19.12.2016 Views

THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND THE QUESTION OF KAZAKHSTAN’S HISTORY

SOVYET-TARIH-YAZICILIGI-ENG

SOVYET-TARIH-YAZICILIGI-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>QUESTION</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>KAZAKHSTAN’S</strong> <strong>HISTORY</strong> 83<br />

Mukhamedzhan Seralin, the Kazak poet and the editor of the Kazak<br />

periodical Ai qap, published his collection of poems in 1903 (and<br />

re-published for several times in the following years) long before the<br />

Soviet regime. Seralin, in his poem “Top zhargan”, written in 1898, described<br />

Kenesary as a “dishonest dictator who allied himself with other<br />

biis and rich Kazaks merely to enrich themselves at the expense of<br />

the Kazak masses”. 126 In this context, Seralin’s depictions fit the Tsarist<br />

Russia’s discourse, and Kenesary was reflected as the one who used<br />

the masses in his personal interests rather than the public problems.<br />

Sanjar Aspendiyarov 127 , one of the first Kazak historians of the<br />

Soviet period, published his work Qazaqstan Tarihynyn Ocherkteri<br />

(Notes on the History of Kazakstan) in 1935. After describing for pages<br />

Kenesary and his movement in a negative way, at the very end, the<br />

author indicated that this revolt was one of the biggest mass uprisings<br />

by the Kazaks, emerged to get rid of the colonial yoke of the<br />

Tsarist Russia. In addition, Aspendiyarov stated that this period of the<br />

Kazak history should be evaluated as the first phase of the national<br />

liberation movement. 128 Probably the author had to criticize Kenesary<br />

and his revolt and describe as a negative figure and event due to the<br />

circumstances of his period. The oppression of the Kazak people by<br />

the brutal Tsarist regime and by the local feudal lords was appropriate<br />

according to the classical Marxist discourse in the Soviet Union.<br />

However, it is quite significant that Aspendiyarov assessed Kenesary<br />

revolt as the first phase of the national independence movement. A<br />

few years later, Aspendiyarov lost his life due to Stalinist repression<br />

and purges of the intelligentsia.<br />

Eltok Dilmukhamedov was one of the Kazak intellectuals, who<br />

wrote the thesis on Kenesary Kasymuly rebellion. Dilmukhamedov<br />

tersburg, 1904, IV-XXXIV; Potanin, Grigorii. “Biyograficheskie svedeniya o Chokane Valikhanove”<br />

(Biographical Data about Chokan Valikhanov), Valikhanov, Chokan. Sobraniye<br />

sochineniy v pyati tomah (Collection of Chokan Valikhanov’s Works in Five Volumes),<br />

Almaty, 1985, vol. 5, p. 365; Semiluzhinski (Yadrintsev), N. “Chokan Valikhanov i kul’turnye<br />

vzyaimosvyazi narodov” (Chokan Valikhanov and Cultural Interrelations of the Peoples),<br />

Valikhanov, Chokan. Sobraniye sochineniy v pyati tomah (Collection of Chokan Valikhanov’s<br />

Works in Five Volumes). Almaty, 1985, vol. 5, p. 286; Valikhanov, Chokan. “The Genealogy<br />

of the Kazak Khans and Sultans”, Sobraniye sochineniy v pyati tomah (Collection of<br />

Chokan Valikhanov’s Works in Five Volumes), Almaty, 1985, vol. 4, p. 491.<br />

126 Sabol, Steven, “Kazak Resistance to Russian Colonization: Interpreting the Kenesary<br />

Kasymov Revolt, 1837–1847”, Central Asian Survey (June/September, 2003) 22(2/3), pp.<br />

244-245; Kazak SSR Tarihy (History of Kazak SSR). Almaty, 1982, vol. 3, pp. 510-511.<br />

127 Aspendiyarov is sometimes written as Asfendiyarov.<br />

128 Aspendiyarov, Sanjar. Kazakstan tarihynyn ocherkteri (Notes of Kazakstan’s History). Almaty,<br />

(1935) 1994, pp. 57-60.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!