01.06.2017 Views

UWE Bristol Engineering showcase 2015

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Max Wright<br />

BEng – Mechanical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Project Supervisor<br />

Dr Jason Matthews<br />

Conceptual Design of a UAV for Non-Civilian Operations<br />

Introduction<br />

Currently in use by the British Army to combat the global war on terror is the<br />

Desert Hawk 3 (DHIII), an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle developed in 2006 by<br />

Lockheed Martin. The DHIII is designed to be a portable, hand launched and<br />

skid recovered, versatile surveillance device with changeable payloads. This<br />

device was an update to the original Desert Hawk carried out by the Skunk<br />

Works team at Lockheed. The original was heavier and could stay in the air<br />

for thirty minutes less than the DHIII.<br />

The DHIII’s use in Afghanistan has primarily been reconnaissance, providing<br />

eye in the sky surveillance and situational awareness. Used by artillery units,<br />

often in Forward Operating Bases, their purpose is base security, the support<br />

of infantry patrols and target acquisition for artillery and air strikes. They can<br />

be a vital weapon in a units arsenal and can change the tide of a battle;<br />

knowing an enemies whereabouts and movements is key to success in<br />

combat.<br />

Problems With The Desert Hawk 3<br />

Upon communication with a British Army Royal Artillery Unit some problems<br />

were indentified:<br />

•It can't be used in rain<br />

•It can't be used in fog<br />

•It becomes unstable in winds over 15 knots<br />

•It struggles in temperatures below -5 and above +50<br />

•The endurance can be reduced when the batteries are affected by heat<br />

damage<br />

Modeling<br />

A desert Hawk 3 model was constructed on SolidWorks:<br />

Airfoil Selection<br />

The program Xfoil was used to determine an appropriate airfoil . This<br />

program produced 2D coefficients of lift and drag at various angles of attack<br />

(AOA) for 3 selected airfoils, NACA 2412, NACA 6412 & NACA 8414.<br />

Cl/Cd<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Cl/Cd vs AOA<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />

AOA<br />

NACA 2412<br />

NACA 6412<br />

NACA 8414<br />

After NACA 8414 was chosen, wing parameters were decided upon and 3D<br />

lift values were determined . Once appropriate parameters were selected<br />

SolidWorks models were constructed for the improved design. The<br />

subsequent design the Marsh Harrier I.2 is shown below.<br />

Flow simulations were conducted applying side winds to the two UAVs to<br />

determine displacement and head wind to determine lift and drag values,<br />

the data gathered was analyzed. The pictures below detail a contour plot and<br />

flow trajectories for the DHIII simulation.<br />

Project summary<br />

To determine a solution to the problems,<br />

weight was added through the changing of<br />

materials and the adding of heavier and<br />

more powerful engine. Airfoil selection was<br />

conducted using Xfoil and wing geometry was<br />

decided upon.<br />

Project Objectives<br />

The objective of the project was indentify one<br />

or more problems with the Desert Hawk 3<br />

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and work to find a<br />

solution. The negatives with the UAV were<br />

determined to be its susceptibility to wind<br />

and wet conditions.<br />

Project Conclusion<br />

In conclusion the project was a success in that<br />

it provided a solution to the designated<br />

problem. <strong>Engineering</strong> methods were<br />

employed using theoretical and experimental<br />

calculations to detail the difference in<br />

displacements when adding weight to the<br />

UAV. Although there were other options<br />

adding weight to the UAV proved most<br />

feasible given the limited information<br />

accessible.<br />

There are many further improvements that<br />

would be applied to the design if it were<br />

being taken further, firstly symmetrical airfoils<br />

for the tail would be selected to provide<br />

stability. Further work would be conducted to<br />

improve the design of the wing likely tapering<br />

them towards the ends to reduce induced<br />

drag produced at the tips. Manufacturing<br />

processes would be studied to indentify the<br />

most appropriate technique to apply in order<br />

to provide the best product.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!