27.04.2016 Views

Callister - An introduction - 8th edition

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

490 • Chapter 12 / Structures and Properties of Ceramics<br />

40<br />

250<br />

Flexural strength (MPa)<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Flexural strength (10 3 psi)<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6<br />

Volume fraction porosity<br />

Figure 12.36 The influence of porosity on the flexural strength for aluminum oxide at<br />

room temperature. (From R. L. Coble and W. D. Kingery, “Effect of Porosity on Physical<br />

Properties of Sintered Alumina,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 39, 11, Nov. 1956, p. 382. Reprinted<br />

by permission of the American Ceramic Society.)<br />

Dependence of<br />

flexural strength on<br />

volume fraction<br />

porosity<br />

10 vol% porosity will often decrease the flexural strength by 50% from the measured<br />

value for the nonporous material. The degree of the influence of pore volume<br />

on flexural strength is demonstrated in Figure 12.36, again for aluminum oxide. Experimentally<br />

it has been shown that the flexural strength decreases exponentially<br />

with volume fraction porosity (P) as<br />

s fs s 0 exp 1nP2<br />

In this expression 0 and n are experimental constants.<br />

(12.10)<br />

Hardness<br />

Accurate hardness measurements are difficult to conduct inasmuch as ceramic materials<br />

are brittle and highly susceptible to cracking when indenters are forced into<br />

their surfaces; extensive crack formation leads to inaccurate readings. Spherical<br />

indenters (as with Rockwell and Brinell tests) are normally not used for ceramic<br />

materials because they produce severe cracking. Rather, hardnesses of this class of<br />

materials are measured using Vickers and Knoop techniques that employ indenters<br />

having pyramidal shapes (Section 6.10, Table 6.5). 3 Vickers is widely used for measuring<br />

hardnesses of ceramics; however, for very brittle ceramic materials, Knoop is<br />

often preferred. Furthermore, for both techniques, hardness decreases with increasing<br />

load (or indentation size), but ultimately reaches a constant hardness<br />

plateau that is independent of load; the value of hardness at this plateau varies from<br />

ceramic to ceramic. <strong>An</strong> ideal hardness test would be designed so as to use a sufficiently<br />

large load that lies near this plateau, yet of magnitude that does not introduce<br />

excessive cracking.<br />

3 ASTM Standard C1326, “Standard Test Method for Knoop Indentation Hardness of<br />

Advanced Ceramics,” and Standard C1327, “Standard Test Method for Vickers Indentation<br />

Hardness of Advanced Ceramics.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!