UWE Bristol Engineering showcase 2015
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Sven Cumner<br />
MEng – Motorsport <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Project Supervisor<br />
Dr Changho Yang<br />
Optimisation of Turbocharger Wastegate Design<br />
Modern Turbocharging Applications<br />
In the modern automotive world, turbocharging is becoming more and<br />
more common place. Advancements in the technology have allowed<br />
automotive manufacturers to develop small capacity engines with the<br />
power of large engines, that still maintain the frugal economy and low<br />
emissions of a smaller engine. Modern motorsport series, such as Formula<br />
One, are now also adapting to the need for smaller, turbocharged engines,<br />
creating more fuel efficient vehicles and boosting development of<br />
turbocharger technologies. Understanding how this technology works and<br />
how it can be applied more effectively to an internal combustion engine is<br />
vital in today’s motorsport industry.<br />
Why does the common wastegate valve need to be redeveloped?<br />
The standard wastegate system consists of a flat faced, sharp edged valve<br />
seat and valve. This typical valve and valve seat geometry is not<br />
aerodynamically efficient and is likely to flow badly at small-angle valve<br />
openings. Rather than focussing on outright flow capability, the aim of this<br />
study was to improve the quality of the flow through the valve, and in to<br />
the rest of the exhaust system. Increasing the quality of the flow focusses<br />
on increasing the predictability and efficiency of the flow, to allow more<br />
precise control of the wastegate in advanced, modern powertrains.<br />
Wastegate control may become a more useable, important control system<br />
in future engines, if the wastegate flow characteristics can be predicted<br />
more accurately<br />
Concept Valve Designs<br />
After the factory wastegate valve was modelled, several alternative<br />
concepts were developed, from rudimentary sketches in to Solidworks<br />
models integrated in to the entire turbocharger assembly. A valuable<br />
feature of modelling the valve assembly like the real system is that the<br />
geometry of the valve concepts could be tested to see if they would<br />
physically work within the factory turbine housing. The aim was to make<br />
sure the original turbine housing could be used without modification, hence<br />
the concept valves needing to work with the original housing geometry.<br />
Above top left: Factory wastegate valve, open 10 degrees.<br />
Above top right: Hemisphere valve with circled areas indicating<br />
improved symmetrical flow area across the valve.<br />
Above bottom left: Concave Cone valve<br />
Above bottom middle/right: Wedge valve<br />
Below top/middle: ANSYS CFD flow simulations for turbine/wastegate.<br />
Below bottom: Temperature and pressure plots on flow domain<br />
Project summary<br />
This project developed the theory and understanding<br />
of wastegate valve design, along with showcasing<br />
some of the problems faced by engineers attempting<br />
to optimise this system.<br />
Project Objectives<br />
To create an optimised pairing of concept valve and<br />
valve seat designs, giving rise to a more predictable,<br />
controllable wastegate flow stream. This was done<br />
through the use of Solidworks CAD modelling and<br />
ANSYS CFD analysis.<br />
Project Conclusion<br />
• No ‘perfect’ valve/valve seat duo was created,<br />
however improvements were seen with some of<br />
the concept designs.<br />
• A ‘Concave Cone’ valve brought about the most<br />
stable, laminar flow from the turbine of the<br />
turbocharger.<br />
• An ‘Up/Down Wedge’ valve brought about the<br />
best wastegate flow, directing exhaust gases in two<br />
broad streams along the upper and lower faces of<br />
the exhaust down-pipe.