23.10.2016 Views

KVPT’s Patan Darbar Earthquake Response Campaign - Work to Date - September 2016

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

at the interface between the slab and shear key. Inadequate<br />

detailing could drastically affect the lifespan and<br />

effectiveness of the structure in an earthquake.<br />

Superstructure<br />

Above grade, the main challenge at the South Mani<br />

Mandapa structure is how <strong>to</strong> connect the heavy brick<br />

masonry and timber structure above the ground level<br />

arcade back down <strong>to</strong> the foundations while maintaining<br />

as much his<strong>to</strong>ric fabric and architectural integrity<br />

as possible. The <strong>to</strong>p-heavy nature of the structures, the<br />

slender and delicate nature of the highly carved his<strong>to</strong>ric<br />

columns, the lack of tensile capacity in the connections<br />

and timber joinery, and a variety of other structural discontinuities<br />

and weaknesses make this connection vital<br />

<strong>to</strong> the success of the project. Adding <strong>to</strong> the structural<br />

complexity are the desire <strong>to</strong> retain the sound timber of<br />

the his<strong>to</strong>ric central core columns (mainly intact, with<br />

lowest 1-2 feet requiring replacement due <strong>to</strong> wet rot)<br />

and the discontinuities introduced by repairs at the perimeter<br />

columns.<br />

The outer columns of South Mani Mandapa have been<br />

repaired, with the exception of one replaced column,<br />

and these columns will be tied <strong>to</strong> the base s<strong>to</strong>nes beneath<br />

them via stainless steel dowels set in a structural epoxy.<br />

This will add tensile capacity <strong>to</strong> these connections so<br />

that the column tenons will not rock or pull out of their<br />

mortises as they did in 2015.<br />

Several design iterations were also developed and discussed<br />

for treating the 4 central columns as a core, as the<br />

discussion of whether <strong>to</strong> use a stiff core or a more flexible<br />

overall system progressed. The following concepts were<br />

just some of those considered, following on the concepts<br />

presented by structural engineer Evan Speer’s August<br />

2015 report.<br />

Option 1<br />

An initial concept was <strong>to</strong> simply replace the four central<br />

columns with new timber <strong>to</strong> provide continuous,<br />

stronger timber columns. These timber columns would<br />

bear on a steel base plate connection <strong>to</strong> the foundation<br />

system, be it a concrete slab or steel grillage. The columns<br />

would have doweled connections in<strong>to</strong> the foundations<br />

<strong>to</strong> tie the columns down <strong>to</strong> the foundations. This<br />

concept would provide a continuous column with no<br />

exposed steel, which preserves the original architectural<br />

feel. It introduces new, continuous wood providing a<br />

more robust load path than his<strong>to</strong>ric timber joined with<br />

new timber at the base, and can keep the his<strong>to</strong>ric layout<br />

of the timber column. This concept however, would require<br />

the removal of original, his<strong>to</strong>ric timber columns<br />

Manimandpa conceptual diagrams<br />

of a stiff central steel column core<br />

for South Manimandapa, developed<br />

in August 2015 by Evan<br />

Speer. This concept sought <strong>to</strong> bring<br />

the structure up <strong>to</strong> an operational<br />

performance level, but required<br />

replacing the central his<strong>to</strong>ric timber<br />

columns with steel. This started the<br />

discussion about choosing between<br />

a stiff core and a flexible system.<br />

Sketch by Evan Speer, 2015<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!