UWE Bristol Engineering showcase 2015
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Max Wright<br />
BEng – Mechanical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Project Supervisor<br />
Dr Jason Matthews<br />
Conceptual Design of a UAV for Non-Civilian Operations<br />
Introduction<br />
Currently in use by the British Army to combat the global war on terror is the<br />
Desert Hawk 3 (DHIII), an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle developed in 2006 by<br />
Lockheed Martin. The DHIII is designed to be a portable, hand launched and<br />
skid recovered, versatile surveillance device with changeable payloads. This<br />
device was an update to the original Desert Hawk carried out by the Skunk<br />
Works team at Lockheed. The original was heavier and could stay in the air<br />
for thirty minutes less than the DHIII.<br />
The DHIII’s use in Afghanistan has primarily been reconnaissance, providing<br />
eye in the sky surveillance and situational awareness. Used by artillery units,<br />
often in Forward Operating Bases, their purpose is base security, the support<br />
of infantry patrols and target acquisition for artillery and air strikes. They can<br />
be a vital weapon in a units arsenal and can change the tide of a battle;<br />
knowing an enemies whereabouts and movements is key to success in<br />
combat.<br />
Problems With The Desert Hawk 3<br />
Upon communication with a British Army Royal Artillery Unit some problems<br />
were indentified:<br />
•It can't be used in rain<br />
•It can't be used in fog<br />
•It becomes unstable in winds over 15 knots<br />
•It struggles in temperatures below -5 and above +50<br />
•The endurance can be reduced when the batteries are affected by heat<br />
damage<br />
Modeling<br />
A desert Hawk 3 model was constructed on SolidWorks:<br />
Airfoil Selection<br />
The program Xfoil was used to determine an appropriate airfoil . This<br />
program produced 2D coefficients of lift and drag at various angles of attack<br />
(AOA) for 3 selected airfoils, NACA 2412, NACA 6412 & NACA 8414.<br />
Cl/Cd<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Cl/Cd vs AOA<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />
AOA<br />
NACA 2412<br />
NACA 6412<br />
NACA 8414<br />
After NACA 8414 was chosen, wing parameters were decided upon and 3D<br />
lift values were determined . Once appropriate parameters were selected<br />
SolidWorks models were constructed for the improved design. The<br />
subsequent design the Marsh Harrier I.2 is shown below.<br />
Flow simulations were conducted applying side winds to the two UAVs to<br />
determine displacement and head wind to determine lift and drag values,<br />
the data gathered was analyzed. The pictures below detail a contour plot and<br />
flow trajectories for the DHIII simulation.<br />
Project summary<br />
To determine a solution to the problems,<br />
weight was added through the changing of<br />
materials and the adding of heavier and<br />
more powerful engine. Airfoil selection was<br />
conducted using Xfoil and wing geometry was<br />
decided upon.<br />
Project Objectives<br />
The objective of the project was indentify one<br />
or more problems with the Desert Hawk 3<br />
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and work to find a<br />
solution. The negatives with the UAV were<br />
determined to be its susceptibility to wind<br />
and wet conditions.<br />
Project Conclusion<br />
In conclusion the project was a success in that<br />
it provided a solution to the designated<br />
problem. <strong>Engineering</strong> methods were<br />
employed using theoretical and experimental<br />
calculations to detail the difference in<br />
displacements when adding weight to the<br />
UAV. Although there were other options<br />
adding weight to the UAV proved most<br />
feasible given the limited information<br />
accessible.<br />
There are many further improvements that<br />
would be applied to the design if it were<br />
being taken further, firstly symmetrical airfoils<br />
for the tail would be selected to provide<br />
stability. Further work would be conducted to<br />
improve the design of the wing likely tapering<br />
them towards the ends to reduce induced<br />
drag produced at the tips. Manufacturing<br />
processes would be studied to indentify the<br />
most appropriate technique to apply in order<br />
to provide the best product.