19.12.2016 Views

THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND THE QUESTION OF KAZAKHSTAN’S HISTORY

SOVYET-TARIH-YAZICILIGI-ENG

SOVYET-TARIH-YAZICILIGI-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

162<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>SOVIET</strong> <strong>HISTORIOGRAPHY</strong> <strong>AND</strong><br />

until the end of the 1950s.<br />

Because 1960s were the years when the type of Soviet historian<br />

was fully formed, it is beneficial to take this issue broadly. The era<br />

of 1960s was the time when the Soviet historian was under the influence<br />

of Soviet ideology; he submitted himself to this ideology. The<br />

place for the open declaration of this submission was at the Public<br />

Agreement on Precautions for the improvement of preparing Scientific-Pedagogy<br />

Personnel for History organized in Moscow between 18<br />

and 21 December 1962. The meeting was attended by almost 2000<br />

historians, scientists, lecturers, and archivists from different regions<br />

of the Soviet Union. On December 18 and 19, a general session occurred<br />

in which the academic B. N. Ponamaryev—who attended the<br />

meeting as the representative of the State—gave a speech about “The<br />

duty of History as Science and the Preparation of Scientific-Pedagogy<br />

Personnel for History” that was discussed. On December 20-21 the<br />

issues of History of CPSU, History of USSR, and General History were<br />

discussed in three sessions. As the “translator”, President of USSR<br />

Sciences Academy, M. V. Keldış, narrated the duties that Ponamaryev,<br />

as the representative of state, placed on historians:<br />

“In the program of Communist Party of Soviet Union, social sciences<br />

and fine arts play the main role in the guidance to social development.<br />

In the establishment of communism, these examine socialism and its<br />

transmission to communism in political, economic and cultural levels,<br />

develop and strengthen the idea of communism in Soviet society.<br />

Science of history has a specific place in fulfilling these duties. It<br />

is important to learn the recent history of our country and to examine<br />

the successful history of Communist Party and Soviet society, and<br />

also Socialism, Communism and the labor movements in the world”. 275<br />

As a consequence of these efforts, Soviet historians crafted the<br />

“submission letter” below, on the last day of the meeting, and with<br />

the guidance of the CPSU:<br />

“To Central Committee of Communist Party of Soviet Union,<br />

We, the meeting contributors of Soviet Union historians, thank to<br />

Central Committee of Communist Party of Soviet Union under the leadership<br />

of Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev, on behalf of many important<br />

scholars for the development of science of history in our country. The<br />

CPSU Program and the decisions of XXII Party Congress gives the duty<br />

журнaлa Отечественнaя история С. В. Тютюкиным”, Отечественнaя история,<br />

Московa 2001. No. 5, pp. 128-130.<br />

275 КелдыШ, М. В., “Вступительное слово”, Все союзное совещaние о мерaх улучwения<br />

подготовки нaучно-педaгогических кaдров по историческим нaукaм,Москвa, 18-21<br />

дек. 1962г., Moscow, 1964. pp. 9.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!