19.12.2016 Views

THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND THE QUESTION OF KAZAKHSTAN’S HISTORY

SOVYET-TARIH-YAZICILIGI-ENG

SOVYET-TARIH-YAZICILIGI-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

152<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>SOVIET</strong> <strong>HISTORIOGRAPHY</strong> <strong>AND</strong><br />

rical facts are overlooked. Soviet propaganda is basing these events<br />

on these unfounded claims: Peoples of Turkestan united with Russia<br />

voluntarily. Even if happened some small riots there, they happened<br />

with incitation of feudal chieftains which didn’t want to lose their<br />

privileges. Local people always behaved friendly to Russian people.<br />

The formal history education felt the effects of Soviet thesis about<br />

Kazakhstan’s going under Russia control. In the book named “Teaching<br />

Kazakhs USSR History Materials for IV Classes” prepared to help history<br />

teachers in Kazakhstan, suggests to teacher how to easily explain that<br />

process of participation Kazakhstan to Russia was voluntarily this way:<br />

“It should be taken benefit from visual materials of meeting between<br />

Ebu’l Hayr Han and Russian envoy and the oath that they claim that<br />

happened to show that the process of participation Kazakhstan to<br />

Russia was voluntarily. Assuring that students are carefully looking<br />

at visual materials it should be shown that khan and persons around<br />

him took the oath by their consent and they were satisfied with it.” 256<br />

In the same guidebook to teachers are recommended these sentences<br />

to ensure that the participation to Russia was based on voluntarily<br />

basis: “Why and how did Kazakhstan participate to Russia? Teachers,<br />

with their own words, should talk about inside and outside attacks<br />

on Kazakhstan and should explain how Kazakhstan in these negative<br />

conditions needed help from other country. It should be pointed out<br />

that this country was Russia and the sentence of Ebu’l Hayr Khan given<br />

to Tsarina should be read to ensure this topic.” 257<br />

In history books for VII/VIII classes with titled “Kazakhstan’s Voluntarily<br />

Participation to Russia” annexation process is explained as<br />

follows: “At the begging of XVIII century Kazakhstan situation was in<br />

a very difficult because of damage that came from Dzungar’s attacks<br />

from East and Hive feudals’ attacks from West. The situation became<br />

even worse with the pressure that came from the Shah of Iran. In that<br />

situation the relationship between Kazakhs and Russian started to<br />

strengthen. And as a result of this relationship Kazakhs Hans asked<br />

annexation from Russia.” 258<br />

As a result the period of Russian occupation full of bloody collision<br />

and struggle for liberty was overlooked and these occupations were<br />

tried to explain as a Kazakhstan’s voluntarily annexation to Russia,<br />

which is based on letter that Ebu’l Hayr Han sent to Tsarina asking<br />

from her auspices. An important steps are taken for facilitating Soviet<br />

256 IV. Klas Kazak SSR Tarihy Materyaldarının Okutuv, ibid, p. 25.<br />

257 Ibid, p. 26<br />

258 VII/VIII. Klas Kazak SSR Tarihi, Almatı, 1970, p. 56.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!