01.06.2017 Views

UWE Bristol Engineering showcase 2015

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Abbie Grange<br />

MEng Motorsport <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Project Supervisor<br />

Dr Rohitha Weerasinghe<br />

Parametric Analysis and Optimisation of the Formula Student Body Shell<br />

Formation of the Parametric Model<br />

A parametric model maintains consistent<br />

relationships between certain elements, allowing<br />

the model to adapt to changes made to a specific<br />

variable. Parametric modelling is vital to the<br />

research undertaken in this study as it allows the<br />

Author to make structured, predefined changes<br />

that will automatically update the rest of the nose<br />

cone geometry and therefore ensure cohesive,<br />

reliable results.<br />

The body shell as a whole is defined and<br />

constrained around the chassis, with given<br />

clearances at key points that ensure the full<br />

clearance of all components. The nose cone region<br />

specifically is largely constrained to the impact<br />

attenuator as this is the last component that the<br />

body shell must clear before coming to a point.<br />

Utilising the geometry of the impact attenuator<br />

ensures proper fitment and clearance of the body<br />

shell, no matter what changes are made to the<br />

parametric model.<br />

Nose Cone Height Study<br />

This section of the investigation tests the isolated<br />

nose cone region as a lone bluff body which ends<br />

at the front roll hoop, therefore the cockpit region<br />

and the side pods are not included. As has been<br />

noted, the height study is split into categorised<br />

geometry and linear geometry analysis.<br />

Lift (N)<br />

It can be seen that there is a distinct reduction in<br />

the lift generated by the nose cone area when the<br />

nose cone height is increased; however the drag<br />

value remains largely unchanged. What is<br />

significant in the lift comparison chart is the<br />

increased stability of the lift values upon changing<br />

from categorised to linear geometry selection.<br />

Nose Cone Radii Study<br />

The underbody radii study aims to investigate the<br />

impact of changes to the underbody curvature<br />

with a constant optimum nose cone height of<br />

225mm above ground.<br />

Lift (N)<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

-2<br />

-3<br />

-4<br />

-5<br />

-6<br />

-7<br />

-8<br />

-9<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

-6<br />

-8<br />

-10<br />

-12<br />

-14<br />

Lift Comparison<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400<br />

Nose Cone Height Above Ground (mm)<br />

Underbody Radii Study Lift<br />

0<br />

90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160<br />

Bottom Dimension<br />

y = 0.0159x - 12.555<br />

Categorised<br />

Linear<br />

Further examination of the actual resulting lift<br />

values combined with the addition of a linear<br />

trend line appears to show that, whilst the values<br />

appear almost oscillatory, the magnitudes by<br />

which they change are very small, with a<br />

maximum of 3N between each model.<br />

Lift<br />

Linear (Lift)<br />

Assembly Analysis<br />

Inclusion of the chassis and suspension geometry<br />

is essential if the flow around the body shell is to<br />

be fully understood. Modelling the assembly flow<br />

allows for the interpretation of not only the<br />

aerodynamics of the body shell as a standalone<br />

piece, but also its inherent effects on the flow<br />

around various other important components.<br />

Unfortunately the flow over the upper surface of<br />

the nose cone does not provide sufficient energy<br />

to deflect the flow up and over this feature and<br />

the inclusion of a deflective screen would impair<br />

the drivers’ visibility.<br />

Transient Analysis<br />

Transient analysis involves the simulation of flow<br />

events over a predefined time period as opposed<br />

singular moments in time.<br />

The three second view also shows a secondary<br />

separation bubble beginning to form near the<br />

lower surface of the cockpit. This secondary<br />

bubble grows in magnitude as the speed increases<br />

resulting in two fully formed areas of flow<br />

separation.<br />

Project Summary<br />

This study involves the optimisation of the <strong>UWE</strong><br />

Formula Student body shell using a parametric<br />

modelling process. The investigation explores the<br />

effect of nose cone height and surrounding curvature<br />

on the lift and drag values experienced by the vehicle<br />

by conducting analysis using Computational Fluid<br />

Dynamics (CFD) software alongside wind tunnel<br />

testing. Upon discovery of an optimum design, full<br />

transient analysis is undertaken with variable inlet<br />

speeds as well as steady state analysis of the effects<br />

of inclusion of the vehicle assembly.<br />

Project Objectives<br />

• To design and analyse a body shell for the <strong>UWE</strong><br />

Formula Student 2014 vehicle using parametric<br />

modelling and analysis.<br />

• To optimise the nose cone height and understand<br />

the effect of change of surrounding surface radii<br />

on lift and drag.<br />

• To undertake transient analysis of the optimum<br />

design.<br />

• To validate computer based testing with wind<br />

tunnel analysis that includes ground effect.<br />

Project Conclusion<br />

As the two separate geometric studies show, lift<br />

characteristics appear to be heavily governed by the<br />

height at which the nose cone sits from the ground as<br />

opposed to the surrounding surface curvature.<br />

Analysis would suggest that changing of the<br />

underbody surface, whilst having some measurable<br />

effect lacks a significant trend line and is therefore<br />

negligible at the speeds tested. It would be<br />

recommended that the Team carefully consider the<br />

nose cone height with a view of optimising it in terms<br />

of negative lift force so as to counteract the inherent<br />

lift generated when the vehicle assembly is added.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!