THE SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY AND THE QUESTION OF KAZAKHSTAN’S HISTORY
SOVYET-TARIH-YAZICILIGI-ENG
SOVYET-TARIH-YAZICILIGI-ENG
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>QUESTION</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>KAZAKHSTAN’S</strong> <strong>HISTORY</strong> 67<br />
<strong>THE</strong> FATE <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> SCIENTIFIC HERITAGE <strong>OF</strong><br />
ERMUKHAN BEKMAKHANOV UNDER TOTALITARIAN REGIME<br />
Prof. Dr. Galina M. Kakenova *<br />
Ermukhan Bekmakhanov is the first professional historian among<br />
the Kazakhs that emerged in the Soviet period. He was the author of<br />
scientific works that highlight the acuteness of the problem and the<br />
novelty of the research. Monographs, textbooks and manuals devoted<br />
to the history of Kazakhstan of XVIII - XIX centuries as well as<br />
researches on pedagogy were issued from his pen.<br />
Bekmakhanov’s case materialized on a charge of “bourgeois nationalism”<br />
can exemplify how a totalitarian regime gives to the purely<br />
scientific academic debates the tone of a political one. The origins<br />
of Bekmakhanov’s historical concept and the fate of his monograph<br />
are the obvious reflection of the historical studies conditions and the<br />
relationship of totalitarianism regarding the creative intellectuals in the<br />
second half of 1940s – 1950s. In the historiography of Kazakhstan this<br />
period was characterized by further ideological offensive against the<br />
regime of professional personnel of scientific and artistic intellectuals.<br />
As we know, Bekmakhanov’s 1947 monograph of “Kazakhstan in<br />
20-40s of XIX. Century” became the object of heated debate in which<br />
were involved not only historians, but also economists, lawyers,<br />
journalists, and literary critics.<br />
The reprisals against Bekmakhanov and his monograph had its<br />
own prehistory. Historiographical understanding of this situation is<br />
important for understanding of forced “evolution” of Bekmakhanov’s<br />
concept, as well as for the general state of development of Kazakhstani<br />
historical science in the second half of the 1940s–1950s. The letters<br />
of A.M. Pankratova, which were published in the journal “History<br />
questions” in 1988, could serve as the evidence of this. 87<br />
“History of the Kazakh SSR from ancient times to the present days”<br />
was published in June 1943. It is commonly known that in the Soviet<br />
Union it was the first experience of creation of the history of a single<br />
national republic, co-written by Kazakhstani historians and specialists<br />
from Moscow evacuated to Almaty during the war. A number of<br />
chapters were devoted to the development of culture of Kazakhstan<br />
during the Soviet period. Along with the historians, the prominent<br />
Kazakh writers, scientists, linguists, and literary scholars, such as<br />
*<br />
L.N. Gumilev Eurasian National University<br />
87 Письмa Анны Михaйловны Пaнкрaтовой, Вопросы истории, 1988, No 11.