THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND THE QUESTION OF KAZAKHSTAN’S HISTORY

More documents

Recommendations

Info

130 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND dent Kazakh government… the efforts of Kenesarı movement brought Kazakh people together and he faced many difficult obstacles to overcome”. 229 According to Bekmakhanov, the “Kenesarı movement was the national struggle of Kazakh people who were ready to sacrifice their life to protect the independence. We see this Kenesarı uprising was a progressive character against the tsarist government. The evidence of this was the attempt to establish a central government to eliminate the enmity between the tribes” and showed the Kenesarı movement as realistic and fair. However, repression, exile, and the totalitarian system shattered Bekmakhanov’s will. Faced with severe and difficult problems, and sentenced to terrible penalties, Bekmakhanov had to rescind his thesis and opinions evident in the study and in 1957 he published another work called “ Kazakhstan Should Be Subject to Russia”. In this work, Bekmakhanov wrote that “by analyzing Kenesarı Khan’s domestic and foreign policy, we can conclude that his policy was against the public”. He further noted that “Also, … it was commented that social foundations of feudal-monarchist movement of Kenesarı was supported by supreme class of some of the reactionary feudal-Sultan”. 230 Bekmakhanov was compelled by the Soviet system to comply with its rigid ideological realities, with its terms and conditions. As a scientist who loved his people, but forced to succumb to pressure, Bekmakhanov evaluated fairly the people’s history and imprinted his name and people’s national values onto the national history. Although the ideology and politics of the Soviet Party wrongly understood the work of Kenesarı and Alash intellectuals, time and history has accurately recorded a fair and accurate assessment. Love and loyalty to his people, academic integrity to science, and not ignoring the real events, connected the Alash intellectuals and Bekmakhanov and created a bond between their ideas. His militant character raised people’s national spirit and the national interest and he did not waste any effort towards the goal of national independence. 229 Bekmakhanov E., Kazahstan XIX gasırdın 20-40 jıldarında. (Textbook), Almatı. Sanat Yay. 1994. p. 416. 230 Bekmakhanov E., Prisoyedineniye Kazahstana k Rossii, SSCB İlimler Akademisi Yay. Moskova, 1957. p. 343.
THE QUESTION OF KAZAKHSTAN’S HISTORY 131 BIBLIOGRAPHY Adebiyet jane İskusstvo, 1952.No5. Bekmakhanov E. Kazahstan XIX gasırdın 20-40 Jıldarında (Ders Kitabı), Almatı. Sanat Yay., 1994. Bekmakhanov E., Prisoyedineniye Kazahstana K Rossii, SSCB İlimler Akademisi Yay., Moskova, 1957. Bolşevik Kazakhstana, 1945. No 6. Dosmuhamedulı H. Alaman. Almatı, 1991. Dosmuhamedulı H., Taymanulı İsataydın Qozgalısı Tuvrasında Kıskaşa Maglumat, Tandamalı (İzbrannoye), Almatı, Ana Tili Yay., 1998. Gureviç L. Totalitarizm i İntelegentsia. Almaty, 1992. Han Kene (Kazak Halkının Tavelsizdiği Üşin Küresken Han-Batırlar Tuvralı Tarihi Tolgamdar men Pyesa, Dastandar), Almatı, 1993. İstoriya Kazahskoy SSR S Drevneyşih Vremen Do Naşih Dney, Editör. M. Abdıhalıkova ve A.Pankratova. A-A, KazOGİZ, 1943. Kazak Tarihi, 2006, No1. Kazakistan Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlık Arşivi, 141.fon 1.liste 1043 madde, 1b. KazUU Habarşısı, Tarih Serisi, 2004. No2 (25). Kemengerulı K., Kazak Tarihınan Karsı Kozgalıstar Tandamalı, Almaty, Kazakistan Yay., 1996. Leninşil Jas, 31 January. 1948. “Novıye dokumentı o soveşanii istorikov v ЦК ВКП (б) 1944”, Voprosı İstirii, 1991. No 1. Nurpeyisulu K., “Tarihi Şındıktan Attap Öte Almagan”, Egemen Kazakistan, 8 Nisan 1999. Nürpeyisov K. - Kulkenov M. - Habijanov B. - Mektepov A., Halel Dosmuhamedulı Jane Onın Ömiri men Şıgarmaşılıgı, Almatı. 1996. Pravda, 26 December 1950. Türkistan, 26 April.2004. Vestnik AN KazSSR, 1948, No 3. Voprosı İstorii, 1951, No 4. Voprosı İstorii, 1988, No 11.
Page 1 and 2:
THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND THE Q
Page 3 and 4:
Symposium Organization Committee: P
Page 5 and 6:
CONTENTS 11 ERMUKHAN BEKMAKHANOV AN
Page 7 and 8:
THE QUESTION OF KAZAKHSTAN’S HIST
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25:
Page 28 and 29:
28 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND of
Page 30 and 31:
30 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND co
Page 32 and 33:
32 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND Ru
Page 34 and 35:
34 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND de
Page 36 and 37:
36 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73:
Page 76 and 77:
76 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND co
Page 78 and 79:
78 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND of
Page 80 and 81: 80 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND se
Page 82 and 83: 82 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND in
Page 84 and 85: 84 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND de
Page 86 and 87: 86 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND pr
Page 88 and 89: 88 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND st
Page 90 and 91: 90 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND BI
Page 92 and 93: 92 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND Ma
Page 95 and 96: THE QUESTION OF KAZAKHSTAN’S HIST
Page 101: THE QUESTION OF KAZAKHSTAN’S HIST
Page 104 and 105: 104 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND b
Page 106 and 107: 106 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND i
Page 108 and 109: 108 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND B
Page 110 and 111: 110 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND R
Page 114 and 115: 114 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND p
Page 116 and 117: 116 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND l
Page 118 and 119: 118 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND A
Page 120 and 121: 120 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND f
Page 122 and 123: 122 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND B
Page 124 and 125: 124 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND s
Page 126 and 127: 126 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND o
Page 128 and 129: 128 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND J
Page 137: THE QUESTION OF KAZAKHSTAN’S HIST
Page 142 and 143: 142 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND
Page 144 and 145: 144 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND I
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189:
Page 192 and 193:
192 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND T
Page 194 and 195:
194 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND b
Page 196 and 197:
196 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND I
Page 198 and 199:
198 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND W
Page 200 and 201:
200 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND o
Page 202 and 203:
202 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND m
Page 204 and 205:
204 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND t
Page 206 and 207:
206 THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND B
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231:
show all

THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND THE QUESTION OF KAZAKHSTAN’S HISTORY

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?