19.12.2016 Views

THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND THE QUESTION OF KAZAKHSTAN’S HISTORY

SOVYET-TARIH-YAZICILIGI-ENG

SOVYET-TARIH-YAZICILIGI-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>QUESTION</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>KAZAKHSTAN’S</strong> <strong>HISTORY</strong> 67<br />

<strong>THE</strong> FATE <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> SCIENTIFIC HERITAGE <strong>OF</strong><br />

ERMUKHAN BEKMAKHANOV UNDER TOTALITARIAN REGIME<br />

Prof. Dr. Galina M. Kakenova *<br />

Ermukhan Bekmakhanov is the first professional historian among<br />

the Kazakhs that emerged in the Soviet period. He was the author of<br />

scientific works that highlight the acuteness of the problem and the<br />

novelty of the research. Monographs, textbooks and manuals devoted<br />

to the history of Kazakhstan of XVIII - XIX centuries as well as<br />

researches on pedagogy were issued from his pen.<br />

Bekmakhanov’s case materialized on a charge of “bourgeois nationalism”<br />

can exemplify how a totalitarian regime gives to the purely<br />

scientific academic debates the tone of a political one. The origins<br />

of Bekmakhanov’s historical concept and the fate of his monograph<br />

are the obvious reflection of the historical studies conditions and the<br />

relationship of totalitarianism regarding the creative intellectuals in the<br />

second half of 1940s – 1950s. In the historiography of Kazakhstan this<br />

period was characterized by further ideological offensive against the<br />

regime of professional personnel of scientific and artistic intellectuals.<br />

As we know, Bekmakhanov’s 1947 monograph of “Kazakhstan in<br />

20-40s of XIX. Century” became the object of heated debate in which<br />

were involved not only historians, but also economists, lawyers,<br />

journalists, and literary critics.<br />

The reprisals against Bekmakhanov and his monograph had its<br />

own prehistory. Historiographical understanding of this situation is<br />

important for understanding of forced “evolution” of Bekmakhanov’s<br />

concept, as well as for the general state of development of Kazakhstani<br />

historical science in the second half of the 1940s–1950s. The letters<br />

of A.M. Pankratova, which were published in the journal “History<br />

questions” in 1988, could serve as the evidence of this. 87<br />

“History of the Kazakh SSR from ancient times to the present days”<br />

was published in June 1943. It is commonly known that in the Soviet<br />

Union it was the first experience of creation of the history of a single<br />

national republic, co-written by Kazakhstani historians and specialists<br />

from Moscow evacuated to Almaty during the war. A number of<br />

chapters were devoted to the development of culture of Kazakhstan<br />

during the Soviet period. Along with the historians, the prominent<br />

Kazakh writers, scientists, linguists, and literary scholars, such as<br />

*<br />

L.N. Gumilev Eurasian National University<br />

87 Письмa Анны Михaйловны Пaнкрaтовой, Вопросы истории, 1988, No 11.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!