23.10.2016 Views

KVPT’s Patan Darbar Earthquake Response Campaign - Work to Date - September 2016

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Opposite<br />

Inven<strong>to</strong>ry of the surviving roof<br />

struts of South Manimaṇḍapa.<br />

Six struts remain which feature<br />

fragmented deities with lost forearms.<br />

The four corner struts with<br />

“corner horses” (Nev. kũsalaḥ) are<br />

complete.<br />

<strong>Patan</strong>, 11 April <strong>2016</strong><br />

304<br />

Roof Struts<br />

South Manimaṇḍapa’s roof was originally supported by<br />

twenty struts. Sixteen struts represented certain deities in<br />

distinct postures, holding their characterizing attributes<br />

in their two hands. Each forearm of the bipartite arms<br />

was connected <strong>to</strong> the figure’s upper arm with iron hinges.<br />

Already before 25 April 2015, some of these struts<br />

had been lost. The four corner struts which supported<br />

the Manimaṇḍapa’s heavy roof and spiritually protected<br />

it represent two pairs of female and male “corner horses”<br />

(Nev. kũsalaḥ) –– hybrid creatures in the form of horned<br />

and winged lions. Ten struts survive, among them the<br />

four corner struts. The cross-legged, garland-wearing<br />

deities in diaphanous garments on five of the struts have<br />

lost their forearms, including the attributes that were<br />

important parts of their iconography. Despite this fact,<br />

two can be identified as they are riding on their typical<br />

mounts: Mahālakshmi on a snake, and Unmatta Bhairava<br />

on a lion. The iconography of one strut, showing<br />

Hanuman, the central figure of the Hindu epic Ramayana,<br />

is different compared <strong>to</strong> the others. Furthermore,<br />

Hanuman is constructed in a different manner, which<br />

becomes evident if one studies his remaining upper arms<br />

that seemed <strong>to</strong> be of one single part (there remain no<br />

holes as the forearms are missing). The strut may have<br />

originally belonged <strong>to</strong> some other building and was possibly<br />

recycled at the South Manimaṇḍapa.<br />

The conservation of the struts will turn out <strong>to</strong> be a difficult<br />

issue: Which strut or deity is missing remains unclear<br />

due <strong>to</strong> the lack of pre-earthquake documentation.<br />

In this context, a replacement of the lost struts is impossible.<br />

At the same time, the lost forearms and attributes<br />

of the remaining deities cannot be reconstructed using<br />

3-dimensional models. This situation will likely be resolved<br />

with the installation of blank timber struts and<br />

fragmented carved struts,- in other words, a fragmented<br />

state of repair.<br />

Roof<br />

The roof will be reconstructed with new materials since<br />

there is nothing left that can be reused.<br />

Open Questions<br />

In the South Manimaṇḍapa, the rebuilding is taken as an<br />

opportunity <strong>to</strong> reconfigure the structure’s latest state of<br />

repair <strong>to</strong> return as closely <strong>to</strong> the his<strong>to</strong>ric design as possible,<br />

as there have been more recent changes <strong>to</strong> the building<br />

made in the course of renovations. However, it will<br />

be a matter of discussion <strong>to</strong> determine which his<strong>to</strong>ric design<br />

is the. There is only one his<strong>to</strong>ric pho<strong>to</strong>graph, taken<br />

by Clarence Comyn Taylor in 1863, that guides us. As<br />

discussed, this pho<strong>to</strong> does not show the original design,<br />

but a mandapa that was already altered. And a significant<br />

question must be addressed regarding the future shape of<br />

the surrounding wall of the stepwell.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!