THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND THE QUESTION OF KAZAKHSTAN’S HISTORY
SOVYET-TARIH-YAZICILIGI-ENG
SOVYET-TARIH-YAZICILIGI-ENG
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>QUESTION</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>KAZAKHSTAN’S</strong> <strong>HISTORY</strong> 95<br />
ERMUKHAN BEKMAKHANOV <strong>AND</strong><br />
<strong>THE</strong> KENESARY KASYMULY REVOLT<br />
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Steven Sabol *<br />
For American and European students of Kazakh history, there are<br />
certain individuals that emerge in the scholarly literature that receive<br />
the majority of attention, whose works must be consulted, read, and<br />
studied, in order to examine the Kazakh national, cultural, political,<br />
economic, and social development. Often these are historic figures;<br />
individuals who shaped our understanding of the Kazakh nation, either<br />
through great or infamous deeds, perhaps with a legacy that alter our<br />
view of the Kazakh nation and its evolution. Among this illustrious<br />
list are khans and batyrs, such as Zhanibek and Kerai, Abulkhair, Ablai<br />
Khan, and others. Just as often, men of science and the arts capture<br />
our attention, most notably Chokan Valikhanov, Ibrahim Altynsarin,<br />
or Abai. For students of Kazakh history, these are serious individuals,<br />
but the historiography is as important as the scholars and writers<br />
who told their stories, men such as Alikhan Bokeikhanov, Mukhtar<br />
Auezov, Saken Seifullin, and others.<br />
Yet, we are also dependent upon the scholars and travelers to the<br />
Kazakh Zhuz, such as Aleksei Levshin, Radlov and Bartold, or Valikhanov<br />
who examined and interpreted Kazakh culture and society for<br />
scholars, and Shakarim Kudaiberuli who explained Kazakh genealogy,<br />
or the later historians such a S. Asfendiarov and S. Amanzholov, or<br />
Apollova, Kozybaev, and Viatkin. This is but a small number of the<br />
travelers and scholars that students embrace in their search for the<br />
Kazakh past. Few scholars, however, achieved both the notoriety<br />
and fame of Ermukhan Bekmakhanov. Even almost fifty years after<br />
his untimely and premature death, only a handful of scholars remain<br />
as critical to the study of Kazakh history and society. The reason is<br />
simple enough, he was a talented historian, but it was his subject that<br />
continues to feature so importantly for students of Kazakh history.<br />
His most important contribution remains Kazakhstan v 20-40 gody<br />
XIX veka, a thorough examination of the Kenesary Kasymov Revolt<br />
and Kazakh society on the eve of the final Russian conquest and<br />
colonization of the vast Kazakh steppe.<br />
For most American and European scholars, Solomon Schwarz first<br />
introduced Bekmakhanov’s story to the historical community with his<br />
1952 article, “Revising the History of Russian Colonization,” which<br />
appeared in Foreign Affairs. 146 This brief introduction to the “Bekmak-<br />
*<br />
University of North Carolina at Charlotte