19.12.2016 Views

THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND THE QUESTION OF KAZAKHSTAN’S HISTORY

SOVYET-TARIH-YAZICILIGI-ENG

SOVYET-TARIH-YAZICILIGI-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

168<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>SOVIET</strong> <strong>HISTORIOGRAPHY</strong> <strong>AND</strong><br />

shennosekretno), historians could acquire and use them. Otherwise,<br />

these confidential and very confidential documents could be used by<br />

special researchers, and only with permission, which could only be<br />

taken from special government institutions.<br />

Any quotes taken from the documents were ascribed to numbered pages<br />

and checked by special personnel at the archive. The quotes not related<br />

to the written subject information, were removed or lined through. 293<br />

Archives of the Soviet Union were centralized in Moscow and Leningrad,<br />

and this situation was a handicap for the historians who lived<br />

or worked in elsewhere. This problem was stated by scholars from<br />

time to time. The KGB archives were out of bounds during the Soviet<br />

Period, for anyone who wanted to search about the recent past. But it<br />

can be seen that during the last days of the Soviet Union, historians<br />

used those archives. 294<br />

It is necessary to mention the publication of documents that were<br />

available for historians to use during the Soviet period., which require<br />

substantial work and effort. To be more specific, it was seen as a<br />

substantial team-work<br />

The editorial work by scholars was not enough, it also required some<br />

party members too. This party member was assigned by the party ideology<br />

department, was not only responsible for reading and evaluating<br />

the comments of these scientists about the documents and works, but<br />

they also had the “power of intervention” to the content of the documents.<br />

Rearranging the document contents according to party ideology<br />

was an important consideration. Therefore, this practice should always<br />

be noted while evaluating the Soviet period documents and archives.. 295<br />

Thus, the Soviet historian had to utilize only the documents made<br />

available to him.<br />

5. Importance of the quotations that historians use or made<br />

The points to be considered during the writing process were:<br />

Quotations from Soviet leaders representing Soviet ideology at the<br />

beginning of the document. This meant especially quotes from Marx,<br />

293 Ağayev, ibid, p. 151.<br />

294 Some of the middle asian historions tod their complaints about this matter in Moscow<br />

like this: “Some of the documents about the Middle Asia are located in Moscow. This situation<br />

gives local historions a hard time.” See: Все союзное совещaние о мерaх улучwения<br />

подготовки нaучно-педaгогических кaдров по историческим нaукaм,Москвa, 18-21<br />

дек. 1962 г., Moscow, 1964. p. 241.<br />

295 The process of publishment of A.İ Gertsen’s Works is a right example to give about this<br />

subject. During this process lots of ideas and sentences took out of the work by party officers<br />

because they were not suitale to the party ideology. For detailed information look<br />

Tvardovskaya, p. 195-196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!