressed in terms<br />

of plus or minus volts (or millivolts) relative to the equilibrium potential. For example,<br />

suppose that the zinc electrode in Figure 17.5 has a potential of 0.621 V<br />

after it has been connected to the platinum electrode. The equilibrium potential is<br />

0.763 V (Table 17.1), and, therefore,<br />

h 0.621 V 10.763 V2 0.142 V<br />

There are two types of polarization—activation and concentration. We will now<br />

discuss their mechanisms because they control the rate of electrochemical reactions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!